The Effects of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine on Spinal Anesthesia Using Diluted Low-Dose Bupivacaine for Transurethral Resection of Prostate in Elderly

March 4, 2013 updated by: Yonsei University

Spinal block is the most common anesthetic technique for transurethral resection of prostatectomy (TURP). Most patients undergoing TURP are elderly and frequently present with cardiopulmonary and endocrine diseases. Low-dose local anesthetic is commonly administer to limit the block level to minimize the hemodynamic changes. However, sometimes it may not provide an adequate level of sensory block. Thus, intrathecal additive is frequently administer with local anesthetic to improve analgesic effect.

Dexmedetomidine(DXM), a selective 2-adrenoreceptor agonist, has been used in the epidural space in humans without any reports of neurological deficits. Previous clinical studies showed that intravenous dexmedetomidine administration prolonged the sensory and motor blocks of bupivacaine spinal analgesia. But clinical studies about the use of intrathecal DXM with local anesthesia in humans are scarce in the literature. Kanazi et al. found that 3μg DXM added to 12 mg spinal bupivacaine produced the significant short onset of sensory and motor block as well as significantly longer duration of sensory and motor block than bupivacaine. And Al-Mustafa et al. reported that intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 12.5mg bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia has a dose dependant effect on the onset and regression of sensory and motor block.

In our previous study, low-dose diluted bupivacaine 5 mg provided sufficient anesthetic level when opioid was added with local anesthetic. However, opioid-induced side effects, such as pruritus, nausea, or vomiting, could be an obstacle in common use. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether DXM-low-dose bupivacaine spinal anesthesia can provide the effective spinal anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with minimal side effect compare to the local anesthetic only group.

This study was conducted in a randomized, double-blind, controlled fashion. Patients were randomly allocated to DXM group or Saline group. DMT group received hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (1.2 ml) (6 mg) in dextrose 8% solution + DMT 0.3 ml (3 µg)-in total, bupivacaine 0.4% (1.5 ml) intrathecally and Saline group received hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (1.2 ml) (6 mg) in dextrose 8% solution + normal saline 0.3 ml -in total, bupivacaine 0.4% (1.5 ml) intrathecally. After spinal block, the level of sensory block, defined as the dermatomal segment with loss of pain sensation to pin-prick with a 22 G hypodermic needle and cold sensation to alcohol swab was measured every 2 min after intrathecal injection. The investigators recorded the peak sensory block level, time to peak block level from intrathecal injection, blood pressure and heart rate, and analgesic supplementation during operation. The maximum motor block level was assessed according to the modified Bromage scale. During postoperative period, the frequency of analgesic requirement, time to the first analgesic request, and pain scores were evaluated by blind investigator.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

63 years to 83 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I-III
  • the patient who undergoing elective TURP for benign prostatic hypertrophy under spinal anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Past history of spine surgery
  • infection focus at back
  • coagulopathy
  • hypersensitivity to local anaesthetics or DMT
  • mental disturbance
  • neurological disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DXM-bupivacaine
0.4% bupivacaine(normal saline 0.3ml with dexmedetomidine 3 mcg)
0.4% bupivacaine(normal saline 0.3 ml with 0.5% bupivacaine 1.2 ml)
Placebo Comparator: saline-bupivacaine
0.4% bupivacaine(normal saline 0.3ml with dexmedetomidine 3 mcg)
0.4% bupivacaine(normal saline 0.3 ml with 0.5% bupivacaine 1.2 ml)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of efficacy of DXM-bupivacaine
Time Frame: The sensory block level at every 2 minutes (up until 14 minutes) after drug injection during spinal anesthesia
The primary objective is to evaluate the effects of DXM-bupivacaine in spinal block level compare to the saline-bupivacaine (peak sensory block level, time to peak sensory block level reached).
The sensory block level at every 2 minutes (up until 14 minutes) after drug injection during spinal anesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the degree of the postoperative analgesic effect
Time Frame: change in VAS(Visual Analog Scale) at 6 hours and 24 hours after surgery
Secondary objective is the comparison of the degree of the postoperative analgesic effect between the DXM group and the Saline group (visual analog scale at postoperative 6 hours and 24 hours, time to first analgesic request).
change in VAS(Visual Analog Scale) at 6 hours and 24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 27, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 6, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2013

Last Verified

March 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy

Clinical Trials on spinal anesthesia

3
Subscribe