Proclear 1-D Multifocal Nondispensing Study

March 7, 2014 updated by: CooperVision, Inc.
This study is designed to compare the relative performance related to subjective and objective vision between two multifocal soft contact lenses.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this study was to compare the subjective and objective vision. of Proclear® 1-D Multifocal test lenses (MF) with +0.75D overcorrection of the distance lens power in the nondominant eye compared to the Air Optix® Aqua Multifocal (CIBA VISION) contact lenses in low, Medium and High Add presbyopic subjects (+1.25 to +2.50 inclusive).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

49

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Bloomington,, Indiana, United States, 47405
        • Clinical Optics Research Lab, Indiana University,

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be between 40 and 65 years of age (inclusive)
  • Require a reading addition of +1.25 to +2.50D (inclusive)
  • Spherical distance CL or spectacle prescription between +3.00D and -5.00D(inclusive)
  • Spectacle cylinder less than or equal to 0.75D in both eyes.
  • Currently has a reading add correction in their spectacle or CL habitual correction (e.g. if myope, removes distance correction to read)
  • Normal binocularity (no amblyopia, no strabismus, no habitually uncorrected anisometropia ≥ 2.00D)
  • Have a minimum 2 weeks soft contact lens experience
  • Be able to wear the study lens (e.g. good fit is attained and acceptable subjective comfort and vision for the duration of the study)
  • Able to read, comprehend and sign an informed consent
  • Willing to comply with the wear and study visit schedule
  • Monocular best-corrected distance visual acuity ≥ 20/25 in each eye
  • No gas permeable contact lens wear for 1 month prior to the study

Exclusion Criteria:

To be eligible for the study, each candidate must not present with any of the following

  • Any active corneal infection, injury, inflammation, or ocular abnormality
  • Systemic or ocular allergies, which might interfere with contact lens wear
  • Systemic disease, which might interfere with contact lens wear
  • Ocular disease, which might interfere with contact lens wear
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Strabismus/amblyopia
  • Habitually uncorrected anisometropia greater than or equal to 2.00 D
  • Subjects who have undergone corneal refractive surgery
  • Subjects with keratoconus or other severe corneal irregularity contraindicating lens wear

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: omafilcon A / PC 1-D MF

omafilcon A (PC 1-D MF) / lotrafilcon B (AIR OPTIX MF)

Subjects were randomly assigned into either the omafilcon A/PC 1-D MF lenses with +0.75D over-correction in the non-dominant eye or the lotrafilcon B/Air Optix MF lenses then crossed-over into the alternative pair of study lenses.

Subjects were randomly assigned into either the omafilcon A/PC 1-D MF lenses with +0.75D over-correction in the non-dominant eye or the lotrafilcon B/Air Optix MF lenses then crossed-over into the alternative pair of study lenses.
Other Names:
  • Proclear Multifocal daily wear soft contact lenses
Subjects were randomly assigned into either the omafilcon A/PC 1-D MF lenses with +0.75D over-correction in the non-dominant eye or the lotrafilcon B/Air Optix MF lenses then crossed-over into the alternative pair of study lenses
Other Names:
  • Air OPtix Aqua Multifocal extended wear soft contact lenses
Active Comparator: lotrafilcon B / Air Optix MF

lotrafilcon B (AIR OPTIX MF) / omafilcon A (PC 1-D MF)

Subjects were randomly assigned into either the omafilcon A/PC 1-D MF lenses with +0.75D over-correction in the non-dominant eye or the lotrafilcon B/Air Optix MF lenses then crossed-over into the alternative pair of study lenses.

Subjects were randomly assigned into either the omafilcon A/PC 1-D MF lenses with +0.75D over-correction in the non-dominant eye or the lotrafilcon B/Air Optix MF lenses then crossed-over into the alternative pair of study lenses.
Other Names:
  • Proclear Multifocal daily wear soft contact lenses
Subjects were randomly assigned into either the omafilcon A/PC 1-D MF lenses with +0.75D over-correction in the non-dominant eye or the lotrafilcon B/Air Optix MF lenses then crossed-over into the alternative pair of study lenses
Other Names:
  • Air OPtix Aqua Multifocal extended wear soft contact lenses

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Vision Assessments: High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity
Time Frame: After 1 hour of lens wear
Tested with charts distant to the subject with both eyes together in normal lighting conditions. The unit of measure is logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) A logMAR acuity of 0.0 equates to 20/20 Snellen acuity. Positive logMAR values indicate poorer vision and negative values denote better visual acuity than baseline 20/20 value.
After 1 hour of lens wear
Objective Vision Assessments: High Contrast Intermediate Visual Acuity
Time Frame: After 1 hour of lens wear
Tested with charts at intermediate distance (100cm)distant to the subject with both eyes together in normal lighting conditions. The unit of measure is logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) A logMAR acuity of 0.0 equates to 20/20 Snellen acuity. Positive logMAR values indicate poorer vision and negative values denote better visual acuity than baseline 20/20 value.
After 1 hour of lens wear
Objective Vision Assessments: High Contrast Near Visual Acuity
Time Frame: After 1 hour of lens wear
Tested with charts set at near point (40cm)distant to the subject with both eyes together in normal lighting conditions. The unit of measure is logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) A logMAR acuity of 0.0 equates to 20/20 Snellen acuity. Positive logMAR values indicate poorer vision and negative values denote better visual acuity than baseline 20/20 value.
After 1 hour of lens wear

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective Overall Vision: High Contrast Distance Visual Quality
Time Frame: After 1 hour of lens wear
Subjects instructed to rate Vision quality at distance, intermediate and near vision (OU) using a 0-100 numerical scale where 0 = poor and 100 = excellent.
After 1 hour of lens wear
Subjective Vision Assessments: High Contrast Intermediate Visual Quality
Time Frame: After 1 hour of lens wear
Subjects instructed to rate Vision quality at distance, intermediate and near vision (OU) using a 0-100 numerical scale where 0 = poor and 100 = excellent.
After 1 hour of lens wear
Subjective Vision Assessments: High Contrast Near Visual Quality
Time Frame: After 1 hour of lens wear
Subjects instructed to rate Vision quality at distance, intermediate and near vision (OU) using a 0-100 numerical scale where 0 = poor and 100 = excellent.
After 1 hour of lens wear

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter Kollbaum, OD, PhD, Clinical Optics Research Lab, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 7, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2014

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CV-12-02A

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Presbyopia

Clinical Trials on omafilcon A / PC 1-D MF

Subscribe