- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06241716
Ultrasound-assisted Versus Real-time Ultrasound-guided Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia in Elderly Patients
February 2, 2024 updated by: Tianzhu Liu, Tongji Hospital
Ultrasound-assisted Versus Real-time Ultrasound-guided Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia Via a Paramedian Approach in Elderly Patients: a Randomized Controlled Study
This study aims to compare the clinical effects of ultrasound-assisted localization and real-time ultrasound-guided combined spinal-epidural anesthesia via paramedian approach in elderly patients
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study aims to compare the clinical effects of ultrasound-assisted localization and real-time ultrasound-guided combined spinal-epidural anesthesia via paramedian approach in elderly patients
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
96
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Elderly patients (≥ 60 years old);
- ASA Grade I to III.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe obesity (BMI>35kg/m2);
- Spinal deformity or surgical history;
- Allergic to local anesthetics;
- There are coagulation disorders;
- Communication barriers
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Ultrasound-assisted localization, US-AS
|
In the US-AS group, ultrasonic prescan to determine the best intervertebral space, best puncture Angle and best puncture depth.
The optimal puncture section considered by the operator was selected to record the best gap, puncture Angle and depth.
In the US-RTG group, the optimal puncture section considered by the operator was selected and recorded directly in the plane of the paracentral transverse section, out of the plane of the paracentral sagittal section or in the plane of the paracentral sagittal section for real-time ultrasound guided lumbar epidural anesthesia.
|
Experimental: Real-time ultrasound guidance, US-RTG
|
In the US-AS group, ultrasonic prescan to determine the best intervertebral space, best puncture Angle and best puncture depth.
The optimal puncture section considered by the operator was selected to record the best gap, puncture Angle and depth.
In the US-RTG group, the optimal puncture section considered by the operator was selected and recorded directly in the plane of the paracentral transverse section, out of the plane of the paracentral sagittal section or in the plane of the paracentral sagittal section for real-time ultrasound guided lumbar epidural anesthesia.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
First puncture success rate
Time Frame: 1 year
|
The proportion of the first successful puncture to the total successful puncture
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Procedure time
Time Frame: 1 year
|
The time from the contact of the ultrasonic probe to the end of the operation (In seconds).
|
1 year
|
Positioning time
Time Frame: 1 year
|
The time required for pre-scanning and positioning (In seconds).
|
1 year
|
Depth and width of posterior dural complex
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Obtained by ultrasonic measurement (In centimetres).
|
1 year
|
Skin puncture times
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Count the number of skin piercings (In seconds).
|
1 year
|
Number of redirects
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Count the number of needle redirection
|
1 year
|
Patient satisfaction score (How satisfied the patient is with the whole procedure)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 is very dissatisfied; 2 is not satisfied; 3 is generally satisfied; 4 are relatively satisfied; A score of 5 is very satisfactory
|
1 year
|
Operator satisfaction score (How satisfied the patient is with the whole procedure)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 is very dissatisfied; 2 is not satisfied; 3 is generally satisfied; 4 are relatively satisfied; A score of 5 is very satisfactory
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
February 20, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 20, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 20, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 4, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 2, 2024
First Posted (Estimated)
February 5, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
February 5, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 2, 2024
Last Verified
February 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 102114
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ultrasound Therapy; Complications
-
Assiut UniversityRecruitingUltrasound Therapy; ComplicationsEgypt
-
National Cancer Institute, EgyptCompletedUltrasound Therapy; ComplicationsEgypt
-
Ataturk UniversityCompletedUltrasound Therapy; ComplicationsTurkey
-
Rongqin ZhengNot yet recruiting
-
National Taiwan University HospitalCompletedUltrasound Therapy; ComplicationsTaiwan
-
Omer KaracaBaskent UniversityCompletedUltrasound Therapy; ComplicationsTurkey
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingUltrasound Therapy; Complications
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingUltrasound Therapy; Complications
-
Carilion ClinicRecruitingUltrasound Therapy; ComplicationsUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNot yet recruitingUltrasound Therapy; Complications
Clinical Trials on Ultrasound-assisted localization, US-AS
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterAstraZenecaCompletedBreast Neoplasm | LesionUnited States
-
Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaRecruiting
-
Washington University School of MedicineNational Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)CompletedBreast Cancer | Breast Tumors | Cancer of Breast | Malignant Neoplasm of Breast | Cancer of the BreastUnited States
-
Shanghai Chest HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Washington University School of MedicineNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Completed
-
University of TennesseeLe Bonheur Children's HospitalCompletedGastrostomy Complications | Gastrostomy Tube Site ComplicationUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Withdrawn
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI); National Institute for Biomedical Imaging...RecruitingBreast CarcinomaUnited States
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNot yet recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Patellar TendinopathyUnited States
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteCompleted