- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02180893
The Use of Paravertebral Block for Cardiac Surgery
February 16, 2016 updated by: NYU Langone Health
Study of Paravertebral Block for Cardiac Surgery
Pain after robotic cardiac surgery is a known problem and is often difficult to manage.
Paravertebral nerve blocks are a proven method of pain relief following thoracotomy.
A paravertebral block has been shown to provide good pain relief with minimal side effects, however, paravertebral blocks for robotic surgery have not been well studied.
Currently the investigators routinely perform PVB on this patient population (of 50 MV robotic cases done between January and October 2012, 36 received paravertebral blocks with no adverse events noted).
The investigators believe this should be studied further and that paravertebral blocks will reduce the amount of additional pain medication patients require in the first 24 hours after surgery, decrease intubation time and improve PACU and hospital discharge times.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Pain after robotic cardiac surgery is a known problem and is often difficult to manage.
Paravertebral nerve blocks are a proven method of pain relief following thoracotomy.
A paravertebral block has been shown to provide good pain relief with minimal side effects, however, paravertebral blocks for robotic surgery have not been well studied.
Currently we routinely perform PVB on this patient population (of 50 MV robotic cases done between January and October 2012, 36 received paravertebral blocks with no adverse events noted).
We believe this should be studied further and that paravertebral blocks will reduce the amount of additional pain medication patients require in the first 24 hours after surgery, decrease intubation time and improve PACU and hospital discharge times.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10016
- NYU Langone Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients over the age of 18 years of age undergoing robotic mitral valve surgery.
- have capacity to understand and sign consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients that are not candidates for paravertebral block as per ASRA guidelines (Horlocker, Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2010). In short, this includes patients taking specific anti platelet agents such as clopidigrel, anticoagulants such as heparin or low molecular weight heparin, or patients with an INR of greater than 1.5. -patients with a history of COPD or other respiratory diseases that would confound data on time to extubated will be excluded.
- Patients that with a diagnosis of chronic pain, or patients currently taking narcotics are excluded, as this would confound data on postoperative narcotic requirements.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Paravertebral block
Patient receiving a PVB prior to robotic mitral valve surgery
|
Paravertebral nerve block injection
|
|
Placebo Comparator: No block
Patients who did not receive PVB
|
No block Patients who did not receive PVB |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Fentanyl
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
24 hours
|
|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Possible scores range from 0-10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being highest level of pain
|
24 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Participant Satisfaction
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
Participants were asked whether or not they were satisfied with their postoperative pain control (yes or no)
|
48 hours
|
|
Participant Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
Participants were asked to score their satisfaction with their postoperative pain control on a scale of 0 (least satisfied) to 10 (most satisfied)
|
48 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Peter J Neuburger, MD, NYU
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Suri RM, Antiel RM, Burkhart HM, Huebner M, Li Z, Eton DT, Topilsky T, Sarano ME, Schaff HV. Quality of life after early mitral valve repair using conventional and robotic approaches. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Mar;93(3):761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.11.062.
- Lynch JJ, Mauermann WJ, Pulido JN, Rehfeldt KH, Torres NE. Use of paravertebral blockade to facilitate early extubation after minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010 Mar;14(1):47-8. doi: 10.1177/1089253210363009.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2014
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 2, 2014
First Posted (Estimate)
July 3, 2014
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
March 15, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 16, 2016
Last Verified
February 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- S12-02774
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mitral Valve Insufficiency
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedMitral Valve Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Incompetence | Mitral Insufficiency | Functional Mitral Regurgitation | Mitral Stenosis With InsufficiencyJapan
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUniversity Hospital, Bordeaux; Montreal Heart InstituteRecruitingMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Disease | Mitral Annular CalcificationSwitzerland, United States, Denmark, United Kingdom, France, Austria, Canada, Italy, Germany, Greece, Poland, Australia, Norway
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Insufficiency | Mitral Valve Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Incompetence | Mitral InsufficiencyUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Insufficiency | Mitral Valve Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Incompetence | Mitral InsufficiencyUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesRecruiting
-
Abbott Medical DevicesActive, not recruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Heart Valve Diseases | Mitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Insufficiency | Valve Disease, Heart | Mitral Insufficiency | Functional Mitral Regurgitation | Degenerative Mitral Valve DiseaseCanada, United States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Insufficiency | Mitral Valve Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Incompetence | Mitral InsufficiencyUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Insufficiency | Mitral Valve Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Incompetence | Mitral InsufficiencyUnited States
-
4C Medical Technologies, Inc.RecruitingMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Incompetence | Mitral Insufficiency | Mitral IncompetenceUnited States
-
4C Medical Technologies, Inc.RecruitingMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Incompetence | Mitral Insufficiency | Mitral IncompetenceUnited States, Spain, Germany, Greece
Clinical Trials on Paravertebral Block
-
Tongji HospitalRecruitingPneumothorax | Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) | Atelectasis | Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) | Bronchospasm | Lung Cancer (Diagnosis) | Pulmonary Infections | Bronchopleural Fistula | Pleural Effusion Due to Another Disorder (Disorder) | Pulmonary Embolism (Diagnosis) | Respiratory...China
-
Larissa University HospitalUnknownBreast Surgery | Autonomic Nervous System | Thoracic Paravertebral Block | HRVGreece
-
Bursa City HospitalRecruitingPost-thoracotomy PainTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Makassed General HospitalRecruiting
-
Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training HospitalCompletedVideo-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery | Postoperative Analgesia | Thoracic Paravertebral BlockTurkey
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyRecruitingPain, Acute | Nerve Block | Thoracic AnesthesiaChina
-
Assiut UniversityRecruitingKidney Stones | Percutaneous NephrolithotomyEgypt
-
University Hospital, RouenCompletedAnesthesia | Video Assisted ThoracoscopyFrance