Implementation Effectiveness and Safety of Tenofovir Gel Provision Through Family Planning Services

November 7, 2019 updated by: Dr Quarraisha Abdool Karim, Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa

Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Implementation Effectiveness and Safety of 1% Tenofovir Gel Provision Through Family Planning Services in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of an implementation model which integrates tenofovir gel provision into existing family planning services.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The CAPRISA 008 trial is a two-arm, open-label, randomized controlled trial that is being conducted at the CAPRISA eThekwini and CAPRISA Vulindlela Clinics and their neighboring public sector family planning services in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Up to 700 consenting sexually active, HIV-uninfected women aged 18 years and older who previously participated in an antiretroviral (ARV) prevention study will be enrolled and followed for a maximum 30 months. All women will be provided with 1% tenofovir gel but will be randomised to either receive their gel through a public sector family planning services with 2-3 monthly provision (intervention arm) or through the CAPRISA research clinics with monthly provision (control arm).

All women in the trial will be provided with the standard package of HIV prevention and reproductive health services. Participants in both study arms will be provided with a supply of single-use, pre-filled applicators of 1% tenofovir gel. While in the study, participants will be advised and supported to follow the CAPRISA 004 pre- and post-dosing strategy, namely BAT24, where the first dose of tenofovir gel is applied within 12 hours before anticipated coitus and a second dose as soon as possible but within 12 hours after coitus, with a maximum of two doses of gel in a 24-hour period.

The primary objective of this trial is to assess the effectiveness of an implementation model for tenofovir gel provision through family planning services.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

372

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • KwaZulu-Natal
      • Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, 4001
        • CAPRISA eThekwini Clinical Research Site
      • Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
        • CAPRISA Vulindlela Clinical Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years and older
  • Women who previously participated in an ARV prevention study
  • Currently utilizing or agreeing to attend designated public sector family planning services
  • Able and willing to provide first person informed consent to be screened for, and to enroll in, the study
  • Able and willing to provide adequate locator information for study retention purposes
  • Sexually active (at least one coital act in the last 3 months prior to screening)
  • HIV negative (by HIV testing performed by study staff within 30 days of enrollment)
  • Negative pregnancy test performed by study staff within 21 days of enrollment
  • Agree to use a non-barrier form of contraceptive
  • Agree to adhere to study visits and procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a creatinine clearance < 50ml/min
  • Has any other condition that, based on the opinion of the Investigator or designee, would preclude provision of informed consent, make participation in the study unsafe, complicate interpretation of study outcome data, or otherwise interfere with achieving the study objectives

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
1% tenofovir gel provision through a public sector family planning services with 2-3 monthly provision and monitoring and the use of Quality Improvement methodology to promote reliable service delivery

Participants will be randomized to receive 1% tenofovir gel through either:

  • Public sector family planning services with 2-3 monthly provision and monitoring of 1% tenofovir gel and the use of QI methodology to promote reliable service delivery (intervention arm), or
  • The CAPRISA research clinics with monthly provision and monitoring of 1% tenofovir gel (control arm).
Active Comparator: Control
monthly 1% tenofovir gel provision and monitoring through CAPRISA research clinics

Participants will be randomized to receive 1% tenofovir gel through either:

  • Public sector family planning services with 2-3 monthly provision and monitoring of 1% tenofovir gel and the use of QI methodology to promote reliable service delivery (intervention arm), or
  • The CAPRISA research clinics with monthly provision and monitoring of 1% tenofovir gel (control arm).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Number of Returned Used Applicators Per Month (i.e in 30 Days)
Time Frame: Between 2012 to 2015, up to 28 months
The primary endpoint is the mean number of returned used applicators per month. Since participants in the intervention arm followed two and three monthly schedule (as opposed to monthly in the intervention arm), the number of returned used applicators per month for each participant will be estimated as the total number of returned applicators at that visit divided by the number of days since the previous visit, multiplied by 30. Thus a uniform distribution of gel use will be assumed in participants whom we did not see monthly. Intent to treat and per protocol analyses were carried out of this outcome. Intent to treat population includes all participants who were randomized, met pre-randomization eligibility criteria and who have post-enrollment follow-up data. The per protocol population is a subset of the intent to treat population.The per-protocol analysis excluded visits where no gel had been dispensed for >120 days.
Between 2012 to 2015, up to 28 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HIV Incidence Rates
Time Frame: Between 2012 and 2015, up to 28 months
Time to HIV infection was calculated as the difference between estimated date of infection (midpoint between the last negative HIV test date and the first confirmed positive HIV test date) and enrolment date, plus one. Where a participant has a positive PCR and a negative rapid test on the same date, the date of infection is calculated as 14 days prior to this date. Women who do not become HIV positive before their last study visit will be censored on the day of their last negative HIV test. Their follow-up time will be calculated as the difference between date of censoring and enrolment date, plus one.
Between 2012 and 2015, up to 28 months
Pregnancy Incidence Rates
Time Frame: Between 2012 and 2015, up to 28 months
Time to pregnancy, was as the difference between the estimated date of conception and the enrolment date, plus one. The date of conception was defined as 14 days after the last normal menstrual period or the estimated date of delivery minus 40 weeks if the first date of last normal menstrual period is not available or the midpoint between the date of the first positive pregnancy test and the date of the previous negative pregnancy test. The censoring time for a woman who did not become pregnant during the study equals the difference between the calculated censoring date and the enrolment date, plus one.
Between 2012 and 2015, up to 28 months
Percentage of Participants Achieving Adherence >80%.
Time Frame: Between 2012 and 2015, up to 28 months
Self-reported adherence to the tenofovir gel dosing strategy.Gel adherence was defined as the estimated proportion of reported sex acts covered by two gel doses and calculated for each woman by dividing half the number of returned used applicators each month by the number of reported sex acts that month.For participants attending 2-3 monthly clinic visits, their number of gels used in the last 30 days will be estimated as the total number of returned used gels, divided by the number of days between the current and the previous visit, times 30.
Between 2012 and 2015, up to 28 months
HIV Viral Load Among HIV Seroconverters
Time Frame: Between 2012 and 2015, up to 28 months
This is mean log transformed HIV viral load measured at the first visit post HIV infection.
Between 2012 and 2015, up to 28 months
Tenofovir Resistance Among HIV Seroconverters
Time Frame: Between 2012 and 2015, up to 28 months
Between 2012 and 2015, up to 28 months
Human Papillomavirus Incidence Rates
Time Frame: Between 2012 and 2015, up to 28 months
For the calculation of the incidence rate, seroconversion was assumed to have occurred at the midpoint between the first positive HPV test and the previous HPV negative test.
Between 2012 and 2015, up to 28 months
Percentage of Participants With Detectable Tenofovir Levels From Vaginal Samples at 12 Months of Follow-up
Time Frame: All participants with drug levels at 12 months of follow-up
Percentage of participants with detectable tenofovir levels from vaginal samples at 12 months of follow-up. All drug levels below limit of quantification were considered to be undetectable.
All participants with drug levels at 12 months of follow-up
Product Acceptability
Time Frame: At study completion, up to 28 months
This is the number of participants who reported that they liked the study product. The questionnaire was administered at study exit, therefore participants who were loss to follow-up and those who died could not complete the questionnaire.
At study completion, up to 28 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Quarraisha Abdool Karim, PhD, Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

September 25, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on 1% tenofovir gel

Subscribe