Effect of Different Methodologies on Variability of Brachial Artery Flow Mediated Dilation

July 11, 2013 updated by: Lian Engelen, Maastricht University Medical Center

Effect of Different Methodologies on Reliability of Flow Mediated Dilation as Measurement Tool: Meta-regression Analysis to Determine Minimum Quality Standards

Flow mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery has been widely used as a non-invasive measure of endothelial function. FMD independently predicts future cardiovascular events and can be readily influenced by pharmacological, dietary or lifestyle interventions. However, the interpretation of FMD data is currently importantly hampered by differences in measurement methodologies and analysis techniques between laboratories. These differences result in large variation of 'normal' values between laboratories, highlighting the need for adopting widely supported and evidence-based guidelines.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

Background: Flow mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery has been widely used as a non-invasive measure of endothelial function. FMD independently predicts future cardiovascular events and can be readily influenced by pharmacological, dietary or lifestyle interventions.

Need for a review: Differences in methodology, guidelines (to control for moderating factors) and analysis techniques contribute to large variation in FMD between laboratories, limiting the widespread use and interpretation of FMD data.

Objectives: To identify methodological and technological factors that contributes to the variability (i.e. repeatability) of the brachial artery FMD. This will allow for development of quality guidelines for FMD measurement based on systematic data analysis.

Design: The planning and conduct of the proposed meta-analyses will follow the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The reporting will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE Chemical Abstracts, Biosis and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched using appropriate search terms.

Study selection: Observational cohorts and control groups of intervention studies with ≥ 50 subjects.

Methods: A list of quality criteria for scoring of FMD data will be defined both by expert consensus and by thorough review of the literature. Subsequently, a database of brachial artery FMD data (from published data and available individual data) will be compiled. The investigators will investigate which of the quality criteria significantly contribute to the variability of FMD by multiple meta-regression analyses. This data set will also allow us to investigate which quality criteria have the strongest impact on the variability of the FMD, to further refine the list of quality criteria.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

15000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Pisa, Italy
        • University of Pisa
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
      • Vlaardingen, Netherlands
        • Unilever R&D Vlaardingen
      • Wageningen, Netherlands
        • Top Institute Food and Nutrition

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults - varied

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Observational cohorts and control groups of intervention studies with ≥ 50 subjects

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ≤ 50 subjects
  • Any co-intervention in control groups of intervention studies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Brachial artery flow mediated dilation (FMD) analysis
Time Frame: 10 years
10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lorenzo Ghiadoni, University of Pisa
  • Principal Investigator: Dick Thijssen, Radboud University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 16, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 16, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2013

Last Verified

July 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endothelial Dysfunction

3
Subscribe