Sputum Cytometry Analysis in Lung Cancer Screening After Professional Asbestos Exposure (AMORCE-CBP)

April 8, 2014 updated by: University Hospital, Caen

Interest of Morphometric Analysis of Sputum Cytology for Lung Cancer Screening in Workers Highly Exposed to Asbestos - Exploratory Analysis of Biomarkers Predictive for Lung Cancer

Workers exposed to asbestos are at high risk of lung cancer. Medical follow-up of this population relies on repeated CT-scans which are more accurate for detection of peripheral lesions, and expose to X-rays and to risk of false-positives. Analysis of sputum using automate cytometry may be of interest in this population, alone or in combination with CT-scan.

An ancillary study will evaluate the interest of blood predictive biomarkers.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1000

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Caen, France, 14000
        • CAEN University Hospital
      • Le Havre, France, 76600
        • Le Havre Hospital
      • Rouen, France, 76031
        • Rouen University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

56 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • High professional asbestos exposure
  • Member of a former cohort recruited between 2000 and 2006 in Caen, Rouen and Le Havre (inclusion criteria: 50-75 years at the time of initial recruitment, high intermittent asbestos exposure >= 1 year, or high discontinuous asbestos exposure >=10 years). All the living members of the cohort will be contacted: a maximum of 1000 subjects is expected, probably less.
  • Informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Personal history of lung cancer
  • Refusal of the study protocol
  • Uncontrolled asthma or lung failure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Screening
Paired-design: low-dose CT scan, sputum sample and blood test will be performed on all subjects.
All subjects will receive a low-dose CT-scan, a blood test (ancillary study) and provide an induced sputum

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Risk of false positive
Time Frame: within 3 months
Ratio of false positives (RFP) for detection of lung cancer in reference to conventional cytology analysis of sputum
within 3 months
detection of lung cancer
Time Frame: within 3 months
Ratio of sensitivities for detection of lung cancer in reference to conventionnal cytology analysis of sputum
within 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity for lung cancer detection compared with CT-scan
Time Frame: within 3 months

Ratio of sensitivity (RSN) for lung cancer detection in reference with CT scan.

Interest of the combination "cytometry + CT-scan" compared with CT-scan alone will also be evaluated.

within 3 months
Specificity for detection of lung cancer
Time Frame: within 3 months

Ratio of false positives (RFP) of automated cytometry analysis compared with CT-scan screening.

The combination "automated cytometry + CTscan" will also be evaluated compared with CT scan alone.

within 3 months
Predictive Biomarkers
Time Frame: Annually during a maximum of 5 years
Frequency of specific biomarkers at the time of screening. Links between lung cancer during 5 years of prospective follow-up.
Annually during a maximum of 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Lydia GUITTET, MD,PhD, Caen University Hospital, INSERM

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

September 19, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 9, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2011-A01380-41
  • PHRC11-221 (Other Grant/Funding Number: French Ministry of Health (DGOS))

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on low-dose CT-scan AND induced sputum sample AND blood test

3
Subscribe