Safety of SonoVue on Pulmonary Hemodynamics

October 25, 2016 updated by: Bracco Diagnostics, Inc

A Phase II, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover, Safety Study of the Effect of Intravenous Bolus Injections of SonoVue on Pulmonary Hemodynamics in Subjects With and Without Pulmonary Hypertension

This is an intra-subject crossover comparative safety study to evaluate the effect of intravenous (IV) bolus injection of SonoVue on pulmonary hemodynamics.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Subjects will be divided into two groups based on their baseline mean pulmonary arterial pressure. Each subject will receive two injections in randomized order during right heart catheterization: one administration of SonoVue and one administration of placebo, either SonoVue followed by Placebo or Placebo followed by SonoVue. The purpose is to provide direct evidence on the presence or absence of pulmonary hemodynamic effect following IV administration of SonoVue versus any effects following IV administration of the same volume of placebo.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • Teaneck, New Jersey, United States, 07666
        • Holy Name Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provides written informed consent male or female at least 18 years of age scheduled to undergo right heart catheterization for clinical reasons

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • Significant arrhythmia or non-sinus rhythm that may affect the ability to assess pulmonary hemodynamics by catheterization
  • Known allergy to one of the ingredients in the investigational product or to any other contrast agents including ultrasound contrast agents
  • Previously entered into the study or received an investigational compound within 30 days before admission into the study
  • Unstable pulmonary and/or systemic hemodynamic condition that would affect the ability to evaluate the pharmacological or hemodynamic effect of the investigational products

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: SonoVue
Ultrasound contrast agent under development
dose of 4.8 mL administered intravenously one time
Other Names:
  • sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres
  • sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
normal saline 0.9% for injection used as the comparator
Placebo is normal saline 0.9% for injection used as the comparator administered at 4.8 mL (same dose as SonoVue)
Other Names:
  • Normal Saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effects of SonoVue and Placebo on Pulmonary Hemodynamics: Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure (mmHg) - Mean Change From Baseline
Time Frame: Comparison to baseline to 4 post dose timepoints (1, 4, 7 and 10 minutes post dose)
A total of 36 subjects were enrolled in this crossover study: 18 (8 randomized to placebo then SonoVue and 10 randomized to SonoVue then placebo) in the Hypertension Group (baseline mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) >=25.0 mmHg group) and 18 (10 randomized to placebo then SonoVue and 8 randomized to SonoVue then placebo) in the Normal group (baseline mean PAP <25.0 mmHg group). All subjects in this study were to have systolic PAP recorded within 5 minutes before the first investigational product administration. This parameter was to be measured and recorded again at 1, 4, 7 and 10 minutes after the administration of each investigational product (SonoVue and Placebo). This outcome measure presents the mean change from baseline in systolic PAP measured in mmHg. Baseline is the average of the 2 measurements within 5 minutes prior to first investigational product administration, therefore, applying to both products.
Comparison to baseline to 4 post dose timepoints (1, 4, 7 and 10 minutes post dose)
Effects of SonoVue and Placebo on Pulmonary Hemodynamics: Diastolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure (mmHg) - Mean Change From Baseline
Time Frame: Comparison to baseline to 4 post dose timepoints (1, 4, 7 and 10 minutes post dose)
All subjects in this study were to have diastolic PAP recorded within 5 minutes before the first investigational product administration. This parameter was to be measured and recorded again at 1, 4, 7 and 10 minutes after the administration of each investigational product (SonoVue and Placebo). This outcome measure presents the mean change from baseline in diastolic PAP measured in mmHg. Baseline is the average of the 2 measurements within 5 minutes prior to first investigational product administration, therefore, applying to both products.
Comparison to baseline to 4 post dose timepoints (1, 4, 7 and 10 minutes post dose)
Effects of SonoVue and Placebo on Pulmonary Hemodynamics: Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (Dyne*Sec/cm^5) - Mean Change From Baseline
Time Frame: Comparison to baseline to 2 post dose timepoints (1 and 10 minutes post dose)
All subjects in this study were to have pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR; measured in dyne x seconds per centimeters to the 5th power) derived from mean PAP (measured in mmHg), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP [mmHg]) and cardiac output (Qp [litres per minute]), each taken 5 minutes prior to the first investigational product administration, calculated using the following formula: [(mean PAP-PCWP) divided by Qp] x 80. Baseline is the last measurement prior to first investigational product administration, therefore, applying to both products. Mean PAP, PCWP and Qp were repeated at 1 and 10 minutes post dose; PVR was calculated.
Comparison to baseline to 2 post dose timepoints (1 and 10 minutes post dose)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 1, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 7, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Study of Lumason pulmonary hemodynamics

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe