Bioavailability of Different n-3 Fatty Acid Formulations

December 6, 2011 updated by: M. Sc. Simone Schmidt, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover

Relative Bioavailability of Different n-3 Fatty Acid Formulations in Humans

The aim of this study is to examine differences in short term bioavailability between four n-3 FA formulations in healthy males.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The long-chain n-3 fatty acids (n-3 FAs) eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) are known to positively affect the lipid profile, vascular tone and blood coagulation. Moreover, EPA and DHA possess anti-inflammatory effects and play a central role in the functioning of the brain and central nervous system. Therefore, an increased EPA and DHA intake is highly recommend. However, it is unknown whether different chemical formulations of EPA + DHA rich supplements (re-esterified triglycerides, ethyl-esters, phospholipids) have identical bioavailability. The objective of this study is to examine differences in short term bioavailability between four n-3 FA formulations:

  • Supplement 1: EPA+DHA as re-esterified triglycerides (rTGs) from fish-oil uncoated capsules
  • Supplement 2: EPA+DHA as rTGs from fish-oil in gastric acid resistant (coated) capsules (GArTG)
  • Supplement 3: EPA+DHA as ethylesters (EE) from fish-oil uncoated capsules
  • Supplement 4: DHA+EPA as phospholipids from krill-oil, uncoated capsules (KPL)

The study preparations are certificated supplements and available on the market.

There are no comparative investigations, which analyzed the bioavailability of these four n-3 FA formulations in a similar design.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Lower Saxony
      • Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany, 30167
        • Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz University of Hanover

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 48 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • males,
  • 20-50 years,
  • Caucasian,
  • healthy,
  • body mass index (BMI) 20-28 kg/m²,
  • no medical treatment,
  • written confirmation of the subjects after detailed spoken and written explanation about the study contents,
  • ability and willingness of the participants to attend the investigator's orders (compliance of the study conditions, consumption of the study drugs according to the dosage commendation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • medical treatment (especially corticosteroids, anti-inflammatory drugs, blood lipids lowering drugs (e.g. statines, fibrates, bile acid exchanger resin, phytosterols)
  • taking any supplements with n-3 FAs, phytosterols, polyglucosamines (Chitosan) or other lipid binding ingredients
  • daily consumption of n-3 FAs rich fish (salmon, mackerel, herring)
  • heavy chronic diseases (tumors, diabetes typ 1, etc.), documented heart disease, documented blood clotting disorders, renal failure, liver diseases
  • documented blood clotting disorders and consumption of coagulation-inhibiting drugs (for example Marcumar, ASS)
  • allergy or intolerance to fish/fish oil or any of the study ingredients of the test products
  • chronic gastro-intestinal diseases (Colitis ulcerosa, Morbus Crohn, pancreatic insufficiency)
  • donation of blood in the last 6 weeks
  • routine consumption of laxative
  • alcohol-, drug- and/or medicament dependence
  • subjects who are not in agreement with the study conditions
  • refusal or rather reset of the consent from the subject
  • active participation in other investigational drug or device trial within the last 30 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Supplement 1
EPA+DHA as re-esterified triglycerides (rTGs) from fish-oil uncoated capsules
EPA+DHA as re-esterified triglycerides (rTGs) from fish-oil; uncoated capsules (4 per day); 2016 mg n3 fatty acids daily (1008 mg EPA and 672 mg DHA)
Other Names:
  • re-esterified triglycerides
Experimental: Supplement 2
EPA+DHA as rTGs from fish-oil in gastric acid resistant (coated) capsules (GArTG)
EPA+DHA as rTGs from fish-oil in gastric acid resistant (coated) capsules (GArTG); 4 capsules per day; 2016 mg n-3 fatty acids (1008 mg EPA and 672 mg DHA)
Other Names:
  • rTG in gastric acid resistant capsules
Experimental: Supplement 3
EPA+DHA as ethylesters (EE) from fish-oil uncoated capsules
EPA+DHA as ethylesters (EE) from fish-oil uncoated capsules (4 per day); 2016 mg n-3 fatty acids (1008 mg EPA and 672 mg DHA)
Other Names:
  • ethylesters
Experimental: Supplement 4
DHA+EPA as phospholipids from krill-oil, uncoated capsules (KPL)
DHA+EPA as phospholipids from krill-oil, uncoated capsules (KPL); 7 capsules per day; 2100 mg n-3 fatty acids (1050 mg EPA and 630 mg DHA)
Other Names:
  • phospholipids from krill-oil

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area under concentration time curve (AUC)
Time Frame: about 24 hours
Concentration of eicosapentanoiec acid (EPA) and docosahexanoiec acid (DHA) was measured at baseline and after 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours.
about 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area under concentration time curve (AUC)
Time Frame: about 48 and 72 hours
Concentration of eicosapentanoiec acid (EPA) and docosahexanoiec acid (DHA) was measured at baseline and after 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours.
about 48 and 72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

October 5, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 7, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2011

Last Verified

December 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GWLUH-002
  • GWLUH2010 (OTHER: 01)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Health

Clinical Trials on rTG

3
Subscribe