Hypothermia and Circulatory Arrest During Surgery on the Ascending Aorta: A Comparison Between Two Cooling Methods

PURPOSE: To compare crash cooling versus gradient cooling methods for patients undergoing planned surgery on the ascending aorta in deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. To investigate the impact of hypothermia and circulatory arrest on the coagulation, stress-response, and cerebral outcome.

BACKGROUND: Cooling to 18 °C using extracorporeal circulation allows for circulatory arrest during surgery on the ascending aorta. Two different methods are used either lowering the temperature of the blood by 10 °C at a time, gradient cooling, or as cold as possible, crash cooling. The distribution of hypothermia is expected to be different for the two methods, the latter predominantly cooling the body core. The influence on the physiological response is expected to vary with the two methods. The surgical procedure and the cooling greatly elicit a stress response and the coagulation is profoundly influenced. There can be adverse effects on the neurological outcome due to the procedure. The two methods are considered equal, but have never been subjected to comparison. The surgery and circulatory changes can have a negative influence on the cerebral outcome .

METHODS: Twenty patients between 18 and 80 yrs randomized either to crash cooling or gradient cooling, ten patients in each group.. Patients with severe comorbidities or known coagulopathy are excluded. Anesthesia and operation as performed routinely in the department. The primary endpoint is duration of cooling, secondary endpoints include coagulation parameters (thromboelastography, clot stability), stress response parameters (adhesion molecule expression on endothelial cells, oxidative stress analysis, inflammatory markers), neuropsychological tests, MRI of the cerebrum, markers of cerebral ischemia, and ultrasound imaging of the great vessels for detection of air bubbles. Baseline values are obtained for all parameters.

Study Overview

• Status: Unknown
• Conditions: Ascending Aorta Aneurism

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 20

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Hans Kirkegaard, MD, Ph.D.; Phone Number: +4589498852; Email: hans.kirkegaard@dadlnet.dk
• Study Contact Backup: Name: Kristian K Andersen, MD; Phone Number: +4521680494; Email: kristian.kjaer.andersen@ki.au.dk

Study Locations

• Denmark
  • Aarhus N
    • Aarhus, Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
      • Recruiting
      • Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby
      • Contact: Kristian K Andersen, MD; Email: kristianka@gmail.com
      • Principal Investigator: Hans Kirkegaard, MD, Ph.D.

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Tertiary care clinic. Patients eligible for planned ascending aorta aneurism repair under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients scheduled for surgery on the ascending aorta
• Need for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest during the procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

• Known coagulopathy
• Ejection fraction less than 30 %
• Severe psychiatric or neurological disease
• Severe liver disease
• Severely reduced lung function
• Glomerular filtration rate less than 15 ml/min/1.73 m2

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Number of groups / cohorts

2

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Gradient cooling group; Study group receiving gradient cooling during the procedure using extracorporeal circulation (ECC). The procedure is used routinely in the department and is not an experimental procedure. A maximum of 10 degrees celsius is allowed between the measured nasopharyngeal body temperature and the heater-cooler unit of the ECC-machine, when cooling or rewarming.
Crash cooling group; Study group receiving rapid cooling using extracorporeal circulation. The protocol for rapid cooling is using routinely in the department and is not an experimental procedure. When cooling, the investigators aim for maximal difference in temperature between the heater-cooler unit of the ECC-machine.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
Duration of cooling	intraoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
MRI of cerebrum	Standard perfusion-weighed Magnetic Resonance imaging of the cerebrum. The same investigator describes all images. No use of contrast agents.	Baseline prior to surgery and 4 to 5 days postoperatively
Markers of neurological injury	s-100b, Neuron specific enolase	baseline, postoperative
neurological exam		baseline, postoperative, after 4 months
cognitive test		baseline, postoperative, after 4 months
markers of elevated inflammatory response		perioperatively
Markers of oxidative stress		perioperatively
Coagulation parameters		perioperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Aarhus
• Collaborators: Aarhus University Hospital

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: March 1, 2011
• Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED): September 1, 2012
• Study Completion (ANTICIPATED): December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: January 7, 2011
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 1, 2011
• First Posted (ESTIMATE): March 2, 2011

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE): March 21, 2012
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 20, 2012
• Last Verified: March 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: inflammation; coagulation; Extracorporeal circulation; Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest; aortic aneurism; neurological injury
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Cardiovascular Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Body Temperature Changes; Aortic Diseases; Aneurysm; Hypothermia; Aortic Aneurysm
• Other Study ID Numbers: HYPO-SKS-2011