Postoperative Pain and Functional Patient Outcomes After Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

April 19, 2016 updated by: David R. Drover, Stanford University

The Effect of Preemptive Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block on Anesthetic Requirements, Postoperative Pain and Functional Patient Outcomes After Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

The aim of the study is to quantify postoperative pain after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and investigate whether preemptive analgesia may positively impact intraoperative anesthetic management, decrease patient postoperative pain and discomfort, and improve patient functional outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) with local anesthetic is used to treat facial pain and headache of various etiologies and has been widely used during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether preemptive SPGB may positively impact postoperative pain and functional outcomes after FESS.

A prospective, double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study was performed. 60 patients (18 to 70 yrs), undergoing general anesthesia for bilateral FESS, were randomly assigned to receive SPGB with either 2 ml 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 (BP, treatment group) or normal saline (NS, control group). SPGB was performed preemptively 10 min before the start of surgery. Pre- and post operative (day#0, day#7, day#30) visual analogue pain scale, SNOT-20, CT & Endoscopic scores were compared between the two groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The study subjects will be 18-70 year old.
  2. The subjects will be American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I and II patients.
  3. Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, presenting for bilateral functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
  4. The subjects should understand informed consent and study instructions, AND 5. The subjects should not participate in any other research protocols.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with pre-existing chronic facial pain not related to chronic rhinosinusitis.
  2. Patients with pre-existing chronic pain of different etiology.
  3. Patients taking prescription pain medications.
  4. Patients taking antidepressant medications.
  5. Patients taking over-the-counter pain medications within 48 hours of scheduled surgery.
  6. Patients in whom oral opioid-containing analgesics would be contraindicated postoperatively.
  7. Patients with a known or suspected genetic susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia, or known sensitivity to Desflurane or other halogenated agents.
  8. Patients with the history of arrhythmias or significant coronary artery disease.
  9. Patients with psychological disorders.
  10. Patients who are unable to understand the questionnaires or the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores.
  11. Patients with the history of substance or alcohol abuse.
  12. Patients with compromised renal and liver function.
  13. Patients with abnormal coagulation status or platelet count less than 100,000.
  14. Pregnant patients.
  15. Patients with an allergy to Bupivacaine, Lidocaine or Epinephrine.
  16. Other patients that may be excluded by the investigator, based on medical history and physical examination

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1 - Bupivacaine Block
3 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine with Epi 1:100,000 (A block)
Bupivacaine local anesthesia block prior to start of FESS procedure.
Other Names:
  • Local Block
Placebo Comparator: 2 - Placebo
Normal saline with Epi 1:100,000 (B block)
placebo is identical in appearance in comparison to active drug.
Other Names:
  • Placebo saline injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain Assessed on Standard VAS Scale
Time Frame: VAS Pain Score at 7 days
Post-operative quality of recovery and pain followed up to 1 month. Visual Analog Pain (VAS) was recorded by the patient on a 10-centimeter line to mark an estimated pain score that could be from zero (0) to ten (10). Zero would indicate no pain while a score of 10 would be the worse pain possible.
VAS Pain Score at 7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SNOT-20 Surgical Outcome Score
Time Frame: 1-day

This measures uses a 20 item surgical assessment tool to assess surgical field. This assessment score is the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test, SNOT-20. Patients were completed this validated sinus symptom questionnaire. The average magnitude score for the 20 items is calculated. Each item of the 20-question assessment is scored from 1 to 5 where 1 is less severe and 5 is a maximum as described by that particular symptom score. The final score is reported as a mean with a range of 0 (zero) to 5 (no units).

ref. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 126 (2002), pp. 41-47

1-day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David R. Drover, Stanford University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

June 25, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 19, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine Block

Subscribe