Valganciclovir Therapy in Infants and Children With Congenital CMV Infection and Hearing Loss

A Phase II Randomized and Controlled Investigation of Six Weeks of Oral Valganciclovir Therapy in Infants and Children With Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection and Hearing Loss

This is an international, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation valganciclovir treatment for up to 54 children (up to 4 years of age) with virologically-confirmed congenital CMV infection and hearing loss. Subject participation will be over a six-month period and study subjects will be stratified according to age. The primary objective is to assess whether a six-week course of oral valganciclovir can stabilize the hearing of children with congenital CMV infection who present with hearing loss.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the most frequent known viral cause of mental retardation, and is the leading non-genetic cause of sensorineural hearing loss in many countries including the United States. This is a Phase II international, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of 6 weeks of oral valganciclovir treatment or 6 weeks of placebo for fifty-four male and female infants/toddlers 1 month through 3 years of age (up to 4 years of age) with virologically-confirmed congenital CMV infection and hearing loss. Patient who are between 1 month and 4 years of age and who have SNHL (Sensorineural Hearing Loss) and are eligible for enrollment. The expected study duration is 3.5 years from enrollment of first study subject. The primary objective is to assess whether a six week course of oral valganciclovir can stabilize the hearing of children with congenital CMV infection who present with hearing loss. The secondary objective is to define the following responses as a function of systemic exposure to ganciclovir (active metabolite of valganciclovir): CMV viral load in blood; CMV viral load in urine; and CMV viral load in saliva. Also, to define the safety and tolerability of valganciclovir in enrolled subjects. The tertiary objective is to define the pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir (metabolite) following administration of valganciclovir (prodrug) in enrolled subjects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B9 5SS
        • Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
      • Crumpsall, United Kingdom, M8 5RB
        • Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, North Manchester General Hospital - Children's and Adolescent Services
      • Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom, OX3 9DU
        • John Radcliffe Hospital - Children's Hospital - Paediatric Infectious Disease and Immunology
      • Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE14LP
        • The Great North Children's Hospital - Paediatric Immunology
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom, S10 2TH
        • Sheffield Children's Hospital - Immunology
      • Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom, SO16 6YD
        • Southampton Children's Hospital - Allergy, Immunology and Infection
    • Bristol, City Of
      • Bristol, Bristol, City Of, United Kingdom, BS2 8BJ
        • Bristol Royal Hospital for Children - Paediatric Immunology
    • London, City Of
      • London, London, City Of, United Kingdom, SW17 0QT
        • Saint George's Hospital - Pediatric Infectious Diseases
      • London, London, City Of, United Kingdom, WC1N 3JH
        • Great Ormond Street Hospital - Infectious Diseases
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233-0011
        • Children's of Alabama Child Health Research Unit (CHRU)
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010-2916
        • Children's National Medical Center - Sheikh Zayed Campus - Infectious Disease
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110-1010
        • Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis - Center for Clinical Studies
    • New York
      • Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030-3816
        • Steven and Alexandra Cohen Childrens Medical Center of New York - New Hyde Park - Infectious Disease
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642-0001
        • University of Rochester Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28203-5812
        • Carolinas Medical Center - Pediatrics - Infectious Diseases
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43205-2664
        • Nationwide Children's Hospital - Neonatology - Center for Perinatal Research
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903-4923
        • Rhode Island Hospital - Pediatrics
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Texas Medical Center - Texas Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 month to 4 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Signed informed consent from parent(s) or legal guardian(s)
  2. Sensorineural hearing loss (>/= 21dB in one or both ears, documented within 12 weeks prior to study entry)
  3. Children from 1 month through 3 years of age (up to the 4th birthday)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Imminent demise
  2. Profound sensorineural hearing loss (> 90dB) in both ears
  3. Patients receiving other antiviral agents or immune globulin
  4. Gastrointestinal abnormality which might preclude absorption of an oral medication (e.g., a history of necrotizing enterocolitis)
  5. Documented renal insufficiency, as noted by a creatinine clearance < 10 mL/min/1.73m2 at time of study enrollment
  6. Breastfeeding from mother who is receiving ganciclovir, valganciclovir, foscarnet, cidofovir, or maribavir
  7. Infants known to be born to women who are HIV positive (but HIV testing is not required for study entry).
  8. Current receipt of other investigational drugs
  9. Previous receipt of ganciclovir or valganciclovir
  10. Known hypersensitivity to ganciclovir, valganciclovir, or components of the product
  11. Inability to attend follow-up hearing and clinical assessments
  12. Infants with Auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony.
  13. Children with another known etiology for SNHL (e.g. connexin 26, syndrome or metabolic disorder associated with SNHL, inner ear malformation and widened vestibular aqueducts, meningitis).

Exclusion of each of these conditions is not required for trial enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active
27 Children between 1 month and 3 years of age (up to 4th birthday) with sensoneural hearing loss and documented CMV infection will receive valganciclovir HCl 16.0 mg/kg orally twice a day for 6 weeks
Valcyte (valganciclovir hydrochloride) 50 mg of valganciclovir free base per 1 mL, oral solution: given at 16.0 mg/kg, twice a day for 6 weeks.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
27 Children between 1 month and 3 years of age (up to 4th birthday) with sensoneural hearing loss and documented CMV infection will receive placebo orally twice a day for 6 weeks
Simple Syrup as 60-90% sucrose in purified water: given orally twice a day for 6 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Ears That Had (1) Improved Hearing or no Change in Hearing (2) Worsened Hearing.
Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 180
A single, independent study audiologist who is masked (blinded) to treatment assignment will assess the audiology test battery for each subject and assign the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications will be assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. At the analyses stage, the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit will be determined; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification will be mild hearing loss. Not both ears are evaluable for all subjects. In some subjects, only one ear is evaluable.
Day 1 through Day 180

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Best Ear That Had (1) Improved Hearing or no Change in Hearing (2) Worsened Hearing [ex. Improved+ no Change (Normal to Normal) Versus Other].
Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 180
A single, independent study audiologist who is masked (blinded) to treatment assignment will assess the audiology test battery for each subject and assign the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications will be assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. At the analyses stage, the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit will be determined; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification will be mild hearing loss. For this outcome, we combine the improved hearing and no change for the special case only of normal to normal. Other category include worsened and no change from (1) mild to mild hearing loss, (2) moderate to moderate hearing loss, or (3) severe to severe hearing loss.
Day 1 through Day 180
Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments [Improved Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.
Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 180
A single, independent study audiologist who is masked (blinded) to treatment assignment will assess the audiology test battery for each subject and assign the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications will be assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. At the analyses stage, the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit will be determined; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification will be mild hearing loss.
Day 1 through Day 180
Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments [Worse + no Change (Abnormal to Abnormal) Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.
Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 180
A single, independent study audiologist who is masked (blinded) to treatment assignment will assess the audiology test battery for each subject and assign the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications will be assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. At the analyses stage, the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit will be determined; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification will be mild hearing loss.
Day 1 through Day 180
Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments [Worse Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.
Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 180
A single, independent study audiologist who is masked (blinded) to treatment assignment will assess the audiology test battery for each subject and assign the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications will be assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. At the analyses stage, the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit will be determined; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification will be mild hearing loss.
Day 1 through Day 180
Change in Total Ear Hearing Assessments [Improved Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.
Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 180
A single, independent study audiologist who is masked (blinded) to treatment assignment will assess the audiology test battery for each subject and assign the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications will be assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. At the analyses stage, the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit will be determined; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification will be mild hearing loss.
Day 1 through Day 180
Change in Total Ear Hearing Assessments [Worse+ no Change (Abnormal to Abnormal) Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.
Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 180
A single, independent study audiologist who is masked (blinded) to treatment assignment will assess the audiology test battery for each subject and assign the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications will be assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. At the analyses stage, the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit will be determined; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification will be mild hearing loss.
Day 1 through Day 180
Change in Total Ear Hearing Assessments [Worse Versus Other] Between Baseline and Study Month 6.
Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 180
A single, independent study audiologist who is masked (blinded) to treatment assignment will assess the audiology test battery for each subject and assign the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications will be assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. At the analyses stage, the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit will be determined; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification will be mild hearing loss.
Day 1 through Day 180
Association of Change in Viral Load (Blood) With Change in Total Ear Hearing at 6 Months
Time Frame: At 6 months
Analysis of actual viral load was done using log base 10 transformation. Undetectable viral load value was replaced by a value of 10. A summary measure of the viral load over time considers all time points available by calculating the average area under the curve (AUC) (trapezoidal rule) applied to the log base 10 viral load. Average is based on the maximum period of time with viral load data for a given subject. The average or standardize AUC units is therefore the original AUC units of log 10 copies/ml*days divided by days in study which equals log 10 copies/ml.
At 6 months
Association of Change in Viral Load (Saliva) With Change in Total Ear Hearing at 6 Months
Time Frame: At 6 months
Analysis of actual viral load was done using log base 10 transformation. Undetectable viral load value was replaced by a value of 10. A summary measure of the viral load over time considers all time points available by calculating the average area under the curve (AUC) (trapezoidal rule) applied to the log base 10 viral load. Average is based on the maximum period of time with viral load data for a given subject. The average or standardize AUC units is therefore the original AUC units or log 10 copies/ml*days divided by days in study which equals log 10 copies/ml.
At 6 months
Association of Change in Viral Load (Urine) With Change in Total Ear Hearing at 6 Months
Time Frame: At 6 months
Analysis of actual viral load was done using log base 10 transformation. Undetectable viral load value was replaced by a value of 10. A summary measure of the viral load over time considers all time points available by calculating the average area under the curve (AUC) (trapezoidal rule) applied to the log base 10 viral load. Average is based on the maximum period of time with viral load data for a given subject. The average or standardize AUC units is therefore the original AUC units of log 10 copies/ml*days divided by days in study which equals log 10 copies/ml.
At 6 months
Association of Change in Viral Load (Blood) With Change in Best Ear Hearing at 6 Months
Time Frame: At 6 months
Analysis of actual viral load was done using log base 10 transformation. Undetectable viral load value was replaced by a value of 10. A summary measure of the viral load over time considers all time points available by calculating the average area under the curve (AUC) (trapezoidal rule) applied to the log base 10 viral load. Average is based on the maximum period of time with viral load data for a given subject. The average or standardize AUC units is therefore the original AUC units of log 10 copies/ml*days divided by days in study which equals log 10 copies/ml.
At 6 months
Association of Change in Viral Load (Saliva) With Change in Best Ear Hearing at 6 Months
Time Frame: At 6 months
Analysis of actual viral load was done using log base 10 transformation. Undetectable viral load value was replaced by a value of 10. A summary measure of the viral load over time considers all time points available by calculating the average area under the curve (AUC) (trapezoidal rule) applied to the log base 10 viral load. Average is based on the maximum period of time with viral load data for a given subject. The average or standardize AUC units is therefore the original AUC units of log 10 copies/ml*days divided by days in study which equals log 10 copies/ml.
At 6 months
Association of Change in Viral Load (Urine) With Change in Best Ear Hearing at 6 Months
Time Frame: At 6 months
Analysis of actual viral load was done using log base 10 transformation. Undetectable viral load value was replaced by a value of 10. A summary measure of the viral load over time considers all time points available by calculating the average area under the curve (AUC) (trapezoidal rule) applied to the log base 10 viral load. Average is based on the maximum period of time with viral load data for a given subject. The average or standardize AUC units is therefore the original AUC units of log 10 copies/ml*days divided by days in study which equals log 10 copies/ml.
At 6 months
Detection of Viruria (Urine) by PCR Six Weeks After Trial Entry
Time Frame: At 6 weeks (Day 42)
Each subject either has positive or negative PCR results. Virus is detected if the PCR is positive.
At 6 weeks (Day 42)
Detection of Viruria (Urine) by PCR Six Month After Trial Entry
Time Frame: At 6 months
Each subject either has positive or negative PCR results. Virus is detected if the PCR is positive.
At 6 months
Detection of Viremia (Blood) by PCR Six Weeks After Trial Entry
Time Frame: At 6 weeks (Day 42)
Each subject either has positive or negative PCR results. Virus is detected if the PCR is positive.
At 6 weeks (Day 42)
Detection of Viremia (Blood) by PCR Six Month After Trial Entry
Time Frame: At 6 months
Each subject either has positive or negative PCR results. Virus is detected if the PCR is positive.
At 6 months
Detection of CMV in Saliva by PCR Six Weeks After Trial Entry
Time Frame: At 6 weeks (Day 42)
Each subject either has positive or negative PCR results. Virus is detected if the PCR is positive.
At 6 weeks (Day 42)
Detection of CMV in Saliva PCR Six Month After Trial Entry
Time Frame: At 6 months
Each subject either has positive or negative PCR results. Virus is detected if the PCR is positive.
At 6 months
The Quantitative Log Change in Viremia From Baseline to Month 6.
Time Frame: Baseline to month 6
The quantitative change (Month 6 minus baseline) in viremia (blood) Quantitative viral load by PCR in log 10 units measured in urine after 6 weeks of therapy; if undetectable, viral load is assigned a value of 10 (1 in log 10 units).
Baseline to month 6
The Quantitative Log Reduction in Viruria Detected After 6 Weeks of Therapy
Time Frame: Baseline thru months 6
The quantitative log reduction in viruria (urine) detected after 6 weeks of therapy. Quantitative viral load by PCR in log 10 units measured in urine after 6 weeks of therapy; if undetectable, viral load is assigned a value of 10 (1 in log 10 units)
Baseline thru months 6
The Quantitative Log Reduction in CMV in Saliva Detected After 6 Weeks of Therapy
Time Frame: Baseline thru months 6
The quantitative log reduction in CMV in saliva (urine) detected after 6 weeks of therapy. Quantitative viral load by PCR in log 10 units measured in urine after 6 weeks of therapy; if undetectable, viral load is assigned a value of 10 (1 in log 10 units)
Baseline thru months 6
Number of Adverse Events in the Active Group That Resulted in Discontinuation of Valganciclovir
Time Frame: Day 1 thru day 70
AE resulting in discontinuation of valganciclovir (active group only). This outcome summarizes the number of adverse events (AEs) that resulted in the discontinuation of valganciclovir in the active group only.
Day 1 thru day 70
Adverse Event (AE) Resulting in Unresolved Outcome
Time Frame: Day 1 thru day 70
Adverse event resulting in unresolved outcome. This outcome summarizes the number of adverse events (AEs) that resulted in unresolved outcome of that AE.
Day 1 thru day 70
Adverse Event (AE) Resulting in Unanticipated Medically Attended Visit
Time Frame: Day 1 thru day 70
Adverse event resulting in unanticipated medically attended visit. This outcome summarizes the number of adverse events (AEs) that resulted in the unanticipated medically attended visit.
Day 1 thru day 70

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 24, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 24, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 24, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

July 25, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2024

Last Verified

March 22, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cytomegalovirus Infection

Clinical Trials on Valganciclovir

Subscribe