- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01810692
Preference Tiotropium Respimat Study in COPD
March 16, 2015 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim
Cross-sectional Study to Assess the Handling , Patient Satisfaction, and Preference for Inhalation Devices in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
In COPD the patient's ability to use inhalers correctly and their preference for the inhaler are both important factors in selecting an appropriate treatment for COPD.
This is a cross-sectional study where satisfaction, preference and handling of two different devices such as Respimat and Breezhaler will be evaluated by using the validated PASAPQ in COPD patients
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Purpose:
Study Design:
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
150
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
A Coruña, Spain
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 13
-
Barcelona, Spain
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 5
-
Barcelona, Spain
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 6
-
Barcelona, Spain
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 8
-
Burgos, Spain
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 12
-
Galdako., Spain
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 14
-
Laredo, Spain
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 11
-
Málaga, Spain
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
-
Mérida, Spain
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 3
-
Palma de Mallorca., Spain
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 15
-
Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 9
-
Sabadell, Spain
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 7
-
Sevilla, Spain
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
-
Torrelodones, Spain
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 10
-
Villanueva de la Serena, Spain
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 4
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
COPD
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- All patients must sign an informed consent consistent with International Conference on Harmonization - Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) guidelines prior to participation in the study and conducting any study procedures.
- Adult male or female patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for less than a year who follow usual clinical practice of the participant sites and who are on treatment with Spiriva® Respimat®, Hirobriz® Breezhaler® / Onbrez® Breezhaler® / Oslif® Breezhaler® for at least of 3 months but not more than maximum of 6 months before the informed consent date.
Exclusion criteria:
- Previously included in this study or currently participating in another interventional study.
- Visual, cognitive, or motor impairment that as judged by the investigator does not allow the patient to independently read and complete the questionnaire.
- Patients who are treated simultaneously with both respiratory medications (Spiriva® Respimat® and Hirobriz® Breezhaler® / Onbrez® Breezhaler® / Oslif® Breezhaler®).
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Group 1
|
COPD patients using Respimat®
|
|
Group 2
|
COPD patients using Breezhaler®®
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total Mean Score of the Validated Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ)
Time Frame: day 1
|
Patient satisfaction with regard to the total score of the handling of the inhaled devices performed by means of a PASAPQ.
All questions were answered on a 7-point scale ranging from 1= very dissatisfied to 7 = very satisfied).To calculate the total score, the sum of the 13 items of the two domains (performance and convenience) was transformed to a 0- (least) to 100- (most) point scale which is scaled positively:higher scores represent higher levels of satisfaction.
|
day 1
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total Performance PASAPQ Score.
Time Frame: day 1
|
All questions were answered on a 7-point scale ranging from 1= very dissatisfied to 7 = very satisfied).To calculate the domain scores, the sum of the items of the performance domain was transformed to a 0- (least) to 100- (most) point scale which is scaled positively:higher scores represent higher levels of satisfaction.
|
day 1
|
|
Total Convenience PASAPQ Score
Time Frame: day 1
|
All questions were answered on a 7-point scale ranging from 1= very dissatisfied to 7 = very satisfied).To calculate the domain scores, the sum of the items of the convenience domain was transformed to a 0- (least) to 100- (most) point scale which is scaled positively:higher scores represent higher levels of satisfaction.
|
day 1
|
|
Overall Satisfaction Question
Time Frame: day 1
|
The overall satisfaction ranges from 1=very dissatisfied to 7=very satisfied.
|
day 1
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2013
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
March 1, 2014
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
March 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 12, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 12, 2013
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
March 13, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
March 26, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 16, 2015
Last Verified
March 1, 2015
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Lung Diseases, Obstructive
- Lung Diseases
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Parasympatholytics
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Cholinergic Antagonists
- Cholinergic Agents
- Bronchodilator Agents
- Anti-Asthmatic Agents
- Respiratory System Agents
- Tiotropium Bromide
Other Study ID Numbers
- 205.514
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.