The WORKER Study: Escitalopram and Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) for Depressed Working People

May 7, 2012 updated by: University of British Columbia

The WORKER Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Escitalopram and Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy in Working Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

This study will investigate the additional benefits of telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy (Tel-CBT) as added treatment to an antidepressant (escitalopram) in working people with major depressive disorder (MDD) versus treatment with escitalopram alone. Outcomes will include depression symptom rating scales and measures of work absence and productivity. The hypothesis is that Tel-CBT and escitalopram will result in better outcomes than escitalopram alone in working patients with MDD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale CBT is recognized as an effective psychological treatment for MDD. However, there are still considerable barriers to access CBT. Newer methods of delivering CBT, such as over the telephone (Tel-CBT), allow for greater access and convenience, at potentially lower cost. This is especially relevant for working people because the service can be delivered during evenings and weekends, so they do not need to leave work to attend clinic appointments. Ease of access is also important for rural settings where distance to health facilities can be a barrier to care. The ease of delivery of Tel-CBT, both in setup and maintenance costs, may also make it an important component of enhanced support for primary care. Preliminary studies have shown that addition of Tel-CBT leads to better outcomes than usual care alone (Simon et al, 2004; Wang et al, 2007).

This study will investigate the added value of Tel-CBT as adjunctive treatment to an antidepressant (escitalopram) in working people with MDD versus treatment with escitalopram alone, focusing on work-related outcomes. Escitalopram offers advantages as a first-choice treatment for depressed working people, given its superior efficacy compared to other antidepressants, excellent tolerability and simplicity of use for family physicians. Observational studies have shown significant reductions in sick leave when depressed patients are treated with escitalopram (Winkler et al, 2007). Outcome will be rigorously evaluated by assessing absenteeism and work productivity, response and remission rates, and quality of life, after acute (3 month) treatment and longer-term (6 month) follow-up.

Research Method This is a 6-month, multi-centre, single-blind (rater), randomized, parallel-design study to assess the efficacy of escitalopram and Tel-CBT in the treatment of working subjects with MDD, compared to treatment with escitalopram alone. A total of 150 depressed patients meeting entry criteria will be enrolled over a 1 year period.

Eligible patients will be treated with escitalopram 10-20 mg/d for the entire treatment period (6 months). Patients will be randomized to addition of telephone-based CBT with 8 sessions conducted over a 3 month period, or to a (placebo) control condition of reminder telephone calls. Outcomes (HAM-D, MADRS) will be primarily assessed over the telephone by raters blind to treatment assignment. Other outcome measures will be assessed by patient-rated questionnaires administered over the internet using a secure web site, and by ratings from the treating physician (CGI and adverse events).

Statistical Analysis All randomized subjects who have at least one follow-up visit will be included in the analysis based on intent-to-treat. Ineligible subjects who are inappropriately randomized will be excluded from the analysis. Missing data will be imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). For the analyses the treatment variables will remain coded and the analysts and investigators will remain blinded to variable identity during analysis and interpretation.

The pre-specified primary efficacy endpoint is the adjusted mean change from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks) in the HAM-D score using LOCF. All comparisons will be analyzed using ANCOVA adjusting for baseline value and centre. The secondary outcomes will also be analyzed using a similar analysis, when appropriate. Post hoc analyses will also examine observed case data. Categorical data (such as proportions of the sample with adverse events) will be analyzed using chi-square tests or Fisher's test where cell sizes warrant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

105

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6T 2A1
        • UBC Hospital Mood Disorders Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female outpatients aged 18-65 years.
  • Patients will meet DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder as determined by the mood disorders section of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI, Sheehan et al, 1998).
  • Currently employed (or off work for 2 weeks or less, and expecting to return to work at the start of study).
  • A score of 18 or greater on the self-rated version of the MADRS, indicating at least moderately severe depression.
  • Competency to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients on short-term (except for circumstances under Inclusion Criteria) or long-term disability.
  • Pregnant women, lactating women and sexually active women of childbearing potential who are not using medically accepted means of contraception.
  • Serious suicidal risks as judged by the study doctor.
  • The following DSM-IV diagnoses (to ensure a homogenous diagnostic group): Organic mental disorders; Substance abuse/dependence, including alcohol, active within the last year; Schizophrenia, Paranoid or Delusional Disorders; Other Psychotic disorders; Panic disorder; Generalized Anxiety Disorder; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, if a primary diagnosis; Bipolar Disorder;Bulimia Nervosa; Anorexia Nervosa.
  • Serious illness including cardiac, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrinologic, neurologic and hematologic disease that is not stabilized.
  • Regular or current use of other psychotropic drugs.
  • Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors within 14 days of Visit 1, fluoxetine within 5 weeks of Visit 1, and other antidepressants within 7 days of Visit 1 (to ensure adequate drug washouts prior to starting escitalopram).
  • Previous use of escitalopram.
  • Treatment resistance in the current episode, as defined by failure (lack of clinically significant response) of two or more antidepressants given at therapeutic doses for at least 6 weeks.
  • Patients who start formal psychotherapy (e.g. cognitive-behavioural or interpersonal psychotherapy) within 3 months of Visit 1, or who plan to initiate such psychotherapy during this study.
  • Patients involved in any other form of treatment for depression.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Telephone-based CBT: Eight sessions of telephone-based CBT (Tel-CBT) will be delivered over 8-10 weeks, based on a published manual (Simon et al, 2004). Tel-CBT has been modified to be briefer than traditional CBT (30-40 minutes instead of 60 minutes per session) and will be offered at convenient times (including evening sessions). The initial Tel-CBT session will occur within 2 weeks of randomization, with subsequent sessions occurring every 1-2 weeks depending on scheduling and patient preference. The initial session focuses on motivation enhancement exercises, subsequent sessions emphasize identifying, challenging and distancing from negative thoughts, and the final session focuses on a personal care plan and self-management skills.
Placebo Comparator: 2
Telephone reminder calls
Telephone reminder calls: Weekly telephone calls for 8 weeks to inquire on progress and remind patients to take their medications properly

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in adjusted HAM-D and MADRS scores at 3 month followup
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
At 3 and 6 month followup: clinical response and remission rates, absenteeism and work productivity, adverse events, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness.
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Raymond W. Lam, MD, FRCPC, University of British Columbia
  • Study Director: Sagar V. Parikh, University of British Columbia
  • Study Director: Erin E. Michalak, University of British Columbia
  • Study Director: Kevin Solomons, University of British Columbia
  • Study Director: Sidney H. Kennedy, Ph.D, University of British Columbia
  • Study Director: Edwin M. Tam, University of British Columbia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

June 20, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 9, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2012

Last Verified

May 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe