Nurse-Provided Care or Standard Care in Treating Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

September 29, 2010 updated by: City of Hope Medical Center

A Standardized Nursing Intervention Protocol for Pancreatic Cancer as a Chronic Illness

RATIONALE: Meeting with a nurse to assess symptoms and quality of life may be more effective than standard care in treating patients with pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying nurse-provided care to see how well it works compared with standard care in treating patients with pancreatic cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

  • To test the effects of an advanced practice nurse (APN) standardized nursing-intervention protocol (SNIP) model vs usual care on overall quality of life (QOL) and psychological distress from initial treatment to 6 months post diagnosis for patients with pancreatic cancer.
  • To compare symptom control in these patients.
  • To compare geriatric assessment outcomes in these patients.
  • To test the effects of the SNIP intervention as compared to the usual care group on resource use by these patients.
  • To test the effects of SNIP on patients' and clinicians' satisfaction with care.
  • To describe the effects of SNIP on patients' management of transitions from one phase of chronic illness to another.
  • To identify subgroups of these patients who benefit most from the SNIP in relation to sociodemographic characteristics, disease/treatment factors, and geriatric assessment predictors.
  • To obtain feedback from clinicians regarding interpretation of findings and application to the routine care of pancreatic cancer patients.

OUTLINE: Patients are sequentially enrolled to 1 of 2 groups. Group 1 is enrolled during months 4-21 and group 2 during months 25-54.

  • Group 1 (usual care): Patient questionnaires are administered at baseline and at 3 and 6 months. The clinicians' satisfaction with care is also evaluated.
  • Group 2 (advanced practice nurse [APN] intervention): Patients are accrued by an APN. Patients meet with the APN periodically to assess their physical well-being including ambulatory care needed, care of physical symptoms (i.e., pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting), and psychological well-being. Questionnaires are administered at baseline and at 3 and 6 months.

In both groups, questionnaires include the FACT-Hep, Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, Psychological Distress Thermometer, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, and Patient Satisfaction with Intervention. Clinicians also complete questionnaires. Patients' medical charts are also reviewed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

125

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Duarte, California, United States, 91010-3000
        • City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (all stages)

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Admitted to City of Hope National Medical Center

    • Resides within a 30-mile radius of the medical center
  • No prior cancer

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • No prior therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Quality of life, psychological distress, symptom relief, geriatric assessment outcome, and resource use at 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Long-term impact at 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marcia Grant, RN, DNSc, FAAN, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

May 15, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 1, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2010

Last Verified

September 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on medical chart review

3
Subscribe