Full Sternotomy vs Mini-sternotomy for Ascending Aortic Pathology

February 3, 2026 updated by: Tomsk Cardiology Research Institute

Full Sternotomy Versus J-shaped Mini-sternotomy for Chronic Ascending Aortic Pathology

This study investigates outcomes after hemiarch repair in patients with chronic ascending aortic disease. The patients will be divided into two groups according to surgical approach: 100 patients will undergo hemiarch repair via full sternotomy (FS group) and 100 patients will receive hemiarch repair via J-shaped mini-sternotomy (MS group). Early and late outcomes will be recorded.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  1. Relevance of the study Hemiarch repair is an effective treatment for patients with ascending aortic aneurysm (AAR). All aortic procedures are routinely performed from full mean sternotomy but nowadays this standard could be performed via minimally invasive approach as well. There are some data that mini-J sternotomy is associated with less blood loss and blood products transfusion, improved lung function and eliminates wound complications risks. The aim of this study was to assess the morbidity and mortality after hemiarch repair via full or J-shaped mini-sternotomy.
  2. Patients and methods Patients who will undergo hemiarch repair procedure via full sternotomy (FS group) will be compared with patients who will receive hemiarch repair via J-shaped mini-sternotomy (MS group). Baseline characteristics including preoperative clinical status, details on surgery, and postoperative outcomes will be compared between these groups. Follow-up data will be recorded.

Imaging All aortic measurements will be assessed by electrocardiography-gated computed tomographic angiography. Postoperative computed tomography of the aorta will be performed within 2 weeks after surgery. Analysis will be performed using 64-slice scanner Discovery NM-CT 570c (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with spatial resolution of the angiographic phase ranging from 0.6 to 1.25 mm. All measurements will be taken always in the plane perpendicular to the manually corrected local aortic centre line. Ascending aortic diameter will be measured at the level of the pulmonary artery bifurcation. The maximum aortic diameter (mm) will be measured from the outer contours of the aortic wall. All images will be independently assessed by two experienced cardiologists.

Surgical technique The hemiarch repair is performed via a full sternotomy or J-shaped mini-sternotomy under mild-to-moderate hypothermia (28-30°C) and antegrade cerebral perfusion through the innominate artery with side graft. The distal aortic anastomosis is performed using an open anastomosis fashion and involved resection of the inferior portion of the aortic arch from the base of the innominate artery to the projection of the origin of the left subclavian artery. Near infrared spectroscopy (Invos 5100, Somanetics Corp., USA) is used for cerebral monitoring during the operation. When the target temperature is achieved, lower body circulatory arrest with antegrade cerebral perfusion is initiated. The distal aortic anastomosis is performed with a running 4/0 polypropylene suture with a Dacron graft. Proximal aortic reconstruction including Bentall procedure, David procedure, proximal aortic anastomosis, etc. are performed during the rewarming period. The patient is weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass when the body temperature reached 36°C. The sequence of the surgical steps during the operation are the same for all patients.

Follow-up Follow-up will be performed according to the institutional database supplemented by individual patient records. Data will be obtained via medical records of clinical encounters or phone calls with patients and/or relatives. Postoperative computed tomographic scans will be performed upon discharge, at 12 months from the last procedure and at 60 months thereafter.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Tomsk, Russia, 634012
        • Recruiting
        • Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent.
  • Ascending aorta greater than 5 cm without involving the aortic arch

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute aortic dissection or urgent/emergent cases.
  • Redo aortic surgery.
  • Aortic arch surgery.
  • Concomitant CABG or left ventricle restoration

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Full Sternotomy
100 patients who will undergo hemiarch repair via full sternotomy
hemiarch repair via full sternotomy
Active Comparator: Mini J-Sternotomy
100 patients who will undergo hemiarch repair via J-shaped mini-sternotomy
hemiarch repair via J-shaped mini-sternotomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early mortality
Time Frame: during follow-up time - 60 months
The difference in the incidence of early mortality between groups (p-value).
during follow-up time - 60 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delirium (percent)
Time Frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural
The difference in the incidence of delirium during follow-up (p-value).
Perioperative/Periprocedural
Transient ischemic attack (percent)
Time Frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural
The difference in the incidence of transient ischemic attack during follow-up (p-value).
Perioperative/Periprocedural
Stroke (percent)
Time Frame: during follow-up time - 60 months
The difference in the incidence of stroke during follow-up (p-value).
during follow-up time - 60 months
Respiratory failure (percent)
Time Frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural
The difference in the incidence of respiratory failure during follow-up (p-value).
Perioperative/Periprocedural
New arrythmia (percent)
Time Frame: during follow-up time - 60 months
The difference in the incidence of new arrythmia during follow-up (p-value).
during follow-up time - 60 months
Pericardial effusion (percent)
Time Frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural
The difference in the incidence of new arrythmia during follow-up (p-value).
Perioperative/Periprocedural
Heart failure (percent)
Time Frame: during follow-up time - 60 months
The difference in the incidence of heart failure during follow-up (p-value).
during follow-up time - 60 months
Myocardial infarction (percent)
Time Frame: during follow-up time - 60 months
The difference in the incidence of myocardial infarction during follow-up (p-value).
during follow-up time - 60 months
Systemic embolism (percent)
Time Frame: during follow-up time - 60 months
The difference in the incidence of systemic embolism during follow-up (p-value).
during follow-up time - 60 months
Acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (percent)
Time Frame: during follow-up time - 60 months
The difference in the incidence of renal replacement therapy during follow-up (p-value).
during follow-up time - 60 months
Re-exploration rate (percent)
Time Frame: during follow-up time - 60 months
The difference in the incidence of re-operation for bleeding during follow-up (p-value).
during follow-up time - 60 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Boris N. Kozlov, MD, PhD, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 10, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ascending Aortic Aneurysm

Clinical Trials on Full sternotomy

Subscribe