Utility of Abdominal Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Children With Blunt Trauma

January 15, 2019 updated by: University of California, Davis

The major goal of this project is to conduct a randomized controlled trial studying an initial evaluation strategy with abdominal ultrasound versus a strategy without abdominal ultrasound for the evaluation of children with blunt abdominal trauma. The proposal's objectives are to compare the following variables in those that randomize to abdominal ultrasound versus those that do not:

  1. rate of abdominal CT scanning
  2. time to emergency department disposition
  3. the rate of missed/delayed diagnosis of intra-abdominal injury
  4. the costs.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

925

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • UC Davis Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Blunt torso trauma resulting from a significant mechanism of injury

    • Motor vehicle collision: greater than 60 mph, ejection, or rollover
    • Automobile versus pedestrian/bicycle: automobile speed > 25 mph
    • Falls greater than 20 feet in height
    • Crush injury to the torso
    • Physical assault involving the abdomen
    • Decreased level of consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale score < 15 or below age-appropriate behavior) in association with blunt torso trauma
  • Blunt traumatic event with any of the following (regardless of the mechanism):

    • Extremity paralysis
    • Multiple long bone fractures (e.g., tibia and humerus fracture)
  • History and physical examination suggestive of intra-abdominal injury following blunt torso trauma of any mechanism (including mechanisms of injury of less severity than mentioned above)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No concern for inter-abdominal injury or no planned evaluation for possible IAI
  • Prehospital or ED age adjusted Hypotension
  • Prehospital or initial ED GCS score ≤ 8
  • Presence of an abdominal "seat belt sign" - continuous area of erythema/contusion completely across the lower abdomen secondary to a lap belt
  • Penetrating trauma: stab or gunshot wounds
  • Traumatic injury occurring > 24 hours prior to the time of presentation to the ED
  • Transfer of the patient to the UCDMC ED from an outside facility with abdominal CT scan, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, or laparotomy previously performed
  • Patients with known disease processes resulting in intraperitoneal fluid including liver failure and the presence of ventriculoperitoneal shunts

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Abdominal Ultrasound
Patients in the experimental arm will receive a "Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST)" which includes the use of abdominal ultrasound.
Use of FAST abdominal ultrasound exam
Other Names:
  • Focused Assesment with Sonography for Trauma
No Intervention: No Abdominal Ultrasound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of Abdominal CT Scan
Time Frame: One week from enrollment
One week from enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Total time spent in the Emergency Department
Time Frame: 24 hours from enrollment
24 hours from enrollment
Cost effectiveness
Time Frame: two months from enrollment
two months from enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James F Holmes, MD, MPH, UC Davis School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 28, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 244545 (Other Identifier: UC Davis)
  • H34MC19682 (Other Grant/Funding Number: US Department of Health and Human Services)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Abdominal Injuries

Clinical Trials on Abdominal Ultrasound (FAST examination)

3
Subscribe