Electronic Feedback on Diabetic Care to General Practitioners

November 6, 2009 updated by: University of Aarhus

Development and Evaluation of Electronic Feedback, a Tool for Quality Assurance of the Diabetic Care in General Practice

The aim of this study is to determine whether electronic feedback to general practitioners on quality of Type 2-Diabetes care increases the quality of care measured on process and outcome measures contained in the national guidelines. Effect evaluation will be performed using a mixed method design.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background: In an effort to optimize diabetes care in general practice, an electronical feedback system has been developed. The system will be evaluated both quantitative and qualitative.

Method: The general practitioners (GP´s) of the Region of Southern Denmark have been randomised to either admission or no admission to the electronic feedback system. The system was launched 1/3-2007 and ran for one year prior to evaluation.

Quantitative evaluation by assessment of the following end-points: Patients Hba1c-level, number of patients who have had their hba1c-level measured within the last year, cholesterol-level and number of patients who have had an eye examination within the last year.

Qualitative evaluation by interviewing GP´s who have had admission to the system.

Qualitative data have been collected through interviews with intervention GPs, designed to uncover motivational factors as well as barriers concerning the use of feedback on chronic care in general practice. Data are being analyzed.

Quantitative data are being gathered. Perspective: This project will shed light on the value of electronic feedback systems within chronic care in general practice.

Based on this project it will be possible to set up a system for automatic electronic monitoring and feedback of the quality of care in general practice, taking motivational factors of the GP s into account during implementation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2458

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8000
        • Dept. of General Medicine, Institute of Public Health, Aarhus University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Prevalent Type 2-diabetes as confirmed by Primary Care Physician.
  • Patient alive throughout the intervention period.
  • GP actively working throughout the intervention period (not retired).

Exclusion criteria:

  • death during intervention
  • moved out of geographic area during intervention
  • GP retired during intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Admission to electronic feedback system
An electronic feedback system was introduced in randomized primary care clinics providing an overview of quality of care. The intervention ran for 15 months.
Other Names:
  • Electronic feedback system
  • Decission support system
No Intervention: control
Control group. No special attention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Outcome and process measures from the danish diabetes guideline
Time Frame: 1/3 2007-1/6 2008
1/3 2007-1/6 2008

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Interview data concerning the impact of the electronic feedback system in the intervention clinics
Time Frame: 1/3 2007-1/6 2008
1/3 2007-1/6 2008

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Torsten Lauritzen, MD, Dr. Med., Professor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 9, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2009

Last Verified

November 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2008-41-2792

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Electronic feedback system on diabetes care

3
Subscribe