Therapy of the Overactive Bladder Syndrome (TOBS)

May 19, 2016 updated by: Prof. Dr. Volker Viereck, Cantonal Hospital, Frauenfeld

Comparison of Solifenacin Combined With Pelvic Floor Muscle and Whole Body Vibration Training With Solifenacin Alone in Patients With Overactive Bladder Syndrome. - A Prospective Randomized Parallel Group Trial

The aim of the present study is to investigate in patients with overactive bladder syndrome (OABS) whether a combination treatment of solifenacin with pelvic floor muscle training and whole body vibration training achieves a better treatment outcome than a treatment with solifenacin alone.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The treatment of patients with OAB in clinical practice often consists of drug therapy in combination with bladder training and/or behavioural therapies such as whole body vibration training (WBVT) and pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT). However, very little data exist on the benefits of such combinations. In particular, there are not data on the association of antimuscarinic agents with both WBVT and PFMT. In order to optimize the treatment of OAB it is of great importance to conduct studies which compare pharmacotherapy alone with a combination of pharmacotherapy and behavioural techniques.

The aim of the present study is to investigate in patients with OABS whether a combination treatment of solifenacin with pelvic floor muscle training and whole body vibration training achieves a better treatment outcome than a treatment with solifenacin alone.

At the baseline visit subjects will be randomised into 2 treatment arms. Patients randomized to group A will receive solifenacin 5mg tablet once daily and a training programme for PFMT and WBVT once a week. Subjects randomised to group B will receive solifenacin 5mg tablet once daily. Efficacy evaluation will take place at week 8 and 16. Safety evaluations will take place at each visit. At week 8, after discussion with the investigator, the patient will have an option to continue with the original dose or request a dose increase based on their satisfaction of efficacy and tolerability.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Thurgau
      • Frauenfeld, Thurgau, Switzerland, 8501
        • Blasenzentrum, Cantonal Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female patients with symptoms of overactive bladder (urinary frequency and urgency with or without incontinence) for ≥ 3 months
  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Urinary frequency ≥ 8 micturitions on average per 24 hours during the 3-day micturition diary period
  • At least 3 episodes of urgency with or without incontinence (≥ 3) during the 3-day micturition diary period
  • Patient provides written informed consent
  • Patient is willing to complete the micturition diary

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically significant bladder outflow obstruction at risk of urinary retention (at the discretion of the investigator)
  • Significant post void residual volume (> 200ml)
  • Uncontrolled narrow angle glaucoma, urinary or gastric retention, severe ulcerative colitis, toxic megacolon, myasthenia gravis or any other medical condition which in the opinion of the investigator makes the use of anticholinergics contraindicated
  • Neurological cause of abnormal detrusor activity
  • Any clinically significant condition, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for the study
  • Current non-drug treatment including pelvic floor muscle and whole body vibration training
  • Known contraindications for whole body vibration training (cardiovascular, neurological or orthopaedic diseases, diabetes, tumor, pacemaker)
  • Pregnant women or women who intend to become pregnant during the study
  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to solifenacin or lactose
  • Concomitant use of a strong cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor (e.g. ketoconazole)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: solifenacin 5mg, PFMT and WBVT
Patients randomized to group A will receive solifenacin 5mg tablet once daily and a training programme for PFMT and WBVT once a week.
solifenacin 5mg tablet once daily
Other Names:
  • brand name: vesicare
pelvic floor muscle and whole body vibration training once a week
Other Names:
  • Galileo
  • Pelvic Floor Muscle Training
  • Whole Body Vibration Training
Active Comparator: solifenacin 5mg
Subjects randomised to group B will receive solifenacin 5mg tablet once daily.
solifenacin 5mg tablet once daily
Other Names:
  • brand name: vesicare

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC)
Time Frame: baseline and 16 weeks

The primary efficacy parameter is the change from baseline in mean score of patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC). Between-treatment differences in changes from baseline to endpoint will formally be tested using an analysis of variance (ANOVA).

For the primary efficacy parameter, statistically significant superiority of solifenacin combined with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and whole body vibration training (WBVT) to solifenacin alone must be obtained.

baseline and 16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in micturitions/24h based on a 3-day micturition diary
Time Frame: baseline and 16 weeks

The analysis as described for the primary endpoint will be also applied for the secondary variables:

Change from baseline in mean score of number of micturitions/24h based on a 3-day micturition diary.

baseline and 16 weeks
Change of urgency episodes (grade ≥3) /24h
Time Frame: baseline and 16 weeks

The analysis as described for the primary endpoint will be also applied for the secondary variables:

Change from baseline in mean number of urgency episodes (grade ≥3) /24h.

baseline and 16 weeks
Change in volume voided per micturition
Time Frame: baseline and 16 weeks

The analysis as described for the primary endpoint will be also applied for the secondary variables:

Change from baseline in mean volume voided per micturition.

baseline and 16 weeks
Change in number of incontinence and urge incontinence episodes/24h
Time Frame: baseline and 16 weeks

The analysis as described for the primary endpoint will be also applied for the secondary variables:

Change from baseline in mean number of incontinence and urge incontinence episodes/24h.

baseline and 16 weeks
Change in number of pads used/24h
Time Frame: baseline and 16 weeks

The analysis as described for the primary endpoint will be also applied for the secondary variables:

Change from baseline in mean number of pads used/24h.

baseline and 16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Volker VV Viereck, physican, Cantonal Hospital, Frauenfeld

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

March 15, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 20, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overactive Bladder

Clinical Trials on solifenacin

3
Subscribe