Use of Interventional MRI for Implantation of Deep Brain Stimulator Electrodes (iMRI)

December 16, 2019 updated by: University of California, San Francisco
The purpose of this study is to gather observational data on an already FDA-approved implantation technique for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in which the entire surgery is performed within an MRI scanner ("interventional MRI", or iMRI). With this surgical technique, the patient is fully asleep (under general anesthesia) during DBS implantation. The standard method for the placement of deep brain stimulators does not use MRI during the actual DBS placement. The standard method involves placement of a rigid frame on the patient's head, performance of a short MRI scan, transport to the operating room, placement of the DBS electrodes in the operating room, and return to the MRI suite for another MR to confirm correct electrode placement. In the standard method, the patient must be awake for 2-4 hours in the operating room to have "brain mapping" performed, where the brain target is confirmed by passing "microelectrodes" (thin wires) into the brain to record its electrical activity. In the standard method, general anesthesia is not required. With the iMRI technique, the surgery is guided entirely by MRI images performed multiple times as the DBS electrode is advanced. This eliminates the need for the patient to be awake, and eliminates the need for passing microelectrodes into the brain before placing the permanent DBS electrode.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an increasingly common surgical technique for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and dystonia. The current technical approach to DBS implantation involves frame-based stereotaxy. In this method, a stereotactic frame is rigidly fixed to the patient's skull, an MRI is obtained, an anatomic target is identified, and the coordinates of the target in stereotactic space are calculated. Instruments are mounted on the stereotactic frame that point to the calculated coordinate. However, due to the inherent inaccuracies in standard frame-based stereotaxy, a complex 6-hour procedure then ensues to "map" the brain target with microelectrodes, place the lead, and return to the MR unit to confirm proper placement.

The goal of this project is to gather observational data on the iMRI DBS implantation technique and clinical outcomes. This already FDA-approved implantation technique for DBS will take place entirely within the Phillips 1.5T and a Siemens 3T open magnet MRI machine. Prior to study initiation, instrumentation and MR protocols were tested using a phantom head. In the proposed project, subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus DBS implantations will be performed bilaterally in patients with Parkinson's disease or dystonia. Patients will be under general anesthesia. Targeting and lead verification are performed with imaging alone, without physiologic mapping. Data is to be gathered on the following: operative time, degree of benefit with bilateral implantation (changes in standard rating scales of motor disability), DBS voltage requirements, complications), and electrode location by MR. These measures will be compared with our historical controls, previously entered into our research database, in which electrodes were placed by the standard methods. We expect that the use of near real time MR will improve the speed and accuracy of DBS implantation, and eliminate the need for invasive physiological monitoring.

All of the study participants will be getting iMRI DBS implantation as a part of their standard of care and agree to have additional study data collected

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94121
        • San Francisco VA Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Parkinson's disease, eligible for DBS

Description

Parkinson's Disease

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of idiopathic PD with clinically significant motor fluctuations despite maximized anti-Parkinsonian therapy. This will be based on medical history, neurologic examination (the presence of at least 2 of the following: resting tremor, rigidity, or bradykinesia), and response to anti-Parkinsonian therapy.
  2. Approximately 5 years' duration, relative to the date of surgery, since diagnosis of PD.
  3. Age >20 inclusive, on date of surgery.
  4. The subject is ambulatory in their best on time (not wheelchair bound).
  5. The subject is medically able to undergo the surgery as determined by clinical and laboratory evaluations and any other evaluations that are part of the standard practice at the institution in which the subject is to undergo surgery (e.g., subjects will have normal coagulation tests and normal platelet levels).
  6. The subject is expected to be able to comply with and understand the required visit schedule and all required tests and procedures.
  7. Signed IRB-approved informed consent is obtained before any study-specific procedure, including assessments required during the eligibility evaluation period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. In the judgment of the investigator, a history of any clinically significant medical, psychiatric, or laboratory abnormality for which participation in the study would pose a safety risk to the subject.
  2. History of treatment of PD by any procedure involving intracranial surgery or implantation of a device.
  3. MRI of the brain within 12 months before the surgery which demonstrates an intracranial abnormality that would contraindicate surgery (e.g. stroke, tumor, vascular abnormality affecting the DBS target area).
  4. Any disorder that precludes a surgical procedure (e.g., signs of sepsis or inadequately treated infection) or alters wound healing.
  5. Receipt of antiplatelet agents for at least 10 days prior surgery.
  6. Significant cognitive impairment based on investigator assessment during the eligibility evaluation period.
  7. History of significant psychiatric illness, epilepsy, or Alzheimer's disease.
  8. Active drug or alcohol abuse.
  9. Pregnancy or lack of effective contraception in women of childbearing potential defined as one year post-menopausal or surgically sterile.
  10. Treatment with non anti-Parkinsonian agents (e.g., atypical neuroleptics) that may affect symptoms of PD within 60 days before entering the study.
  11. Any medical disability (e.g., severe degenerative arthritis, compromised nutritional state, severe peripheral neuropathy) that would interfere with the assessment of safety and efficacy in this trial.
  12. Inability to follow-up with post-operative study visits
  13. Inability to speak or read English

Dystonia Inclusion Criteria

  1. Dystonia diagnosed by a movement disorders neurologist
  2. Significant functional impairment despite optimal medical management, including failed botulinum toxin therapy if appropriate
  3. Age >20 years inclusive, on date of surgery.
  4. The subject is medically able to undergo the surgery as determined by clinical and laboratory evaluations and any other evaluations that are part of the standard practice at the institution in which the subject is to undergo surgery (e.g., subjects will have normal coagulation tests and normal platelet levels).
  5. The subject is able to comply with and understand the required visit schedule and all required tests and procedures.
  6. Signed IRB-approved informed consent is obtained before any study-specific procedure, including assessments required during the eligibility evaluation period.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Any disorder that precludes a surgical procedure (e.g., signs of sepsis or inadequately treated infection) or alters wound healing.
  2. Receipt of antiplatelet agents for at least 10 days prior surgery.
  3. Significant cognitive impairment based on investigator assessment during the eligibility evaluation period.
  4. History of significant psychiatric illness, epilepsy, or Alzheimer's disease.
  5. Active drug or alcohol abuse.
  6. Pregnancy or lack of effective contraception in women of childbearing potential defined as one year post-menopausal or surgically sterile.
  7. Any medical disability (e.g., severe degenerative arthritis, compromised nutritional state, severe peripheral neuropathy) that would interfere with the assessment of safety and efficacy in this trial.
  8. Inability to follow-up with post-operative study visits
  9. Inability to speak or read English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
iMRI
DBS implantation will be performed entirely within a Phillips 3T MRI scanner
Other Names:
  • interventional MR
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Parkinson's disease: The degree of benefit from baseline off medication UPDRS(part III) motor score to postoperative off medication scores at 12 months with stimulation on.
Time Frame: 12 months post-surgery
12 months post-surgery
Dystonia: The percent change from baseline in the Burk-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia rating scale movement subscore to the 12 month postoperative subscore
Time Frame: 12 months post-surgery
12 months post-surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philip Starr, M.D., Ph.D., University of California, San Francisco; SFVAMC
  • Principal Investigator: Paul Larson, M.D., University of California, San Francisco; SFVAMC
  • Principal Investigator: Jill L Ostrem, MD, University of California San Francisco, SFVAMC
  • Principal Investigator: Alastair J Martin, PhD, University of California, San Francisco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 18, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe