Pelvic CT Imaging in Blunt Abdominal Trauma

April 19, 2022 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Pelvic CT Imaging in Blunt Trauma: Limiting Low Yield Radiation Exposure in Carefully Selected Adult and Pediatric Patients

Abdominopelvic CT (CTap) utilization rose significantly in blunt trauma patients over the last decade. However, the observed increases failed to reduce mortality or missed injury rates. Several investigators have derived (citation) and validated (citation) clinical decision rules that attempt to identify a subset of low risk pediatric and adult patients in whom abdominopelvic CT imaging can be safely eliminated. Thus far these efforts failed to significantly reduce utilization. The investigators propose an alternative and complimentary strategy to decrease radiation by selectively eliminating the pelvic imaging portion of the abdominopelvic CT in low risk patients. In stable, alert patients without clinically evidence of pelvis or hip fractures, abdominal CT imaging alone (diaphragm to iliac crest) identifies clinically significant intra-abdominal injury (cs-IAI) as accurately as routine abdominopelvic imaging (diaphragm to greater trochanter) and results in a clinically important decrease in radiation exposure. The study will investigate this by comparing the accuracy of an imaging protocol using CT abdomen alone versus CT abdomen and pelvis to detect cs-IAI among stable, blunt trauma patients without suspected pelvis or hip fractures in two age groups: ages 3-17 years and 18-60. Patients will undergo CT imaging as deemed clinically indicated by the treating clinician. Among those who have abdominopelvic CT scans, the study will determine the test characteristics of CT abdomen alone versus CT abdomen plus CT pelvis imaging for the identification of cs-IAI. The reference standard will include initial radiology reports, with structured follow up of indeterminate scans, operative reports, and 7-day medical record review.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Abdominopelvic computed tomography (CTap) utilization rose significantly in blunt trauma patients over the last decade but failed to reduce mortality or missed injury rates.

Primary Hypothesis: In stable, alert patients (GCS > 14) without clinically evident fractures of the pelvis, hip or lumbar spine, CT abdomen (CTa) alone (diaphragm to iliac crest) identifies intra-abdominal injury (IAI) with an accuracy that is not inferior to routine CTap (diaphragm to greater trochanter) with a clinically relevant reduction in radiation exposure.

Primary Aim: Compare the accuracy of CTa alone versus CTap to detect IAI in two age groups: ages 3-17 years and 18-60 years. Blunt trauma patients requiring CTap will be enrolled. Data obtained prior to CT imaging include demographics, injury mechanism, exam and pelvic radiograph findings and FAST results from the trauma evaluation. The original CTap will be digitally reformatted to create matched pairs of de-identified CTa and CTap studies. A board certified study radiologist, blinded to the original CT and clinical outcome, will interpret the CTa studies in injured patients. McNemar's chi-square test will be used to evaluate the null hypothesis for injuries in matched pairs assuming no difference for uninjured patients. Te the test characteristics of the CTa versus CTap will be determined. The reference standard will include initial radiology reports, operative reports, and 7-day medical record review. If the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for the difference in the performance (accuracy) of CTap and CTa alone is less than 3%, the conclusion will be that CTa alone is not inferior to CTap to diagnose IAI. Secondary Aims: The mean effective doses of radiation will be calculated and compared with reductions up to 50% expected. The study will determine if physicians' pretest probability accurately identifies clinically significant pelvis, hip and lumbar spine fractures (CTp indications) in two age groups: ages 3-17 years and 18-60 years. Using a gestalt pretest probability of ≤ 2% as "negative for injury", and a pretest probability > 2% as "positive for injury", the test characteristics of physician estimation will be determined. The test characteristics and interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa statistic) of exam findings expected to predict fractures of the pelvis, hip and lumbar spine will be reported separately.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

230

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28210
        • Carolinas Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 60 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

3-60 years of age evaluated for blunt trauma with a GCS of >14 Order of CT abdomen and pelvis imaging

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 3-60 years of age evaluated for blunt trauma with a GCS of >14
  2. Order of CT abdomen and pelvis imaging

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients requiring intubation or suspected neurological injury (defined above)
  2. Pregnant patients
  3. Intoxicated patients
  4. Patients with age defined hypotension
  5. Exploratory laparotomy or transfusion during the ED evaluation
  6. Non-verbal patients
  7. Positive FAST exam
  8. Patients with abdominal trauma or surgery in the last month
  9. Victims of sexual assault or non-accidental trauma (NAT)
  10. Patients with known or suspected fractures of the femur or pelvis prior to CT imaging
  11. Patients with hip dislocations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
CT abdomen and pelvis
blunt trauma patients without suspected fractures of the pelvis, hip or lumbar spine in two age groups: ages 3-17 years and 18-60 years

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intrabdominal Injury
Time Frame: 7 days
Accuracy of CT abdomen alone versus CT abdomen and pelvis to detect IAI among stable, blunt trauma patients without suspected fractures of the pelvis, hip or lumbar spine will be compared. The original abdominopelvic CT will be used to create matched pairs of de-identified and digitally reformatted CT abdomen and CT abdomen and pelvis studies. A board certified study radiologist, blinded to the original CT reading and clinical outcome, will interpret the digitally reformatted CT abdomen studies in all injured patients. McNemar's chi-square test will be used to evaluate the null hypothesis for the percentage of correctly identified injuries in the matched pairs assuming no difference for uninjured patients. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the CT abdomen alone versus CT abdomen and pelvis will be determined. The reference standard will include initial radiology reports, with structured follow up of indeterminate scans, operative reports, and 7-day medical record review.
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiation Exposure
Time Frame: 7 days
The radiation exposure for imaging protocols of the CT abdomen alone versus CT abdomen and pelvis for study patients in two age groups will be compared: ages 3-17 years and 18-60 years. Using the reported volume CT dose index (CTDI vol), scan length and age specific coefficients for the abdomen/pelvis region of the body, the mean effective radiation doses for CT abdomen alone versus CT abdomen and pelvis will be calculated and compared.
7 days
physicians' pretest probability
Time Frame: 7 days
Determine if physicians' pretest probability accurately identifies clinically significant pelvis, hip and lumbar spine fractures (clinical indications for CT pelvis) in study patients in two age groups: ages 3-17 years and 18-60 years. Using a gestalt pretest probability of ≤ 2% as "negative for injury", and a pretest probability > 2% as "positive for injury", the test characteristics of physician estimation will be determined. The test characteristics and interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa statistic) of the physical examination findings known to predict fractures of the pelvis, hip and lumbar spine in alert, stable patients for each age group will be reported separately.
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stacy Reynolds, MD, Carolinas Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 02-13-19E

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Blunt Abdominal Trauma

3
Subscribe