Evaluation of the Impact of Vitrification on Oocytes

Evaluation of the Impact of Vitrification on the Reproductive Performance and Potential of Human Oocytes

The purpose of this study is to determine the rate of cryosurvival of mature oocytes following vitrification, and to then compare the reproductive potential of vitrified oocytes relative to those which have not been cryopreserved.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study will recruit patients from the NY/NJ/CT/eastern PA area only.

Cryopreservation of human oocytes has a great potential to preserve or extend fertility in the face of disease whose treatment would result in a loss of ovarian function. (malignancy, severe autoimmune disease, etc.). It would also provide a means of quarantining oocytes to be used in oocyte donation to provide the lowest possible risk of infection.

There are two methods for storage of oocytes: slow freezing or vitrification. Slow freezing is the conventional method and has been successfully used for embryos since 1983 and more recently for oocytes. Recent reports indicate that vitrification may be more successful than slow freezing. However, the technique has not been rigorously validated to date. The aim of this study is to determine the rate of cryosurvival of mature oocytes following vitrification, and to then compare the reproductive potential of vitrified oocytes relative to those which have not been cryopreserved.

Patients will undergo ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) according to the protocol recommended by their primary doctor. After retrieval, mature oocytes will be divided in half. One half will undergo vitrification, immediate thaw and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The other half will undergo just ICSI. All embryos will then develop on identical culture until day 3 or day 5. Prior to transfer, the best embryo from each group will undergo biopsy for genetic fingerprinting. The patient will have a 2 embryo transfer (one from each group). All extra embryos will be biopsied for pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) prior to being cryopreserved. If the patient becomes pregnant, we will follow up with an additional blood draw at approximately 9 weeks gestation and buccal swabs after the delivery of the infant(s).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • Morristown, New Jersey, United States, 07960
        • Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey
    • Pennsylvania
      • Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States, 18104
        • Reproductive Medicine Assoicates of PA at Lehigh Valley

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

This study will recruit patients from the NY/NJ/CT/eastern PA area only.

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. No prior failed IVF treatment cycle
  2. Female partner less than 35 years of age at time of onset of the IVF cycle
  3. Normal maximum prior day 3 follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level (< or = 10 IU/L)
  4. Total basal antral follicle count greater than or equal to 12
  5. Male partner with greater than 100,000 total motile spermatozoa Donor sperm is acceptable but the couples will be required to provide one additional vial for DNA analysis
  6. Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 32 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of chronic oligoovulation or anovulation (cycle typically occurring less often than every 38 days)
  2. Diagnosis of endometrial insufficiency
  3. Clinical indication for PGD (undergoing IVF with PGD to rule out a known genetic defect)
  4. Use of testicular aspiration or biopsy procedures to obtain sperm
  5. Unevaluated ovarian mass
  6. Presence of hydrosalpinges which communicate with the endometrial cavity
  7. Any contraindication to undergoing in vitro fertilization or gonadotropin stimulation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Oocyte Vitrification
Each patient will have oocytes randomized into two groups immediately after retrieval. Half of oocytes will be vitrified, thawed and inseminated. The other half will be inseminated only. All embryos will be biopsied for PGD prior to transfer and one embryo from each group will be transferred (vitrification and control groups). Following delivery, buccal swabs will be collected on all infants.
Half of the oocytes retrieved from each patient will undergo vitrification, immediate thaw and insemination. All embryos will undergo biopsy for PGD prior to transfer.
Other Names:
  • PGD
  • Vitrification

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Aneuploidy Rate (evaluation of whether embryo is chromosomally normal)
Time Frame: 1 year
Compare the rate of chromosomally-abnormal embryos among embryos originating from vitrified oocytes versus embryos originating from fresh/control oocytes.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delivery rates
Time Frame: 1 year
All embryos will be biopsied prior to transfer and DNA samples will be collected from all infants. Compare embryonic and infant DNA to evaluate whether the live birth resulted from a vitrified or a fresh/control oocyte.
1 year
Paired Sustained Implantation Rate (number of viable fetuses beyond the first trimester per embryo transferred)
Time Frame: 1 year
Among patients with a paired two blastocyst transfer, compare the implantation rate of embryos originating from vitrified oocytes versus embryos originating from fresh/control oocytes.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard T Scott, MD, Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

October 18, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 23, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RMA-2010-02

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fertilization

Clinical Trials on Vitrification and PGD

3
Subscribe