Vitamin D Needs of Early Adolescent Children

September 23, 2015 updated by: Dr. Richard D. Lewis, University of Georgia

Supplemental Vitamin D and Functional Outcomes in Early Adolescence

While a large percentage of children have low blood vitamin D levels, the significance of these low levels and the impact on health is unclear. The purpose of this project is to determine the effects of varying doses of vitamin D supplementation over 12 weeks on blood indicators of health in white and black children, aged 9 to 13 years, from both the northern and southern US.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Vitamin D intakes in children do not meet current US Dietary Reference Intake recommendations and emerging evidence suggests that a significant number of children, particularly those with darker skin pigmentation, have inadequate levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]. The optimum level of circulating 25(OH)D has not been clearly defined in children, nor is it known what functional outcome measures are ideal for defining this level, or if these requirements would differ by race. Graded doses of vitamin D3 supplementation will be used in this dual-site, 12-week trial. The investigators hypothesize that a dose-response relationship will be observed between vitamin D supplementation and intermediate endpoints of skeletal health, and that race will modify these responses.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

323

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Athens, Georgia, United States, 30602
        • The University of Georgia Dept of Foods & Nutrition
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana University School of Medicine
      • West Lafayette, Indiana, United States, 47907
        • Purdue University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

9 years to 13 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy
  • Non-Hispanic
  • Male, 10-13 years of age or female 9-11 years of age
  • Within genitalia or breast stage 2/3
  • Willing to provide blood/urine samples
  • Free from taking vitamin, mineral or herbal supplements
  • Able to swallow tablets

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Menarche (females)
  • Known bone diseases or disease known to influence bone metabolism (e.g. cerebral palsy, intestinal malabsorption, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis)
  • Known growth disorder
  • The use of medications that influence bone metabolism (e.g. corticosteroids, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) medications).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
placebo tablet
vitamin D3 supplementation at 400 IU vs 1,000 IU vs 2,000 IU vs 4,000 IU vs placebo for 12-weeks
Experimental: 400 IU
Vitamin D3 tablet, 400 IU
vitamin D3 supplementation at 400 IU vs 1,000 IU vs 2,000 IU vs 4,000 IU vs placebo for 12-weeks
Experimental: 1,000 IU
Vitamin D3 tablet, 1,000 IU
vitamin D3 supplementation at 400 IU vs 1,000 IU vs 2,000 IU vs 4,000 IU vs placebo for 12-weeks
Experimental: 2,000 IU
Vitamin D3 tablet, 2,000 IU
vitamin D3 supplementation at 400 IU vs 1,000 IU vs 2,000 IU vs 4,000 IU vs placebo for 12-weeks
Experimental: 4,000 IU
Vitamin D3 tablet, 4,000 IU
vitamin D3 supplementation at 400 IU vs 1,000 IU vs 2,000 IU vs 4,000 IU vs placebo for 12-weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
serum 25(OH)D
Time Frame: 0 weeks
0 weeks
PTH
Time Frame: 0 weeks
0 weeks
1,25(OH)2D
Time Frame: 0 weeks
0 weeks
fractional calcium absorption
Time Frame: 0 weeks
0 weeks
biochemical markers of bone turnover
Time Frame: 0 weeks
0 weeks
serum 25(OH)D
Time Frame: 3 weeks
3 weeks
serum 25(OH)D
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks
serum 25(OH)D
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
serum 25(OH)D
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
PTH
Time Frame: 3 weeks
3 weeks
PTH
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks
PTH
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
PTH
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
1,25(OH)2D
Time Frame: 3 weeks
3 weeks
1,25(OH)2D
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks
1,25(OH)2D
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
1,25(OH)2D
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
fractional calcium absorption
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
biochemical markers of bone turnover
Time Frame: 3 weeks
3 weeks
biochemical markers of bone turnover
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks
biochemical markers of bone turnover
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
biochemical markers of bone turnover
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
body composition
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
sunlight exposure
Time Frame: 0 weeks
0 weeks
dietary data
Time Frame: 0 weeks
0 weeks
physical activity data
Time Frame: 0 weeks
0 weeks
serum and urinary calcium
Time Frame: 0 weeks
0 weeks
body composition
Time Frame: 0 weeks
0 weeks
sunlight exposure
Time Frame: 3 weeks
3 weeks
sunlight exposure
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks
sunlight exposure
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
sunlight exposure
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
dietary data
Time Frame: 3 weeks
3 weeks
dietary data
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks
dietary data
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
dietary data
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
physical activity data
Time Frame: 3 weeks
3 weeks
physical activity data
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks
physical activity data
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
physical activity data
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
serum and urinary calcium
Time Frame: 3 weeks
3 weeks
serum and urinary calcium
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks
serum and urinary calcium
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks
serum and urinary calcium
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
body composition
Time Frame: 3 weeks
3 weeks
body composition
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks
body composition
Time Frame: 9 weeks
9 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard D Lewis, PhD, The University of Georgia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

July 2, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 25, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2015

Last Verified

September 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe