Efficacy/Safety of Urogynecology Synthetic Mesh Surgery

April 2, 2023 updated by: Chin-Tsung Shen, Mackay Medical College

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Urogynecology Synthetic Mesh Surgery in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse

This is a retrospective cohort study, aiming at analyzing the efficacy and safety of mesh surgery in pelvic organ prolapse. The synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse include transvaginal mesh or laparotomy, laparoscope, or robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with mesh augmentation. The investigators would like to evaluate the efficacy and safety, such as recurrence rates and complication rates for women who underwent urogynecology mesh surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Gynecologic mesh, including transvaginal mesh and mesh used in abdominal or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, has been used for pelvic organ prolapse since its debut in the US in 2005. It provides higher success and satisfaction rate than traditional colporrhaphy, but mesh-related complications, such as pain, mesh exposure and bleeding, have been reported. U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a Safety Update in 2011 to inform the public that serious complications associated with synthetic mesh for the transvaginal repair of POP were common. Taiwan FDA and associated committees decided that the use of gynecologic mesh should be regulated. Thorough study and evaluation are needed.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • New Taipei City, Taiwan
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

History of POP patients with concurrent objective and/or subjective voiding dysfunctions who underwent primary TVM surgery for symptomatic POP

≥ stage II (POP Quantification system; POP-Q system) in Mackay Memorial Hospital were recruited.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pelvic organ prolapse patients with objective / subjective voiding dysfunctions
  • Underwent surgery for symptomatic POP ≥ stage II (POP-Q system)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of pelvic radiation.
  • Patients with a history of vesico-/recto-/urethra-vaginal fistula
  • Patients unable to be followed up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
mesh surgery
Data obtained before the operation
Urodynamic investigations (The urodynamic study included free uroflowmetry, postvoid residual, filling and voiding cystometry, and a urethral pressure profile. The filling cystometry and urethral pressure profile were performed with 37 degrees C normal saline similar to body temperature at an infusion rate of 80 ml/min.
Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy
Data obtained before the operation
All surgeries were performed using a DaVinci robotic system (Intuitive® Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, California,US) with standardized technique and materials. Patients were positioned in dorsal lithotomy and steep Trendelenburg position. Trocars were placed bilaterally, and an assistant port was placed laterally. The peritoneum was opened medial to the ureter to develop an avascular space. The mesh was placed on the posterior and anterior vaginal wall and fixed at the level of anterior longitudinal ligaments S1/S2 by sutures. An intraoperative clinical examination was performed to ensure the mesh was in a tension-free position.
a hysterectomy with trans-vaginal mesh repair (Surelift®, Neomedic International, Barcelona, Spain)
Data obtained before the operation
In summary, a vertical incision was made in the anterior vaginal wall to access the vesicovaginal space. The sacrospinous ligament was dissected, and an applicator was inserted and positioned over the SSL. The anchor was fixed to the SSL and the thread was attached to the mesh. The mesh was then adjusted in a tension-free manner, excess mesh was cut, and the incision was closed with suture.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
trans-vaginal mesh repair
Time Frame: Generally in our hospital, pre-operative investigation will be done about 30 days before surgery, post-operative investigation will within 1year after surgery.

Urodynamic investigations (The urodynamic study included free uroflowmetry, postvoid residual, filling and voiding cystometry, and a urethral pressure profile. The filling cystometry and urethral pressure profile were performed with 37 degrees C normal saline similar to body temperature at an infusion rate of 80 ml/min.

  1. The urodynamic data of POP patient with grade > or = II, will be retrograde analyzed and and compared.
  2. Pressure-associated parameters, such as abdominal pressure (Pabd), detrusor pressure (Pdet) will be measured as centimeter of water column (cmH2O), volume-associated parameters, such as infused volume (Vinf), voided volume (Vvod) and intravesical volume (Vive) will measured as ml. Derived parameter will be expressed as their results of calculation.
Generally in our hospital, pre-operative investigation will be done about 30 days before surgery, post-operative investigation will within 1year after surgery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hui-Hsuan Lau, M.D., Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 22MMHIS361e

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

For we uncertain if this might violate personal information laws in our country.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Clinical Trials on Urodynamic investigations before and after a mesh surgery protocol.

3
Subscribe