A Long-term Efficacy and Safety Study of Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013) in Japanese Participants With Chronic Pain

June 23, 2014 updated by: Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.

A Study of a Long-term Administration of JNS013 in Patients With Chronic Pain

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tramadol hydrochloride plus acetaminophen (JNS013) with long term administration in participants with chronic pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is an open-label (both physician and participant know the name of the study drug), non-randomized, multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study) and long-term efficacy and safety study of JNS013 (combination of tramadol hydrochloride (TRAM) with acetaminophen [APAP]) in participants with chronic pain (aching sensation that persists for more than a few months. It may or may not be associated with trauma or disease, and may persist after the initial injury has healed. Its localization, character, and timing are more vague than with acute pain). This study consists of 4 periods; screening period: 1 week, treatment period I: 4 weeks, treatment period II: 48 weeks and follow-up period: 1 week. During Treatment Period I, restrictions on concomitant treatments will be established and the participants will be treated with one or two tablets of JNS013, four times daily for four weeks. During Treatment Period II, the participants will be treated for 48 weeks using the same dosing method and dose level for JNS013 as was used during Treatment Period I, permitting modifications to the concomitant drugs/therapies as during normal medical care. Throughout both Treatment Period I and Treatment Period II, the decision will be made to permit the participants to select to use either one or two tablets of JNS013 per dose according to the extent of the participant's pain and tolerability. The total duration of treatment period will be of 52 weeks. Efficacy will be assessed using change from baseline in Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS24) score at the pre-defined time point until Week 52. Participants safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

219

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chikushi, Japan
      • Chuo, Japan
      • Fukui, Japan
      • Fukuoka, Japan
      • Hiratsuka, Japan
      • Ichikawa, Japan
      • Kashiwa, Japan
      • Komatsu, Japan
      • Kuki, Japan
      • Kumamoto, Japan
      • Kyoto, Japan
      • Mihara, Japan
      • Nagoya, Japan
      • Nerima, Japan
      • Obihiro, Japan
      • Ogi, Japan
      • Ohta-Ku, Japan
      • Osaka, Japan
      • Tagawa, Japan
      • Taito-Ku, Japan
      • Takaoka, Japan
      • Tokyo, Japan
      • Tokyo N/A, Japan
      • Urayasu, Japan
      • Yame, Japan
      • Yokohama, Japan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants whose pain cannot be controlled sufficiently with at least 14-day continuous treatment with identical oral non steroid anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at a usual maximum dose during 3 months prior to this study
  • Ambulatory participants without need for any supportive device or assistance during daily life
  • Outpatients
  • Participants who do not plan to change the therapeutic policy and content of the medications for underlying disease during screening period to the end of Treatment Period I
  • Sustention of chronic pain due to Osteo Arthritis (OA), Low Back Pain (LBP), Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Neck Shoulder Arm Syndrome (NSAS), Diabetic Neuropathy (DN), Post herpetic Neuralgia (PHN) or other for at least 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with conditions for which opioids are contraindicated
  • Participants with conditions for which APAP are contraindicated
  • Participants with history of convulsion or the possibility of convulsive seizure
  • Participants with concurrent, previous, or possible alcohol dependence, drug dependence, or narcotic addiction
  • Pregnant Participants or those who may be pregnant, lactating mothers, and Participants who wish pregnancy during the study period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tramadol HCL plus Acetaminophen
Tramadol hydrochloride 37.5 milligram (mg) plus acetaminophen 325 mg (JNS013) one or two tablets will be given orally four times daily (maximum dose is 8 tablets per day) for 4 weeks during treatment period 1 (restrictions on concomitant treatments will be established) and for 48 weeks during treatment period 2 (permitting modifications to the concomitant drugs/therapies). The dosing interval will be of at least 4 hours.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS24) Score at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4
Pain over the last 24 hours was assessed by using VAS score ranges from 0 millimeter (mm)=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. An increase in score from baseline represented disease progression and decrease represented improvement.
Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline in VAS24 Score at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52
Pain over the last 24 hours was assessed by using VAS score ranges from 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. An increase in score from baseline represented disease progression and decrease represented improvement.
Baseline and Week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in VAS24 Score
Time Frame: Week 4 and 52
Pain over the last 24 hours was assessed by using VAS score ranges from 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. An increase in score from baseline represented disease progression and decrease represented improvement.
Week 4 and 52
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at Week 4
Time Frame: Week 4
PID is defined as the amount of change in the pain intensity at each evaluation time point (at 2 and 4 hours after the study drug dosing) from the baseline for each participant. Pain Intensity was evaluated on a 4-stage scale ranging from 3=severe pain to 0=no pain. PID ranges from -3 (the worst) to +3 (the most improved).
Week 4
Pain Relief (PAR) Score at Week 4
Time Frame: Week 4
Pain relief was evaluated based on a 5-stage scale from 4 (complete relief) to 0 (no relief). An increase in score represented improvement and decrease represented disease progression
Week 4
Pain Relief Combined With Pain Intensity Difference (PRID) at Week 4
Time Frame: Week 4
PRID was sum of the PID and PAR for each participant at each evaluation time point (2 hours after dosing, 4 hours after dosing). Pain Intensity was evaluated on a 4-stage scale ranges from 3=severe pain to 0=no pain and PID ranges from -3 (the worst) to +3 (the most improved). PAR ranges from 0 (no improved) to +4 (the most improved). PRID ranges from -3 (the worst) to +7 (the most improved).
Week 4
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4 and 52
SF-36 is a metric for general health and Quality of Life (QOL), consists of 8 sub-scale indices related to health and QOL (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health). Each of the sub-scale scores ranged from 0 to 100, where higher values indicate a better health status or a better mental status.
Baseline, Week 4 and 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

August 18, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 2, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2014

Last Verified

June 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Tramadol Hydrochloride (HCL) plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)

Subscribe