Laser CO2 Versus TENS After Reconstruction of the Rotator Cuff

January 16, 2018 updated by: Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Light Amplification by Simulated Emission Radiation Carbon Dioxide (Laser CO2) Versus Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation (TENS) for the Reduction of Pain in Patients After Reconstruction of the Rotator Cuff. A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the most effective method between Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation and Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation therapy carbon dioxide therapy for pain control in the post-surgical rehabilitation of patients treated with reconstruction of the rotator cuff.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

To evaluate the most effective method between Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation and Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation therapy carbon dioxide for pain control in the post-surgical rehabilitation of patients treated with reconstruction of the rotator cuff and to evaluate, at the end of the rehabilitation period, the range of motion, the function gained and the quality of life comparatively in the two groups of patients treated with Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation or Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation therapy carbon dioxide therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bo
      • Bologna, Bo, Italy, 40136
        • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • subjects after surgery for rotator cuff injury of traumatic and / or degenerative

Exclusion Criteria:

  • concomitant fractures of the humerus, pace-maker, diseases for which treatments are contraindicated.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Laser CO2
The therapy is performed with the patient sitting, place the unit high above the shoulder with the following indicators: through a pulsed 40 Hz, distance between device and patient 60 cm, 10x15 cm area of application, power 2W; energy between 10 and 15 J/cm2
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: TENS

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Application of Stimulation occurs through the use of No. 3 channels (long head of biceps area (CLB), the supraspinatus muscle area, the area medial border of the scapula.

Duration: Twenty (20) minutes, mpulsi: 70 microsec, frequency: 100 Hz, intensity: between 20 and 40 mA.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale Mean Score
Time Frame: Change from baseline in pain at the end of the rehabilitation cycle (two weeks)
To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation carbon dioxide therapy vs Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator during the first cycle of rehabilitation through Visual Analogue Scale, calculating the mean score in values of beginning and end of daily treatment. The scale had values from 0 to 10 where zero represented no pain and 10 the worst possible pain. More than 3 means pain.
Change from baseline in pain at the end of the rehabilitation cycle (two weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Constant Murley Score for Range of Motion and Shoulder Function Assessment.
Time Frame: Change from baseline in range of motion at the end of the rehabilitation cycle (two weeks)
The Constant Murley scale had values from 0 to 100 where zero represented the worst possible range of motion and shoulder function and 100 the best.
Change from baseline in range of motion at the end of the rehabilitation cycle (two weeks)
Short Form 12-PCS for Quality of Life Assessment
Time Frame: Change from baseline in quality of life at the end of the rehabilitation cycle (two weeks)
The SF-12 is weighted and summed to provide easily interpretable scales for physical and mental health. SF-12 score measures substantially limited physical disability, general well-being and the perception of one's state of health, (Physical Component Summary) and also measure the psychological attitude of the patient, the limitation in social and personal activities (Mental Component Summary). Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Change from baseline in quality of life at the end of the rehabilitation cycle (two weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roberta Monesi, PT, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 11, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0013483

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Injury

Clinical Trials on LASER CO2

Subscribe