Rapid Evaluation for Stroke Outcomes Using Lytics in Vascular Event (RESOLVE) Registry and Implementation Quality Improvement Study (RESOLVE)

October 14, 2021 updated by: Saint Luke's Health System

Reperfusion in Acute Stroke - Creating the Clinical Decision-Making Tool (RESOLVE)

Despite abundant evident supporting the use of acute reperfusion therapy in the setting of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), adoption of this practice in routine clinical care is poor. We hypothesize that a significant barrier is the difficulty in weighing the benefits and risks of rt-PA treatment in the care of an individual patient, a problem compounded by the time urgency of decision-making and clinical fears that weigh risks of treatment more heavily than benefits.

The goal of this Quality Improvement (QI) study is to leverage an IT solution that we have developed, ePRISM, that executes multivariable risk models with patient-specific data so that a personalized estimate of an individual's outcomes (both risks and benefits) with and without rt-PA, can be generated so support safer, more effective clinical care. Through an earlier project, we will have programmed ePRISM with the best available risk-stratification models and developed a clinically useful format for presenting the data to support clinical decision-making in AIS.

Through QI, we propose to identify the optimal mechanism for integrating the tool within the routine flow of patient care in preparation for more definitive studies, or dissemination strategies, to improve the treatment of patients with AIS.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Specific Aim 1: Implement ePRISM and the RESOLVE Decision Aid (DA) at 2 sites (Saint Luke's Hospital in Kansas City and Saint Luke's North) for Emergency Department (ED) access and decision support.

1. Procedures and Evaluation

  1. Map process flow and define the optimal points of care for both the informed consent and decision aid.
  2. Pre-implementation registry or data retrieval of patient/family satisfaction with information during consent process pre-PRISM, as well as time from presentation to treatment.
  3. Implementation of ePRISM software and the RESOLVE DA.
  4. Monitor proportion of patients in whom the RESOLVE DA is used.
  5. Post-implementation registry or data retrieval of patient/family satisfaction and knowledge, as well as time from presentation to treatment.
  6. Interviews of providers on confidence in making treatment decisions.
  7. Monitor patient outcomes through 90 day follow up phone call as per the standard of care.

Specific Aim 2: Implement ePRISM and the RESOLVE DA onsite at the the Barnes Jewish Hospital Emergency Department. After optimizing the integration of ePRISM and the RESOLVE DA at Saint Luke's Hospital and Saint Luke's North, we will evaluate strategies for implementation at Barnes Jewish Hospital's Emergency Department Telestroke Program.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

192

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute ischemic stroke
  • 18 years of age or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active internal bleeding
  • History of cerebrovascular accident
  • Evidence of intracranial hemorrhage on pretreatment evaluation
  • Suspicion of subarachnoid hemorrhage on pretreatment evaluation
  • Recent (within 3 months) intracranial or intraspinal surgery, serious head trauma, or previous stroke
  • History of intracranial hemorrhage
  • Uncontrolled hypertension at time of treatment
  • Seizure at the onset of stroke
  • Intracranial neoplasm, arteriovenous malformation, or aneurysm
  • Known bleeding diathesis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Stroke population
Adults with ischemic stroke.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful implementation of ePRISM and the RESOLVE DA in 3 ED's and a telestroke program.
Time Frame: 2 years
Successful implementation of ePRISM and the RESOLVE DA in 3 ED's and a telestroke program. Successful implementation is defined as: 1) the activation of ePRISM and generation the RESOLVE DA by ePRISM; 2) the staff and clinician's reported value of the new RESOLVE DA for use during the rt-PA decision making process.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient/family satisfaction.
Time Frame: 2 years
Patient/family satisfaction with PRISM for Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS).
2 years
Knowledge transfer.
Time Frame: 2 years
Knowledge transfer of AIS and rt-PA risks and benefits through survey.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Carole Decker, MSN, PhD, Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 30, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Ischemic Stroke

3
Subscribe