Comparison of Patient Perceived Pain and Satisfaction Between Lightweight and Heavyweight Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

July 31, 2012 updated by: Adam Pentel, Ascension Genesys Hospital
This study will be comparing the patients overall satisfaction of two different meshes used in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a clinical trial comparing standard therapy in the use of either lightweight or heavy mesh for the repair of inguinal hernias. Both types of these meshes have been approved for surgical correction but subjective comparisons of patient overall satisfaction and perceived outcomes have not been measured. The investigators intend to measure certain subjective data in the form of a questionnaire will be issued to the patient preoperatively, one week, one month, six months, and one year after the surgery There is no recent literature comparing subjective data between two meshes called Ultra Pro and Surgi Pro. The biological effects of these meshes have identical properties as far as the healing process and inflammation as well as the low rate of infection. The main difference is the material that these meshes are composed of. The Ultra Pro is made of Prolene while the Surgi Pro is made of polypropylene.

The risks are not increased anymore than that for normal surgical complications. They each have the same post operative risks including bleeding, infection and pain, but the investigators are investigating a possible subjective difference between these two separate meshes that are currently used.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Grand Blanc, Michigan, United States, 48439
        • Recruiting
        • GenesysRMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients over the age of 18 who are undergoing a unilateral repair of inguinal hernias laparoscopically

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • over the age of 18
  • unilateral side to be repaired
  • no major abdominal surgery previously

Exclusion Criteria:

  • under age 18
  • bilateral repairs undertaken

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
heavy weight mesh
Surgipro mesh is a heavier weighted mesh with less flexibility after surgery
light weight mesh
UltraPro mesh is a lighter weighted mesh with theoretically less stiffness and more flexibility compared to heavier weighted meshes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain
Time Frame: 1 year
Subjective pain scale rating post surgical
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
return to activities of daily living
Time Frame: 1 year
returning to their presurgical lifestyle
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adam P Pentel, DO, Ascension Genesys Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 11, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 1, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2012

Last Verified

July 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ME10 0006

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inguinal Hernia

Subscribe