Use of Implanted Microstimulators for Decreasing Spasticity and Improving Motion Following Spinal Cord Injury

Case Study Testing the Use of Implanted Microstimulators for Decreasing Spasticity and Improving Motion Following Spinal Cord Injury

The primary aims of this study are to determine the safety of the RFM System (Alfred Mann Foundation, Santa Clarita, CA) in a patient with incomplete SCI and the effect of the RFM system on lower limb strength and spasticity. The secondary aim is to analyze any improvement in the participant's mobility.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Restoring mobility after spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most important goals of rehabilitation. Even for patients with partial lower limb motor function after SCI, many have limited mobility because of significant spasticity. Therapeutic electrical neuromuscular stimulation (TNS) has been used to improve muscle tone and strength and to enable walking and standing in patients with SCI. We propose to use the Radio Frequency Microstimulator (RFM) System, a new and novel implantable TNS system developed by the Alfred E. Mann Foundation, to improve muscle strength and reduce spasticity in a patient with incomplete SCI. The RFM System has several advantages over current TNS systems. The RFM implant devices are small enough (diameter 2.4 mm, length 16.7 mm) to be inserted using an incision approximately 5 mm long and have no lead wires passing through the skin since the microstimulator contains both the anode and cathode. Implanted RFM devices can be placed near multiple motor points and/or nerves and are controlled individually using radio frequency technology. Up to six (6) RFM devices will be inserted, two to three in each lower limb to provide stimulation to a patient's bilateral knee extensors (femoral nerve stimulation) and ankle dorsiflexors (peroneal nerve stimulation) to assess the effects on muscle strength, limb spasticity and patient mobility.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20307
        • Walter Reed Army Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 55 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • an incomplete C6 ASIA C (Central Cord) spinal cord injury
  • lower motor function impaired and suffers from significant spasticity (Ashworth scale 4)
  • able to ambulate approximately 10-20 feet with a rolling walker and minimal assistance
  • has sufficient endurance to complete at least two 20-minute therapy sessions per day
  • cognitive abilities are intact

Exclusion Criteria:

  • psychiatric diagnosis
  • medical contraindications
  • history of bleeding disorders
  • allergy to anesthesia
  • acute or progressive disease
  • active implantable device

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Treatment
Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation
Implantable peripheral muscle microstimulator, delivering controlled pulsatile stimulation to femoral nerves for knee extension and peroneal nerves for dorsiflexion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Throughout
Throughout
Lower Limb Strength
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 weeks, 12, 24 months
6, 12, 24 weeks, 12, 24 months
Lower Limb Spasticity
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 weeks, 12, 24 months
6, 12, 24 weeks, 12, 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mobility
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 weeks, 12, 24 months
6, 12, 24 weeks, 12, 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: KEVIN F FITZPATRICK, M.D., Walter Reed Army Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 29, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 23, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2012

Last Verified

January 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level With Incomplete Lesion

Clinical Trials on Radio Frequency Microstimulator

3
Subscribe