Effects of Technique on the Local Anesthetic Dose Required for Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block

August 5, 2008 updated by: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Effects of Ultrasound Guidance on the Minimum Effective Anesthetic Volume Required for Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block Versus Nerve Stimulator Guidance

Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) is a common nerve block given to patients who are undergoing shoulder surgery. This block has a low, but still significant, rate of complications. Reducing the volume of local anesthetic given during the block may allow some of these complications to be avoided. Participants will be randomly assigned to a group to undergo ISBPB under ultrasound or nerve stimulator guidance. Each group will initially receive 10mL of local anesthetic. The volume used for each subsequent patient depends upon the success or failure of the previous patient's block - a failure will cause the volume given to increase by 2.5mL, while a success will cause the volume to decrease by the same amount. We hypothesize that the minimum effective anesthetic volume in 50% of patients will be significantly lower in the ultrasound guided group than in the nerve stimulator group. We further hypothesize that this lower volume will lead to a decreased rate of complications.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This will be a randomized, single-blind, up-down sequential allocation study. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups, and receive either an ultrasound-guided or nerve-stimulator guided interscalene brachial plexus block. The initial local anesthetic volume in both groups will be 10mL. The outcome of each patient's block will determine the dose for the subsequent patient. When an effective ISBPB is observed, as defined by a NRS (patient-rated pain on a scale from 0 to 10) rating of 0 within 30 minutes post-surgery, the volume of local anesthetic solution used for the next patient will be decreased by 2.5mL. Conversely, when an ineffective ISBPB is observed, the volume of local anesthetic used for the next patient will be increased by 2.5mL.

The goal of this study is to determine the minimum effective anesthetic volume of ropivacaine 0.5% providing analgesia in patients when using either ultrasound or a nerve stimulator to guide placement of the block. The primary outcome measure will be the pain score of the patient on a numeric rating score during the 30 minutes after surgery.

A number of previous studies have suggested that ultrasound-guidance is beneficial for peripheral nerve blocks in terms of block performance time, success rates, and block quality. Some studies have also shown that ultrasound-guidance can reduce the volume of local anesthetic needed to perform a successful block. This study may reveal that less local anesthetic is needed under ultrasound guidance than under nerve stimulator, which may potentially reduce some of the common complications of ISBPB.

We hypothesize that ISBPB done under ultrasound guidance will have a lower minimum effective local anesthetic volume than ISBPB done under nerve stimulation. Further, we hypothesize that the lower volume will reduce the incidence of some of the complications of ISBPB.

Using lower volumes of local anesthetic while still maintaining effective analgesia may reduce some of the common complications of ISBPB. It may also allow this beneficial analgesic technique to be given to patients with some respiratory risk factors who are currently unable to receive it.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Recruiting
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Colin J McCartney, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andrew McNaught, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Uma D Shastri, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving interscalene brachial plexus block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA >III, and body mass index (BMI) >35, pre-existing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unstable asthma, psychiatric history, renal or hepatic impairment, allergy to ropivacaine, and opioid tolerance (>30 mg oral morphine or equivalent per day).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1 - Ultrasound
Participants will receive an ultrasound guided interscalene brachial plexus block
Each sequential participant in this group will be assigned a dose based on the success or failure of the previous participant's block. The starting dose will be 10mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Each success will decrease the dose by 2.5mL and each failure will subsequently increase the dose by 2.5mL.
Active Comparator: 2 - Nerve Stimulator
Participants will receive a nerve stimulator guided interscalene brachial plexus block
Each sequential participant in this group will be assigned a dose based on the success or failure of the previous participant's block. The starting dose will be 10mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Each success will decrease the dose by 2.5mL and each failure will subsequently increase the dose by 2.5mL.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain Rating as based on 11 point NRS scale
Time Frame: within 30 minutes or less post-surgery
within 30 minutes or less post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Diaphragmatic Function (as assessed by diaphragmatic movement on ultrasound)
Time Frame: within 30 minutes post-block
within 30 minutes post-block

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Colin J McCartney, MD, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2009

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

August 8, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 8, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2008

Last Verified

August 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe