Comparison of the Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of actiTENS to Those of Level 2 Analgesic Treatments. (ArthroTENS)

April 2, 2019 updated by: Sublimed

Multicentre, Phase 3, Prospective Study With On-line Randomization, in Single Blind Conditions for the Primary Efficacy Endpoint, Controlled, in Two Parallel Groups, Comparing the Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of actiTENS Versus Level 2 Systemic Analgesics Recommended for the Treatment of Chronic Nociceptive Pain of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Patients Suffering From Osteoarthritis of the Knee

This is a phase 3, multicentre, prospective, single-blind on principal efficacy criterion, 2 parallel groups, randomized, controlled clinical study comparing efficacy and safety of actiTENS versus systemic level 2 analgesics recommended for the treatment of moderate or severe, nociceptive, chronic pain in patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the knee.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating chronic condition requiring long-term treatment of pain and inducing functional impairment. More specifically knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common disease associated with significant morbidity. Its prevalence increases with age dramatically. KOA is frequently associated with pain which can worsen with daily activities. The goals of KOA treatments are to provide pain relief and to improve function and quality of life. For the American college of Rheumatology and despite the frequent use of TENS in treating patients with KOA, questions remained regarding its efficacy. Consequently TENS needs additional clinical studies to demonstrate its efficacy in management of painful osteoarthritis.

The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy and to the safety of TENS in the management of chronic, nociceptive pain in patient suffering from KOA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lille, France
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Roger Salengro
        • Contact:
          • Bernard Cortet, PhD, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult > or = 55 years.
  • Being monitored by a rheumatologist in private practice or in a hospital.
  • Presenting nociceptive pain:

    • chronic (for at least 3 months),
    • secondary to knee osteoarthritis confirmed by x-ray: stage 2 and over according to Kellgren and Lawrence.
  • Of moderate to severe intensity equal to or above 4 on a numerical scale of 0-10.
  • In a situation of analgesic therapy failure for level 1 analgesics:

    • paracetamol and NSAIDS,
    • Prescribed at therapeutic dose : 4 g/d of paracetamol and 1200 mg/d of ibuprofen or equivalent (analgesic dose),
    • For at least 2 weeks,
  • Requiring a level 2 prescription.
  • Affiliated to social security insurance.
  • Informed of the concept and agreeing to use the TENS as a non-medicinal analgesic treatment.
  • Capable of understanding how to use the TENS and the level 2 analgesic treatments.
  • Intellectually and physically able to participate in the study in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Owns a Smartphone to be able to download the actiTENS application.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or previous allergy to the actiTENS electrodes.
  • On-going or planned pregnancy and absence of effective contraception (except for menopausal women).
  • Neuropathic pain with a DN4 result > 4/10 or with a positive response to one or more questions in the DN4 clinical examination.
  • Osteoarthritis flare.
  • Surgery planned in the following 6 months.
  • History of multiple operations on the knee concerned.
  • Medicinal or non-medicinal treatments which could influence the pathology being studied.
  • Modification of medicinal or non-medicinal treatments planned in the following 6 months.
  • Current participation in another study.
  • Presence of another painful condition which could perturb the evaluation.
  • Patient with an absolute contraindication to TENS or level 2 systemic analgesic treatments recommended for the treatment of chronic pain of moderate or severe intensity.
  • Patient unable to express his/her consent or deprived of liberty.
  • Patient with cognitive disorder or behaviour rendering him/her unsuitable to follow the instructions for this study.
  • Patient not affiliated to a social security system.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: TENS
Treatment by non-pharmacological transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS)
ActiTENS is a rechargeable box, weighing 64g attached by Velcro to an adhesive support, which can be positioned on the skin at any position chosen by the patient. The patient will use the programme (P4) prescribed by his doctor and will regulate the intensity of stimulation using an application downloaded to his smartphone which will communicate with the box via Bluetooth.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: level 2 systemic analgesic treatments
Treatment by level 2 analgesic pharmacological treatment indicated in the treatment of chronic nociceptive pain of moderate to severe intensity.

There are 4 level 2 oral analgesic treatments indicated for chronic nociceptive pain of moderate to severe intensity (between 4 and 7 on a simple numerical scale of 11 points) (12):

  • Tramadol immediate release formulation (IR, one intake every 6 hours) or prolonged release formulation (PR, one intake every 12 hours); maximum posology 400mg/24h.
  • Dihydrocodeine: 60mg every 12 hours; maximum posology 120mg/24h.
  • Combination of paracetamol and codeine in a fixed combination every 6 hours; maximum posology of codeine: 300mg/24h.
  • Combination of paracetamol and tramadol in a fixed combination; maximum posology of tramadol: 8 tablets/24h ie 300mg/24h.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy : pain intensity evaluated by a numerus scale from 0 to 10
Time Frame: 3 months after dosing
Pain intensity (PI) at M3 between both treatment groups. Numerus scale with a minimum of 0 (no pain) to a maximum of 10 (maximum pain).
3 months after dosing
Safety : occurence of adverse events
Time Frame: 3 months after dosing
Number of adverse events (AE) occurred during the 3 months of follow-up and due to studied treatments.
3 months after dosing

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy : pain intensity evaluated by a numerus scale from 0 to 10
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 6 months after dosing
Minimum, maximum,median and difference of pain intensity (PI) during movement and at rest at M1, M3 and M6 between both treatment groups
1, 3 and 6 months after dosing
Efficacy : functional status evaluated by the WOMAC score (Western Onatario McMaster score)
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 6 months after dosing
Functional status (pain, function, stiffness) at M1, M3 and M6.
1, 3 and 6 months after dosing
Efficacy : pain relief (PAR) evaluated by the pain visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 6 months after dosing
Pain relief at M1, M3 and M6. VAS from 0 to 10 with 0 = no relief and 10 = total relief). Scale of 100 mm.
1, 3 and 6 months after dosing
Efficacy : quality of life evaluated by the questionnaire EuroQol-5D
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 6 months after dosing
Evaluation of the quality of life at M1, M3 and M6
1, 3 and 6 months after dosing
Efficacy : patient global impression of change evaluated by a global impression questionnaire.
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 6 months after dosing
Evaluation of the change on activity, symptoms, emotions, quality of life regarding the pain of patient at M1, M3 and M6
1, 3 and 6 months after dosing
Efficacy : drop-outs for inefficacy
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Evaluation of the number of patient drop outs because of treatment inefficacy in each arm
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Efficacy : prolongation of studied treatment
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Evaluation of the number of patient wishes to continue the studied treatment.
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Safety : occurrence of Adverse Events (AE)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Evaluation by the type of AE and the date of occurence
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Safety : drop-outs for AE and corrective treatments
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Evaluation of the number of patient drop outs because of the occurence of adverse events in each arm
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Estimation of direct costs.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Comparison of treatment costs between the two arms
Through study completion, an average of 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bernard CORTET, Pr, Hôpital Roger Salengro - Service de Rhumatologie

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 19, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 30, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on ActiTENS

Subscribe