- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01403168
Comparative Evaluation of Osteopathy Treatment Efficacy in Pain Support After Breast Surgery in Oncology (OSTEOPATHIE)
This is an open, prospective, controlled, randomized, comparative study with 2 arms.
The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy of osteopathy after breast surgery.
80 patients will be enrolled, 40 per arm. Patients will be randomized at inclusion and will be followed during one year.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
LYON Cedex 08, France, 69373
- Centre Leon Berard
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- woman >= 18 years
- pain (median VAS >=3 on the week prior to inclusion)
- mastectomy or tumorectomy with axillary dissection <= 12 months
- PS <=2
- able to write, understand and read French
- signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- no pain
- immediate breast reconstruction
- history of cognitive or psychiatric troubles
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: osteopathy + conventional analgesic treatments
|
5 sessions for osteopathy are planned and will start in the 15 days following the enrollment. The conventional analgesic treatments will be administered in the 15 days following the enrollment. |
|
Placebo Comparator: conventional analgesic treatments
|
These treatments will be administered in the 15 days following the enrollment.
Dose and frequence will depend on patients.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy of the osteopathy treatment on pain
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Pain is assessed by means of visual analogic scale (from 0 to 10 points).
A decrease of 2 points after 3 months is expected.
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gisèle CHVETZOFF, MD, Centre Leon Berard
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Dirks J, Fredensborg BB, Christensen D, Fomsgaard JS, Flyger H, Dahl JB. A randomized study of the effects of single-dose gabapentin versus placebo on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after mastectomy. Anesthesiology. 2002 Sep;97(3):560-4. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200209000-00007.
- Jung BF, Ahrendt GM, Oaklander AL, Dworkin RH. Neuropathic pain following breast cancer surgery: proposed classification and research update. Pain. 2003 Jul;104(1-2):1-13. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00241-0. No abstract available.
- Attal N, Cruccu G, Haanpaa M, Hansson P, Jensen TS, Nurmikko T, Sampaio C, Sindrup S, Wiffen P; EFNS Task Force. EFNS guidelines on pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain. Eur J Neurol. 2006 Nov;13(11):1153-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01511.x.
- Hayes NM, Bezilla TA. Incidence of iatrogenesis associated with osteopathic manipulative treatment of pediatric patients. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006 Oct;106(10):605-8.
- Vick DA, McKay C, Zengerle CR. The safety of manipulative treatment: review of the literature from 1925 to 1993. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1996 Feb;96(2):113-5. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.1996.96.2.113.
- Fassoulaki A, Patris K, Sarantopoulos C, Hogan Q. The analgesic effect of gabapentin and mexiletine after breast surgery for cancer. Anesth Analg. 2002 Oct;95(4):985-91, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200210000-00036.
- Ivens D, Hoe AL, Podd TJ, Hamilton CR, Taylor I, Royle GT. Assessment of morbidity from complete axillary dissection. Br J Cancer. 1992 Jul;66(1):136-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1992.230.
- Labreze L, Dixmerias-Iskandar F, Monnin D, Bussieres E, Delahaye E, Bernard D, Lakdja F. [Postmastectomy pain syndrome evidence based guidelines and decision trees]. Bull Cancer. 2007 Mar;94(3):275-85. French.
- Eija K, Tiina T, J NP. Amitriptyline effectively relieves neuropathic pain following treatment of breast cancer. Pain. 1996 Feb;64(2):293-302. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00138-7.
- Ernst E. Manipulation of the cervical spine: a systematic review of case reports of serious adverse events, 1995-2001. Med J Aust. 2002 Apr 15;176(8):376-80. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04459.x.
- Licht PB, Christensen HW, Hoilund-Carlsen PF. Is cervical spinal manipulation dangerous? J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Jan;26(1):48-52. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2003.42.
- Vickers A, Zollman C. ABC of complementary medicine. The manipulative therapies: osteopathy and chiropractic. BMJ. 1999 Oct 30;319(7218):1176-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7218.1176. No abstract available.
- Noll DR, Degenhardt BF, Stuart M, McGovern R, Matteson M. Effectiveness of a sham protocol and adverse effects in a clinical trial of osteopathic manipulative treatment in nursing home patients. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2004 Mar;104(3):107-13. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- OSTEOPATHIE
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.