Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Elortinib vs Gefitinib in Advanced NSCLC With EGFR Exon 19 or 21 Mutations

February 28, 2017 updated by: Yi-Long Wu, Chinese Society of Lung Cancer

A Randomized, Controlled Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Elortinib vs Gefitinib in Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Exon 19 or 21 Mutations

This is a randomized controlled trial to compare efficacy and safety between erlotinib and gefitinib in advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 19 or 21 mutations.Eligible patients were randomized to receive erlotinib or gefitinib in any line settings.The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients with stage IV NSCLC who have EGFR exon 19 or 21 mutations will randomized to received oral erlotinib 150mg or gefitinib 250mg once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Method of direct DNA sequencing of tumor tissue is used to analysis EGFR mutation status of exons 18-21. The response will be evaluated by RECIST criteria first month,second month and then repeat every 3 months after the beginning of the treatment weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

256

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
        • Guangdong General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB (wet) or IV NSCLC.
  • Patients with positive EGFR exon19 or exon21 mutation as confirmed by direct sequencing histologically.
  • Signing the informed consent form.
  • The vital organ functions are tolerant to therapy.
  • Have recovered to CTCAE2 grade below from toxicity of previous chemotherapy and radiotherapy
  • PS 0-2 scores.
  • Functional reserve of bone marrow is adequate, e.g. white blood cell count ≥3.0×109/L, planet count ≥90×109/L, and HB≥80×109/L.
  • Serum bilirubin is 2 times less than the upper limit of normal (ULN), ALT and AST are 3 times less than ULN; for liver metastases, ALT and AST need to be 5 times less than ULN; creatinine should be 2 times less than ULN.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent is not provided.
  • Women of pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Have difficulty in swallowing.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: erlotinib
erlotinib 150 mg oral till disease progression
study arm.erlotinib 150 mg oral till disease progression
Other Names:
  • Tarceva
Active Comparator: gefitinib
gefitinib 250mg oral till disease progression.
study arm.gefitinib 250 mg oral till disease progression
Other Names:
  • Iressa

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
progression-free survival
Time Frame: two years
two years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
overall survival
Time Frame: three years
three years
Safety events
Time Frame: two years
two years
Pharmacoeconomic
Time Frame: two years
two years
Response rate
Time Frame: one year
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wu Yi Long, MD, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

December 2, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thoracic Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on erlotinib

3
Subscribe