Colloids in Severe Trauma (CIST)

November 23, 2009 updated by: University of the Philippines

Colloids in Severe Trauma: A Multi-Center Pilot Study of "Crystalloid Only" or "Crystalloid + Colloid" Volume Resuscitation in Trauma Patients (CIST)

Background:

Fluid resuscitation is a cornerstone of the initial management of the critically injured trauma patient yet there are numerous controversies surrounding this very common practice. As a result, these controversies have been the subject of numerous clinical trials, evidence-based guidelines and systematic reviews.

With the publication of the landmark SAFE Study the equipoise between the 2 treatments (which were representative solutions for colloid and crystalloids respectively), 4% albumin and saline, was established. This has however been brought into further doubt by the paucity of data on the use of hydroxyethylstarches (HES), which are less costly and have less side effects than albumin, in trauma. More recent findings by Gruen and colleagues have shown that as much as 5% of all trauma deaths are the result of fluid overload based on the North American fluid management model for trauma (pure crystalloid fluid management).

A meta-analysis done by Kern and Shoemaker found that supranormal fluid resuscitation with crystalloids is beneficial when given before the onset of organ failure in critically ill surgical patients. Balogh and colleagues found out that when supranormal fuid resuscitation with crystalloids was applied to victims of severe trauma, this resulted in a statistically significant increase in the incidence of mortality, multiple organ failure, intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). More recently, Kirkpatrick and colleagues reviewed and defined a 'secondary' ACS as a direct result of fluid resuscitation. They concluded that "excess resuscitation with crystalloid fluids might be harming patients and contributing to an increased occurrence of ACS."

This study will serve as a pilot to test the hypothesis that there will be significant differences in clinical outcomes for patients with severe trauma treated with colloid (HES) plus crystalloid and crystalloid only fluid management regimens, most notably the incidence of IAH and ACS.

It is hoped that the hybrid colloid (HES) plus crystalloid fluid management regimen will provide a means to avoid the untoward fluid overload and/or other complications of pure crystalloid fluid management and the costs/complications of albumin administration.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Metro Manila
      • Manila, Metro Manila, Philippines
        • Jose Reyes Memorial Medical Center
    • NCR
      • Quezon City, NCR, Philippines
        • East Avenue Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 18-65 years
  • Body weight: more than 40 kg
  • Trauma patients with onset of trauma ≤ 48h prior to assessment for inclusion in study, clinically judged to be in hemorrhagic shock by the attending surgeon and with 2 or more of the following characteristics:

    • Penetrating or blunt etiology with hemodynamic instability at ER or intra-operatively
    • Severely injured with Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15
    • Hypotension defined as either ≥ 10mmHg change in SBP or MAP ≤ 65 mmHg or needing vasopressors (dopamine ≥ 5 mcg/kg/min or norepinephrine at any dose) at the time of admission/referral
    • Hypoperfusion defined as base deficit ≥ 4 mmol/L

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known severe congestive heart failure (EF ≤ 35%)
  • Known chronic renal, liver or pancreatic disease
  • Known severe respiratory diseases e.g., TB, COPD, asthma
  • Known coagulopathy or bleeding tendency
  • Known allergy to Hydroxyethyl starch
  • Participation in a clinical drug trial within the last 2 months
  • Known Pregnancy or lactation
  • Severe traumatic brain injury GCS < 9
  • Advanced cancer (stage IV or metastatic disease)
  • Patients receiving immunosuppressive drugs
  • Do-not-resuscitate status
  • Advanced directives restricting implementation of the protocol
  • Skeletal deformity, scarring, infection, gross contamination or previous surgery at the CVP insertion site
  • Severe hypoxemia if the CVP is to be inserted in the subclavian area
  • Known active gastrointestinal hemorrhage
  • Concomitant drug poisoning

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Crystalloid only
patients will receive crystalloid fluids only for volume therapy of severe trauma
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Colloid + Crystalloid arm
Goal directed volume therapy for severe trauma resuscitation
Goals directed volume therapy for severe trauma resuscitation
Other Names:
  • Voluven

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Intraabdominal hypertension
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
abdominal compartment syndrome
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rafael J Consunji, MD MPH, University of the Philippines

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 29, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 25, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2009

Last Verified

November 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Severe Trauma

Clinical Trials on tetrastarch (Voluven)

3
Subscribe