- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00784043
Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children With the MED-EL Cochlear Implant
April 26, 2018 updated by: Med-El Corporation
Longitudinal Efficacy in Young Children Implanted Bilaterally With MED-EL COMBI 40+ / PULSARCI100/SONATATI100 Cochlear Implant Systems.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and document longitudinal efficacy in young children implanted bilaterally with MED-EL COMBI 40+ / PULSARCI100/SONATATI100 cochlear implant systems.
Study Overview
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
37
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5
- London Health Sciences Centre
-
-
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32207
- Nemours Children's Clinic
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30324
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44124
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75230
- Dallas Otolaryngology Associates
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75235
- Callier Center
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Texas Children's Hospital
-
-
Virginia
-
Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507
- Eastern Virginia Medical School
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
- Medical College of Wisconsin
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
1 year to 3 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Between 12 and 36 months of age at time of implantation
- Profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss
- English as the primary language in the home
- Realistic expectations of guardians
- Child must be enrolled in a post-operative rehabilitative/educational program that supports the use of cochlear implants and the development of auditory-based skills
- Willing and available to comply with all scheduled procedures as defined in the protocol
Audiological:
- Profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss with average thresholds between ears of 90 dB HL or greater at 1000 Hz and above, and must demonstrate minimal functional benefit from conventional amplification
- Behavioral test measures must include unaided threshold measures for the right and left ears using insert earphones; left-alone and right-alone aided sound field threshold measurements; and aided and unaided speech-awareness / detection thresholds (for each ear individually)
- Children accepted into the study must be able to demonstrate a consistent response to sound. If a child has no measurable hearing, he/she must be able to demonstrate a consistent response to vibrotactile stimuli.
- All children must have completed an appropriate trial period with optimally fit amplification prior to inclusion in the study.
Medical:
- Good general health status, as judged by Primary Investigator
- Patent cochleae bilaterally, as indicated by radiological evaluation
- No contraindications for surgery, in general, or cochlear implant surgery in particular
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior experience with any cochlear implant system
- Younger than 12 months or older than 36 months at time of implantation
- Audiological: Presence of otoacoustic emissions and/or cochlear microphonic, indicating possible condition of auditory neuropathy
Medical:
- Evidence of ossification that would prevent full insertion of the standard C40+ / PULSARCI100 /SONATATI100 electrode array in the cochlea(e) to be implanted, as indicated by radiological evaluation
- Abnormal or malformed cochlea(e) to be implanted
- Severed or non-functional auditory nerve in the ear(s) to be implanted
- Central auditory lesion
- Cognitive and/or neurological dysfunction
- Auditory neuropathy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Bilateral
Bilaterally implanted simultaneously
|
Bilateral Implantation in children
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Unilateral
Unilaterally implanted
|
Bilateral Implantation in children
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Longitudinal Efficacy in Young Children Implanted Bilaterally With MED-EL COMBI 40+ / PULSARCI100/SONATATI100 Cochlear Implant Systems
Time Frame: 60 months post initial stimulation
|
Speech perception scores will be compared pre-operatively and postoperatively.
|
60 months post initial stimulation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Language Acquisition Over Time in Bilaterally Implanted Children.
Time Frame: 60 months post initial activation
|
Scores over time on the MacArthur communicative development inventory.
|
60 months post initial activation
|
|
Speech Production Over Time in Children Implanted Bilaterally With a MED-EL Cochlear Implant.
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Speech production scores over time on the Goldman-Fristoe test of articulation and the Kaufman speech praxis test for children.
|
5 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Schleich P, Nopp P, D'Haese P. Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant. Ear Hear. 2004 Jun;25(3):197-204. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000130792.43315.97.
- Kuhn-Inacker H, Shehata-Dieler W, Muller J, Helms J. Bilateral cochlear implants: a way to optimize auditory perception abilities in deaf children? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004 Oct;68(10):1257-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.04.029.
- Nopp P, Schleich P, D'Haese P. Sound localization in bilateral users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2004 Jun;25(3):205-14. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000130793.20444.50.
- Muller J, Schon F, Helms J. Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system. Ear Hear. 2002 Jun;23(3):198-206. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200206000-00004.
- Schon F, Muller J, Helms J. Speech reception thresholds obtained in a symmetrical four-loudspeaker arrangement from bilateral users of MED-EL cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol. 2002 Sep;23(5):710-4. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200209000-00018.
- Tyler RS, Gantz BJ, Rubinstein JT, Wilson BS, Parkinson AJ, Wolaver A, Preece JP, Witt S, Lowder MW. Three-month results with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2002 Feb;23(1 Suppl):80S-89S. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200202001-00010.
- Winkler F, Schon F, Peklo L, Muller J, Feinen Ch, Helms J. [The Wurzburg questionnaire for assessing the quality of hearing in CI-children (WH-CIK)]. Laryngorhinootologie. 2002 Mar;81(3):211-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-25042. German.
- Zimmerman-Phillips S, Robbins AM, Osberger MJ. Assessing cochlear implant benefit in very young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2000 Dec;185:42-3. doi: 10.1177/0003489400109s1217. No abstract available.
- Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Osberger MJ. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 1995 Oct;16(5):470-81. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199510000-00004.
- Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Ricketts TA, Labadie RF, Haynes DS. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2007 Aug;28(4):524-41. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc21a.
- Ricketts TA, Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Haynes DS, Labadie RF. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources. Ear Hear. 2006 Dec;27(6):763-73. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000240814.27151.b9.
- Dorman MF, Dahlstrom L. Speech understanding by cochlear-implant patients with different left- and right-ear electrode arrays. Ear Hear. 2004 Apr;25(2):191-4. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000120367.70123.9a.
- Laback B, Pok SM, Baumgartner WD, Deutsch WA, Schmid K. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors. Ear Hear. 2004 Oct;25(5):488-500. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000145124.85517.e8.
- Van Hoesel R, Ramsden R, Odriscoll M. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user. Ear Hear. 2002 Apr;23(2):137-49. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200204000-00006.
- Pijl S. Single-channel versus bilateral multichannel cochlear implant results: a case report. Ear Hear. 1991 Dec;12(6):431-3. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199112000-00007.
- Beijen JW, Snik AF, Mylanus EA. Sound localization ability of young children with bilateral cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol. 2007 Jun;28(4):479-85. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3180430179.
- Truy E, Ionescu E, Ceruse P, Gallego S. The binaural digisonic cochlear implant: surgical technique. Otol Neurotol. 2002 Sep;23(5):704-9. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200209000-00017.
- Brown KD, Balkany TJ. Benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation: a review. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct;15(5):315-8. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3282ef3d3e.
- Das S, Buchman CA. Bilateral cochlear implantation: current concepts. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Oct;13(5):290-3. doi: 10.1097/01.moo.0000179808.00638.ab.
- Offeciers E, Morera C, Muller J, Huarte A, Shallop J, Cavalle L. International consensus on bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005 Sep;125(9):918-9. doi: 10.1080/00016480510044412. No abstract available.
- Verschuur CA, Lutman ME, Ramsden R, Greenham P, O'Driscoll M. Auditory localization abilities in bilateral cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol. 2005 Sep;26(5):965-71. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000185073.81070.07.
- Senn P, Kompis M, Vischer M, Haeusler R. Minimum audible angle, just noticeable interaural differences and speech intelligibility with bilateral cochlear implants using clinical speech processors. Audiol Neurootol. 2005 Nov-Dec;10(6):342-52. doi: 10.1159/000087351. Epub 2005 Aug 5.
- Sharma A, Dorman MF, Kral A. The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res. 2005 May;203(1-2):134-43. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.12.010.
- Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Stecker M, Muller-Deile J, Maune S, Dillier N, Weber B, Hey M, Begall K, Lenarz T, Battmer RD, Bohm M, Steffens T, Strutz J, Linder T, Probst R, Allum J, Westhofen M, Doering W. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Otol Neurotol. 2004 Nov;25(6):958-68. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200411000-00016.
- Litovsky RY, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, Peters R, Lake J, Johnstone P, Yu G. Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 May;130(5):648-55. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.5.648.
- Schauwers K, Gillis S, Daemers K, De Beukelaer C, De Ceulaer G, Yperman M, Govaerts PJ. Normal hearing and language development in a deaf-born child. Otol Neurotol. 2004 Nov;25(6):924-9. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200411000-00011.
- Seeber BU, Baumann U, Fastl H. Localization ability with bimodal hearing aids and bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Sep;116(3):1698-709. doi: 10.1121/1.1776192.
- Stark T, Engel A, Borkowski G. [Bilateral cochlea implantation in varying duration of deafness]. Laryngorhinootologie. 2004 Jan;83(1):20-2. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814097. German.
- Tyler RS, Witt SA, Dunn CC. Trade-offs between better hearing and better cosmetics. Am J Audiol. 2004 Dec;13(2):193-9. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2004/024).
- van Hoesel RJ. Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol. 2004 Jul-Aug;9(4):234-46. doi: 10.1159/000078393.
- Au DK, Hui Y, Wei WI. Superiority of bilateral cochlear implantation over unilateral cochlear implantation in tone discrimination in chinese patients. Am J Otolaryngol. 2003 Jan-Feb;24(1):19-23. doi: 10.1053/ajot.2003.8.
- Kong W, Yu L, Xu Y, Yue J, Xiong X, Zhu L, Duan J. [Benefit of bilateral cochlear implantation on congenital prelingually deafened Chinese-speaking children]. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2003 Oct;17(10):577-9. Chinese.
- Caleffe-Schenck, N, Franz, D. (2004). Checklist of Auditory Communication Skills. Volta Review 104(3): 175-196.
- Semel, E, Wiig, E, Secord, W. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Fourth Edition. San Antonio, Texas: The Psychological Corporation
- Stark, T, Müller, J, Vischer, M, Schön, F, Senn, P, Engel, A, Kompis, M, Hildmann, H, Helms, J. (2002). Multicenter study on bilateral cochlear implantation. In Kubo, T, Takahashi, Y, Iwaki, T, (eds.) Cochlear implants - an update. The Hague: Kugler.
- Goldman, R, Fristoe, M. (2000). Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation Second Edition. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service.
- In Kim, C, Chang, S, Lim, D, (eds). Updates in cochlear implantation. Adv. Otorhinolarygol, Basel: Karger.
- Lawson, D, Wilson, B, Zerbi, M, Finley, C. (1999). Fourth quarterly progress report: Speech processors for auditory prostheses. NIH Contract N01-DC-8-2105.
- Schön, F, Mueller, J, Helms, J. (1999). Results of bilateral cochlear implantation. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 156:106.
- Lawson, D, Zerbi, M, Wilson, B. (1998). First quarterly progress report: Speech processors for auditory prostheses. NIH Contract N01-DC-8-2105.
- Dunn, L, Dunn, L. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Third Edition. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service.
- Williams, K. (1997). Expressive Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service.
- Kaufman, N. (1995). Kaufman Speech Praxis Test for Children. Detroit, Michigan: Wayne State University Press.
- Fenson, L, Dale, P, Resnick, J, Thal, D, Bates, E, Hartung, J, Pethick, S, Reilly, J. (1993). MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: User's Guide and Technical Manual. Baltimore, Maryland: Paul H. Brokes Publishing Company.
- Reynell, J, Gruber, C. (1990). Reynell Developmental Language Scales. Los Angeles, California: Western Psychological Services.
- Jerger, S, Jerger, J. (1984). Pediatric Speech Intelligibility Test. St. Louis, Missouri: Auditec of St. Louis.
- Erber, N. (1982). Auditory Training. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association.
- Haskins, H. (1949). A phonetically balanced test of speech discrimination for children. Master's Theis. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
- Ramsden R, Greenham P, O'Driscoll M, Mawman D, Proops D, Craddock L, Fielden C, Graham J, Meerton L, Verschuur C, Toner J, McAnallen C, Osborne J, Doran M, Gray R, Pickerill M. Evaluation of bilaterally implanted adult subjects with the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Otol Neurotol. 2005 Sep;26(5):988-98. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000185075.58199.22.
- Schoen F, Mueller J, Helms J, Nopp P. Sound localization and sensitivity to interaural cues in bilateral users of the Med-El Combi 40/40+cochlear implant system. Otol Neurotol. 2005 May;26(3):429-37. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000169772.16045.86.
- Long CJ, Eddington DK, Colburn HS, Rabinowitz WM. Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Sep;114(3):1565-74. doi: 10.1121/1.1603765.
- Tyler RS, Dunn CC, Witt SA, Preece JP. Update on bilateral cochlear implantation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Oct;11(5):388-93. doi: 10.1097/00020840-200310000-00014.
- van Hoesel RJ, Tyler RS. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Mar;113(3):1617-30. doi: 10.1121/1.1539520.
- Vermeire K, Brokx JP, Van de Heyning PH, Cochet E, Carpentier H. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003 Jan;67(1):67-70. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(02)00286-0.
- Wilson BS, Lawson DT, Muller JM, Tyler RS, Kiefer J. Cochlear implants: some likely next steps. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2003;5:207-49. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.5.040202.121645. Epub 2003 Apr 16.
- Au, D., Hui, Y., Wei, W, & Wong, B. (2002). Speech recognition between bilaterally and unilaterally cochlear implanted and hearing aid fitted users. In Kubo, T., Takahashi Y., & Iwaki, T. (Ed.) Cochlear implants - an update. The Hague: Kugler.
- Gantz BJ, Tyler RS, Rubinstein JT, Wolaver A, Lowder M, Abbas P, Brown C, Hughes M, Preece JP. Binaural cochlear implants placed during the same operation. Otol Neurotol. 2002 Mar;23(2):169-80. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200203000-00012.
- Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH, Barton GR, Bloor KE. A cost-utility scenario analysis of bilateral cochlear implantation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Nov;128(11):1255-62. doi: 10.1001/archotol.128.11.1255.
- Mawman DJ, Ramsden RT, O'Driscoll M, Adams T, Saeed SR. Bilateral cochlear implantation--a case report. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;57:360-3. doi: 10.1159/000059132. No abstract available.
- Mueller J, Schoen F, Helms J. Bilateral cochlear implant--new aspects for the future? Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;57:22-7. doi: 10.1159/000059172. No abstract available.
- Lawson, D., Wilson, B., Zerbi, M., & Finley, C. (1999). Fourth Quarterly Progress Report. NIH Contract N01-DC-8-2105. Retrieved from http://npp.ninds.nih.gov/ProgressReports/Speech ProcessorsforAuditoryProstheses%20DC82105/SpeechProcessorsWilson4DC82105.pdf
- van Hoesel, R. J. M., & Clark, G. M. (1999). Speech results with a bilateral multi-channel cochlear implant subject for spatially separated signal and noise. Australian Journal of Audiology, 21, 23-28.
- Müller, J., Schön, F., & Helms J. (1998). Binaural cochlear implantation: a case report discussing preliminary results. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 255, 38.
- Lawson DT, Wilson BS, Zerbi M, van den Honert C, Finley CC, Farmer JC Jr, McElveen JT Jr, Roush PA. Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor. Am J Otol. 1998 Nov;19(6):758-61.
- Lawson, D., Zerbi, M., & Wilson, B. (1998). First Quarterly Progress Report. NIH Contract N01-DC-8-2105. Retrieved from http://npp.ninds.nih.gov/ProgressReports/SpeechProcessorsfor AuditoryProstheses%20DC82105/qpr1/qpr1a.html
- van Hoesel RJ, Clark GM. Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Jul;102(1):495-507. doi: 10.1121/1.419611.
- Lawson, D., Wilson, B., Zerbi, M., & Finley, C. (1996). Fifth Quarterly Progress Report. NIH Contract N01-DC-5-2103. Retrieved from http://npp.ninds.nih.gov/ProgressReports/Speech ProcessorsforAuditoryProstheses%20DC52103/qpr5/qpr5.html.
- Van Hoesel RJ, Clark GM. Fusion and lateralization study with two binaural cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995 Sep;166:233-5.
- van Hoesel RJ, Tong YC, Hollow RD, Clark GM. Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Dec;94(6):3178-89. doi: 10.1121/1.407223.
- Green JD Jr, Mills DM, Bell BA, Luxford WM, Tonokawa LL. Binaural cochlear implants. Am J Otol. 1992 Nov;13(6):502-6.
- Pelizzone M, Kasper A, Montandon P. Binaural interaction in a cochlear implant patient. Hear Res. 1990 Oct;48(3):287-90. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90069-2.
- Balkany T, Boggess W, Dinner B. Binaural cochlear implantation: comparison of 3M/House and Nucleus 22 devices with evidence of sensory integration. Laryngoscope. 1988 Oct;98(10):1040-3. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198810000-00002.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2004
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2009
Study Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 30, 2008
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 31, 2008
First Posted (Estimate)
November 2, 2008
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 25, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 26, 2018
Last Verified
April 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MED-EL NA 013
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.