- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01986712
A Study to Compare Quality of Life and Compliance in Patients Receiving High-dose Interferon Versus Pegylated Interferon in Patients With Surgically Resected Melanoma
An Observational Pilot Study to Compare the Compliance With and Health Related Quality of Life During Therapy With Standard High-Dose Interferon Alfa (Intron A, HDI) Versus Pegylated Alfa-Interferon 2b (Sylatron, PEG IFN) in Patients With Surgically Resected Melanoma
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
The primary objective of this study is:
• To evaluate compliance with the administration of standard HDI versus PEG IFN for patients with melanoma in need of adjuvant therapy
The secondary objectives of this study are:
- To compare the convenience and satisfaction with chemotherapy for patients on standard HDI versus PEG IFN using a chemotherapy convenience and satisfaction questionnaire (CCSQ) and to evaluate the treatment-related side effects that may impact the patient's HRQOL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy of Biologic Response Modifier (FACT BRM)
- To assess the frequency of Grade 3 and 4 toxicities, according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) for patients on standard HDI versus PEG IFN
- To examine reasons for patients' choice of treatment with HDI versus PEG IFN, for those cases in which patients are presented with a choice of either treatment option
- To assess Health Resource Utilization on both arms of the study
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
- Moffit Cancer Center
-
-
New York
-
Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States, 18015
- St Luke's University Hospital and Health Network
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112-5550
- Huntsman Cancer Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient is male or female at least 18 years of age
- Patient has had surgically resected melanoma and plans to receive adjuvant therapy with HDI or PEG IFN
- Patient is willing and able to give written informed consent
- Patient is willing to comply with all study requirements
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient is unable or unwilling to complete QoL questionaire or compliance diary
- Patient has a history of anaphylaxis due to any interferon alpha product
- Patient has autoimmune hepatitis
- Patient has decompensated liver disease (Child-Pugh score>6 ( Class B and C)
- Patient has a history of neuropsychiatric disorder (including depression) that, in the judgment of the investigator, may impair the patient's ability to successfully complete treatment or protocol-related requirements
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Intron A, HDI
High-dose interferon alfa (Intron A, HDI)
|
|
Sylatron
Pegylated alfa-interferon 2b (Sylatron, PEG IFN)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluate Compliance With Standard High Dose Interferon (HDI) Versus Sylatron
Time Frame: 1 year
|
To evaluate compliance with administration of standard HDI versus PEG IFN for patients with surgically resected melanoma in need of adjuvant therapy
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Compare Quality of Life (Qol)for Patients on HDI Versus PEG IFN
Time Frame: baseline -week 1, week 3, week 13, week 25, week 50
|
To compare QOL for patients on standard HDI versus PEG IFN using chemotherapy convenience and satisfaction questionnaire (CCSQ). The CCSQ measures the construct "chemotherapy convenience and satisfaction" and includes 10 questions [scores from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much"), maximum possible summative score = 40]. Higher scores signify a better outcome. Minimum possible summative score = 0. |
baseline -week 1, week 3, week 13, week 25, week 50
|
|
Assess the Frequency of Grade 3 and Grade 4 Toxicities
Time Frame: baseline-week 1, week 3, week 13, week 25, week 50
|
To assess the frequency of Grade 3 and 4 toxicities, according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) for patients on standard HDI versus PEG IFN
|
baseline-week 1, week 3, week 13, week 25, week 50
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reason For Choice of Treatment With HDI Versus PEG IFN
Time Frame: baseline-week 1, week 3, week 13, week 25, week 50
|
To examine reasons for patients' choice of treatment HDI versus PEG IFN, for those cases in which patients are presented with a choice of either treatment option (percentage answering "very important", "somewhat important", or "not important" for "frequency", "toxicity", "effectiveness", "convenience", and "length").
|
baseline-week 1, week 3, week 13, week 25, week 50
|
|
Treatment-Related Side Effects Impacting Health-Related Quality of Life (FACT-BRM)
Time Frame: Baseline-week 1, Week 3, week 13 week 25, week 50
|
To compare QOL for patients on standard HDI versus PEG IFN using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - biologic response modifier, questionnaire (FACT-BRM). The FACT-BRM measures the construct "Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy" and includes 40 questions [scores from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much"), maximum possible summative score = 160]. Due to the nature of their items, the Social/Family Well-Being and Functional Well-Being subscale scores were reverse coded. For the summative score, higher scores signify a worse outcome. Minimum possible summative score = 0. |
Baseline-week 1, Week 3, week 13 week 25, week 50
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Neil Belman, DO, St. Luke's Hospital and Health Network, Pennsylvania
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Merck MISP 50422
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Melanoma
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingMucosal Melanoma | Anal Melanoma | Bladder Melanoma | Cervical Melanoma | Esophageal Melanoma | Gallbladder Melanoma | Oral Cavity Mucosal Melanoma | Penile Mucosal Melanoma | Rectal Melanoma | Recurrent Mucosal Melanoma | Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma | Urethral Melanoma | Vaginal Melanoma | Vulvar Melanoma | Head and... and other conditionsUnited States, Canada
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Melanoma | Stage IV Melanoma | Mucosal Melanoma | Ciliary Body and Choroid Melanoma, Medium/Large Size | Ciliary Body and Choroid Melanoma, Small Size | Iris Melanoma | Metastatic Intraocular Melanoma | Recurrent Intraocular Melanoma | Stage IV Intraocular Melanoma | Stage IIIA Melanoma | Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Melanoma | Stage IIIA Melanoma | Stage IIIB Melanoma | Stage IIIC Melanoma | Stage IIB Melanoma | Stage IIC Melanoma | Stage IA Melanoma | Stage IB Melanoma | Stage IIA MelanomaUnited States
-
Fudan UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Melanoma | Stage IV Melanoma | Stage IIIA Melanoma | Stage IIIB Melanoma | Stage IIIC Melanoma | Stage IIB Melanoma | Stage IIC Melanoma | Stage IIA MelanomaUnited States
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNational Cancer Institute (NCI); University of VirginiaCompletedStage IIIB Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIC Skin Melanoma | Stage III Skin Melanoma | Stage IIA Skin Melanoma | Stage IIB Skin Melanoma | Stage IIC Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIA Skin Melanoma | Stage IA Skin Melanoma | Stage IB Skin Melanoma | Stage 0 Skin Melanoma | Stage I Skin Melanoma | Stage II Skin MelanomaUnited States
-
Emory UniversityGenentech, Inc.Active, not recruitingStage IV Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIB Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIC Skin Melanoma | Unresectable Melanoma | Stage III Melanoma | Stage IIIA Skin Melanoma | Cutaneous Melanoma, Stage III | Cutaneous Melanoma, Stage IVUnited States
-
MelanomaPRO, RussiaRecruitingMelanoma | Melanoma (Skin) | Melanoma Stage IV | Melanoma Stage III | Melanoma, Stage II | Melanoma, Uveal | Melanoma in Situ | Melanoma, OcularRussian Federation
-
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteTurnstone Biologics, Corp.CompletedMetastatic Melanoma | Conjunctival Melanoma | Ocular Melanoma | Unresectable Melanoma | Uveal Melanoma | Cutaneous Melanoma | Mucosal Melanoma | Iris Melanoma | Acral Melanoma | Non-Cutaneous MelanomaUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage IV Melanoma | Ciliary Body and Choroid Melanoma, Medium/Large Size | Iris Melanoma | Stage IIIA Melanoma | Stage IIIB Melanoma | Stage IIIC Melanoma | Extraocular Extension Melanoma | Stage IIB Melanoma | Stage IIC MelanomaUnited States