- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01997996
ProViS (Prolift+M and Vita Sexualis) Study (ProViS)
November 25, 2013 updated by: Dr. med. Tanja Hülder
ProViS (Prolift+M TM and Vita Sexualis) Study
Transvaginal meshes (TVM) are indicated for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) where surgical intervention is necessary.
Due to a potential risk of de novo dyspareunia, TVM are mainly used in postmenopausal women and in case of recurrent POP.
PROLIFT+M (Trademark) is based on a highly flexible material which is partially absorbable.
We suggest that PROLIFT+M has less impact on the vita sexualis than conventional TVM and could also be used for the treatment of younger and/or sexually active women.
This study observes women who are routinely treated with PROLIFT+M with regard to their sexual function before and after the surgery.
The hypothesis is that there is no worsening in vita sexualis with PROLIFT+M.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
18
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Bayern
-
Augsburg, Bayern, Germany, 86156
- Klinikum Augsburg
-
-
Saarland
-
Homburg/Saar, Saarland, Germany, 66424
- Universitatsklinikum des Saarlandes
-
-
Sachsen
-
Chemnitz, Sachsen, Germany, 09117
- Drk Krankenhaus Chemnitz-Rabenstein
-
-
-
-
-
St.Gallen, Switzerland, 9007
- Kantonsspital St.Gallen
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients visiting specialist in hospitals and specialized doctor's offices scheduled to undergo Prolapse surgery.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient understands the nature and content of the trial
- POP ≥ stage II (according to the POP-Q system (18))
- Sexual intercourse ≥ 2x/4 weeks
- Written informed consent
- Negative pregnancy test in women of childbearing potential
- Women ≥ 18 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- Concomitant surgery at the inner genitalis (e.g. colporrhaphy, sacrocolpopexy, sacrospinous fixation, hysterectomy); concomitant suburethral slings and bulking agents are allowed
- Unable to read or speak German
- Women < 18 years
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding or planning future pregnancies
- Acute infection(s), e.g. untreated urogenital infections
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
PROLIFT+M
Patients that undergo surgery due to prolapse POP ≥ stage II with PROLIFT+M device having had ≥ 2x/4 weeks sexual intercourse before surgery.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
vita sexualis
Time Frame: 7 to 1 day Preoperative vs. 12 months (+/- 1 month) Postoperative
|
No worsening in vita sexualis (decrease in total score Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-d) of ≤ 3.3; max.
score = 36) measured at 12 months (+/- 1 month) postoperatively as compared to the preoperative score.
|
7 to 1 day Preoperative vs. 12 months (+/- 1 month) Postoperative
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
pain during sexual intercourse
Time Frame: 7 to 1 day Preoperative vs. 12 months (+/- 1 month) Postoperative
|
No worsening in pain during sexual intercourse (decrease in weighted pain subscore FSFI-d of ≤ 1; max score = 6) measured at 12 months (+/- 1 month) postoperatively compared to preoperative.
|
7 to 1 day Preoperative vs. 12 months (+/- 1 month) Postoperative
|
|
Assessment of pelvic floor function
Time Frame: 7 to 1 day Preoperative vs. 12 months (+/- 1 month) Postoperative
|
Assessment of pelvic floor function using the validated German pelvic floor questionnaire at 12 months (+/- 1 month) postoperatively compared to preoperative (Deutscher Beckenboden-Fragebogen, validated German Version of the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire
|
7 to 1 day Preoperative vs. 12 months (+/- 1 month) Postoperative
|
|
Assessment of patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 12 months (+/- 1 month) Postoperative
|
Assessment of patient satisfaction at 12 months (+/- 1 month) postoperatively using the visual analogue scale (VAS), question regarding reoperation and patient global (PGI) question.VAS: On top of two scales, the question "How satisfied are you with the result of your operation?" is placed.
(Facial expressions are put above the line to express satisfaction visually).
In addition, the following two questions are asked: "Would you have the operation done again?" and "In the past 12 months how would you rate your condition as opposed to before your recent pelvic floor operation: much better/a little better/about the same/a little worse/much worse" (PGI question).
|
12 months (+/- 1 month) Postoperative
|
|
Assessment of recurrent POP (POP-Q ≥ stage II)
Time Frame: 3 months (12 weeks +/- 2) and 12 months (+/- 1 month) postoperatively
|
Assessment of recurrent POP (POP-Q ≥ stage II in the operated compartment(s)), mesh erosion/exposure; each measured 3 (12 +/- 2 weeks) and 12 months (+/- 1 month) postoperatively by clinical examination (Speculum, palpation, POP-Q)
|
3 months (12 weeks +/- 2) and 12 months (+/- 1 month) postoperatively
|
|
Safety
Time Frame: until 12 months (+/- 1 month) postoperatively
|
Safety (documentation and assessment of medical device incidents; serious incidents and near incidents will be reported to the competent authorities)
|
until 12 months (+/- 1 month) postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Tanja Hülder, Dr.med., Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2013
Study Completion (Actual)
October 1, 2013
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 29, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 25, 2013
First Posted (Estimate)
November 28, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
November 28, 2013
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 25, 2013
Last Verified
November 1, 2013
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CTU 10/038
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.