Preference Tiotropium Respimat Study in COPD

March 16, 2015 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

Cross-sectional Study to Assess the Handling , Patient Satisfaction, and Preference for Inhalation Devices in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

In COPD the patient's ability to use inhalers correctly and their preference for the inhaler are both important factors in selecting an appropriate treatment for COPD. This is a cross-sectional study where satisfaction, preference and handling of two different devices such as Respimat and Breezhaler will be evaluated by using the validated PASAPQ in COPD patients

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Purpose:

Study Design:

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • A Coruña, Spain
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 13
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 5
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 6
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 8
      • Burgos, Spain
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 12
      • Galdako., Spain
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 14
      • Laredo, Spain
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 11
      • Málaga, Spain
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
      • Mérida, Spain
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 3
      • Palma de Mallorca., Spain
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 15
      • Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 9
      • Sabadell, Spain
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 7
      • Sevilla, Spain
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
      • Torrelodones, Spain
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 10
      • Villanueva de la Serena, Spain
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

COPD

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. All patients must sign an informed consent consistent with International Conference on Harmonization - Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) guidelines prior to participation in the study and conducting any study procedures.
  2. Adult male or female patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for less than a year who follow usual clinical practice of the participant sites and who are on treatment with Spiriva® Respimat®, Hirobriz® Breezhaler® / Onbrez® Breezhaler® / Oslif® Breezhaler® for at least of 3 months but not more than maximum of 6 months before the informed consent date.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Previously included in this study or currently participating in another interventional study.
  2. Visual, cognitive, or motor impairment that as judged by the investigator does not allow the patient to independently read and complete the questionnaire.
  3. Patients who are treated simultaneously with both respiratory medications (Spiriva® Respimat® and Hirobriz® Breezhaler® / Onbrez® Breezhaler® / Oslif® Breezhaler®).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Group 1
COPD patients using Respimat®
Group 2
COPD patients using Breezhaler®®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Mean Score of the Validated Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ)
Time Frame: day 1
Patient satisfaction with regard to the total score of the handling of the inhaled devices performed by means of a PASAPQ. All questions were answered on a 7-point scale ranging from 1= very dissatisfied to 7 = very satisfied).To calculate the total score, the sum of the 13 items of the two domains (performance and convenience) was transformed to a 0- (least) to 100- (most) point scale which is scaled positively:higher scores represent higher levels of satisfaction.
day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Performance PASAPQ Score.
Time Frame: day 1
All questions were answered on a 7-point scale ranging from 1= very dissatisfied to 7 = very satisfied).To calculate the domain scores, the sum of the items of the performance domain was transformed to a 0- (least) to 100- (most) point scale which is scaled positively:higher scores represent higher levels of satisfaction.
day 1
Total Convenience PASAPQ Score
Time Frame: day 1
All questions were answered on a 7-point scale ranging from 1= very dissatisfied to 7 = very satisfied).To calculate the domain scores, the sum of the items of the convenience domain was transformed to a 0- (least) to 100- (most) point scale which is scaled positively:higher scores represent higher levels of satisfaction.
day 1
Overall Satisfaction Question
Time Frame: day 1
The overall satisfaction ranges from 1=very dissatisfied to 7=very satisfied.
day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 13, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 26, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe