Lung Function and Patient Preference With QVA149 vs. Tiotropium in COPD Patients (FAVOR)

March 14, 2017 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Cross-over Study to Assess Lung Function and Patient Preference After a 4 Week Treatment Each With QVA149 vs. Tiotropium in Patients With Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Moderate to Severe Airflow Limitation Who Are on a Tiotropium Therapy (FAVOR Study)

The study is a multicenter, randomized, 2-period, open-label, two arm, cross-over study to show the superior effect of a 4 week treatment each with QVA149 versus tiotropium on lung function. Similarly, this study aims to evaluate patient preference after experiencing both treatment regimens in patients with a clinical diagnosis of COPD (GOLD 2013) and a moderate to severe airflow limitation who are symptomatic (defined as CAT score of at least 10) at screening despite being treated with tiotropium

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

88

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 12203
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Berlin, Germany, 13057
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bonn, Germany, 53119
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60389
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60318
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, 82467
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hannover, Germany, 30173
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kassel, Germany, 34121
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04275
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • München, Germany, 80686
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Münster, Germany, 48147
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Neu Isenburg, Germany, 63263
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Rheine, Germany, 48431
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Siegen, Germany, 57072
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Solingen, Germany, 42665
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Sonneberg, Germany, 96515
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Warendorf, Germany, 48231
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Rheinland Pfalz
      • Ibbenbüren, Rheinland Pfalz, Germany, 49477
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • signed an Informed Consent Form
  • stable COPD according to current guidelines (GOLD 2013)
  • airflow limitation indicated by a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio of <0.70 and a post-bronchodilator FEV1 of ≥30% and <80% of predicted normal values at Visit 2.
  • current or ex-smokers who have a smoking history of at least 10 pack years
  • Patients on stable tiotropium (18 µg/d) monotherapy for at least 8 weeks before Visit 1
  • Symptomatic patients defined as patients with CAT score ≥ 10 at Visit 1 (Screening).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breast feeding mothers
  • Patients with conditions contraindicated for treatment
  • Patients with a history of clinically significant diseases
  • Patients who have a clinically significant renal disease
  • Patients with myocardial infarctions less than 6 months prior to study entry
  • Patients with recent (less than 1 year) history of NYHA Class III/IV left ventricular failure.
  • Patients with narrow-angle glaucoma, symptomatic prostatic hyperplasia or bladder-neck obstruction or urinary retention
  • Patients with a history of malignancy of any organ system
  • Patients who have had a COPD exacerbation that required treatment with antibiotics, and/or systemic steroids (oral or intravenous) and/or hospitalization in the 6 weeks prior to Screening
  • Patients who have had a respiratory tract infection within 6 weeks prior to Screening
  • Patients with any history of asthma.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment sequence 1
QVA149 from day 1 to day 28 and tiotropium from day 29 to day 56
QVA149 capsules 110/50 µg for inhalation via Concep-1-inhaler device, taken once a day
Other Names:
  • indacaterol maleate/glycoporromium bromide
Tiotropium 18 µg capsules for inhalation via HandiHaler device taken once a day
Experimental: Treatment sequence 2
Tiotropium from day 1 to day 28 and QVA149 from day 29 to day 56
QVA149 capsules 110/50 µg for inhalation via Concep-1-inhaler device, taken once a day
Other Names:
  • indacaterol maleate/glycoporromium bromide
Tiotropium 18 µg capsules for inhalation via HandiHaler device taken once a day

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at 1 h Post-inhalation
Time Frame: week 4
Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) will be calculated as the volume of air forcibly exhaled in one second as measured by a spirometer.
week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Preference After Experiencing Both Treatments Was Assessed at the End of Treatment Period 2 With a Patient Preference Questionnaire.
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Patient preference after experiencing both treatments. The patient's preference questionnaire was a two-choice question (preference for QVA149 OR Tiotropium.
8 weeks
Investigator Preference Per Patient After Experiencing Both Treatments for Future Suggestions.
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The investigator preference for future treatment suggestion after experiencing both treatments was assessed at the end of treatment period 2 with the Investigator Preference Questionnaire
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 29, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on QVA149

Subscribe