Intraosseous Infusion of Unrelated Cord Blood Grafts

November 26, 2013 updated by: John Horan, Emory University

A Pilot Study of Intraosseous Infusion of Unrelated Cord Blood Grafts

In this trial the investigators seek to determine if injecting cord blood cells directly into the bone marrow (intraosseous injection), rather than infusing them intravenously, can improve engraftment. The rational for doing this is that most hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) infused intravenously never reach the bone marrow, getting trapped by other organs, such as the lungs, instead. The potential advantage of intraosseous infusion is suggested by studies in rodents that have demonstrated that in HSC transplants where the cell dose is limiting intraosseous injection is a more effective route of administration. The safety of intraosseous injections, in general, is underscored by the vast experience using intraosseous injections for resuscitation of critically ill children. The safety of injecting HSCs intraosseously has been demonstrated in a clinical trial of transplanting bone marrow cells.

To safeguard against problems that might result, if intraosseous infusion fails to improve engraftment in this trial, the investigators will integrate a recently introduced strategy proven to improve engraftment-the transplantation of two cord blood units. Transplanting two unrelated cord blood units by intravenous infusion has been shown to improve engraftment (although there is still room for improvement). In this trial one unit will be injected intraosseously and the other unit will be infused intravenously.

This study is being conducted as a forerunner to a larger, multi-center trial. The investigators intend to enroll five patients over 1-2 years.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hematopoietic (blood forming) stem cells (HSCs) reside primarily in the bone marrow. Traditionally, HSCs have been obtained directly from the bone marrow. Transplants using cells obtained this way are referred to as bone marrow transplants. HSCs also circulate in the blood. Transplants using cells obtained from the blood of children and adults are referred to as peripheral blood stem cell transplants. The blood of fetuses is especially rich in HSCs and these cells can be easily collected at birth from the placenta. Transplants using these cells are called cord blood transplants. Although HSCs can be collected from various sites, all HSC transplants, regardless of the source, are given to recipients by intravenous infusion. The transplanted HSCs then migrate to the bone marrow.

Over the past ten years unrelated cord blood transplantation has become an accepted alternative to bone marrow transplantation. African-Americans and other minorities, who are underrepresented in the National Marrow Donor Program, have benefited particularly from this. In infants and young children cord blood transplantation appears to be as effective as bone marrow transplantation. In older children, adolescents and adults, however, cord blood transplantation has not been as effective, primarily because most cord blood units provide an insufficient number of cells to ensure prompt and reliable engraftment ("taking" of the transplanted cells in the recipient's bone marrow).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 60 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 36 months to 60 years old (YO)
  2. No prior autologous or allogeneic transplant
  3. Karnofsky performance score or Lansky Play-Performance of at least 80

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age < 36 months or > 60 YO
  2. creatinine clearance or nuclear medicine GFR of < 50 mL/min
  3. cardiac ejection fraction < 50%
  4. bilirubin > 2 × upper limit of normal or ALT > 4 × upper limit of normal or unresolved veno-occlusive disease
  5. Pulmonary carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO), adjusted for Hgb < 50%
  6. Karnofsky performance score or Lansky Play-Performance Scale <80
  7. Uncontrolled viral, bacterial, or fungal infection at the time of study enrollment
  8. Seropositive for HIV
  9. Availability of a willing and well HLA matched related (genotypically identical or mismatched at a single allele or antigen defined by typing at HLA A, B, C and DRB1 loci) donor
  10. Availability of a willing and well HLA matched unrelated (allele matched or mismatched at a single allele defined by allele level typing for HLA A, B, C and DRB1 loci) adult blood or marrow donor
  11. Availability of an umbilical cord blood unit, which provides at least a 4/6 HLA match as defined above and ≥ 5.0 * 107 NC/Kg (cryopreserved)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Receive two cord blood units. One administered by intraosseous infusion and the other by intravenous infusion. The second unit is being given as a safeguard, but will also allow the researchers to directly compare engraftment between intravenously and intraosseously infused cord blood units.
Receive two cord blood units. One administered by intraosseous infusion and the other by intravenous infusion. The second unit is being given as a safeguard, but will also allow the researchers to directly compare engraftment between intravenously and intraosseously infused cord blood units.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Compare the rapidity of myeloid engraftment of intraosseously and intravenously administered unrelated cord blood grafts.
Time Frame: 1 year after last patient enrolled
1 year after last patient enrolled

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Obtain preliminary data using flow cytometric analysis to assess the importance of graft associated variables that may affect engraftment.
Time Frame: 1 year after last patient enrolled
1 year after last patient enrolled

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Horan, MD, Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

August 28, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 27, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe