Preperitoneal Versus Pre-trasversalis Hernia Repair (PPTHR)

May 9, 2011 updated by: San Bonifacio Hospital

Early and Late Results of Transinguinal Preperitoneal Patch Repair Versus Anterior Pre-Trasversalis Mesh Repair. A Randomised Study

Chronic pain rate is from 0 to 50% after prosthetic groin hernia repair. We compared two anterior technique positioning the mesh in the pre-trasversalis space vs preperitoneal space to assess any differences in term of chronic pain and early and late complications

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Chronic pain is evaluated in all presenting types (achy, dull, etc.) moreover foreing body sensation, wall stiffness, paresthesia and numbness are controlled in each patients. Limiting of daily, working, sport and sexual activities (disejaculation) are reported as well.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

253

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • VR
      • San Bonifacio, VR, Italy, 37049
        • San Bonifacio Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • recurrent inguinal hernia
  • previous low abdominal operation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: pre-trasversalis mesh repair group
Inguinal incision is made, external oblique divided and the cord is encircled after identifying ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves. The sac is dissected and reduced, in case of direct hernia the posterior wall of inguinal canal is plicated with polypropylene suture; in presence of indirect hernia the sac is reduced and a stitch is passed in manner that the deep ring is snug about the cord. A pre-shaped mesh is positioned on the floor of the canal around the cord with the two tails overlapping laterally; the mesh is then anchored to the pubic tubercle. External oblique is reapproximated with the cord transposed in the subcutaneous space and skin is sutured.
Other Names:
  • tension free hernia repair
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: trans-inguinal preperitoneal patch group
Through a 5-cm inguinal incision external oblique fascia is divided, cremasteric fibers are separated and the elements of the cord are skeletonized. Indirect or direct hernia is approached and through the hernia orifice, the sac is reduced, preperitoneal space is accessed and dissected to allow easily placement of the patch facilitated by the memory recoil ring. In case of indirect hernia the lateral part of patch is split and the two tails sutured around vas and gonadic vessels. Hernia orifice is closed with a polypropylene stitch through transversalis fascia and the mesh; external oblique is closed followed by skin approximation.
Other Names:
  • Polysoft™ Hernia Patch Bard®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
chronic pain rate
Time Frame: 6 months
phone interview and clinic visit
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
recurrence rate
Time Frame: 2 years
clinic visit
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Francesco Orcalli, M.D., Azienda ULSS 20 Verona

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2007

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 10, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 10, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2011

Last Verified

January 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Indirect Inguinal Hernia

Clinical Trials on anterior hernia repair

3
Subscribe