Reducing Residual Depressive Symptoms With Web-based Mindful Mood Balance

January 24, 2019 updated by: Zindel Segal, University of Toronto

Reducing Residual Depressive Symptoms With Web-based Mindful Mood Balance.

Many patients report residual depressive symptoms despite seemingly successful treatment. With the investigators' previous funding, we developed - Mindful Mood Balance - an online treatment that targets RDS by teaching specific emotion regulation and depression self-management skills that are entirely compatible with antidepressant treatment. The investigators now propose a controlled study to determine whether MMB is more effective than usual care at reducing RDS and other key outcomes. If successful, MMB's online delivery format would provide high fidelity and low-cost empirically supported management of residual symptoms, leading to more robust remission, improved functioning and sustained recovery from MDD over time.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Residual depressive symptoms (RDS) following remission of major depressive disorder (MDD) are reported by 80-90% of adults receiving first-line antidepressant pharmacotherapy and carry an elevated risk for a chronic course of illness, rapid relapse and functional impairment. Strategies for managing residual symptoms, however, have met with mixed success. Mindful Mood Balance (MMB; R34 MH0877223) is an individually tailored, web-based treatment designed to train remitted depressed patients to disengage from dysphoria-activated depressogenic thinking that perpetuates RDS and increases risk for relapse/recurrence. MMB was developed to increase access to Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT; R01 MH066992), an empirically supported prophylactic group treatment that can be easily sequenced with acute phase antidepressant pharmacotherapy. Results from our open trial of MMB (N=100) showed an effect size of d=1.09 for pre to post treatment reductions in depression scores among patients with RDS and d=1.54 in a quasi-experimental comparison to patients receiving usual care, with an on average reduction of 1.98 points on the PHQ-9 for MMB patients. The investigators now propose a pragmatic randomized clinical trial of MMB to evaluate its effectiveness in reducing RDS in recurrently depressed patients. Patients will be members of Kaiser-Permanente Colorado (N = 460), aged 18 to 75, who score >5 and <9 on the PHQ-9, in remission from MDD and will be randomized 1:1 to either the usual depression care pathway (DepCare) or Mindful Mood Balance (MMB)+DepCare.

The investigators plan to test whether patients receiving MMB+DepCare will show greater reductions in RDS at both 8 week and 12 months follow up, than those receiving DepCare alone. The investigators are also interested in examining whether fewer patients in MMB+DepCare will relapse over the follow up and will have higher end state functioning and quality of life. In order to examine the costs associated with adding this online treatment to the Depression Care Pathways at KPCO, the investigators will calculate the marginal costs per additional number of depression free days (DFDs) for patients. Resolution of RDS can reduce the enormous personal and social costs experienced by Americans with this persistent symptom burden.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

460

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80237-8066
        • Kaiser Permanente Institute for Health Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a PHQ-9 score between 5 and 9
  • At least one prior episode of MDD

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of schizophrenia or current psychosis, organic mental disorder or pervasive developmental delay

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindful Mood Balance
An 8 session internet intervention targeting residual depressive symptoms.
Usual Depression Care will be based on the Kaiser Permanente Adult Depression National Guidelines - an adaptation of STAR*D (Rush et al., 2006) for antidepressant management and the IMPACT (Unitzer et al., 2002; 2008) model for therapy.
Mindful Mood Balance is an individually tailored, web-based version of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy, a manualized, group skills training program (Segal et al., 2002) that is based on an integration of aspects of cognitive therapy for depression (Beck, 1979) with components of the mindfulness-based stress reduction program (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Patients participated in 8 internet sessions, each of which incorporates didactic and experiential learning, along with home practice of skills taught in the program.
Active Comparator: Usual Depression Care
Usual Depression Care through Kaiser Permanente Colorado
Usual Depression Care will be based on the Kaiser Permanente Adult Depression National Guidelines - an adaptation of STAR*D (Rush et al., 2006) for antidepressant management and the IMPACT (Unitzer et al., 2002; 2008) model for therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 weeks and 15 months
Changes in self reported depressive symptom severity
Change from Baseline to 12 weeks and 15 months
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Time Frame: Between 12 weeks and 15 months
Rates of depressive relapse, defined as patients who score 15 or greater on the PHQ-9
Between 12 weeks and 15 months
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Time Frame: Between baseline to 12 weeks.
Conversion from moderate/high risk to low risk symptom categories, defined as a patient whose PHQ-9 score drops from a baseline PHQ-9 score between 5 and 9 to a mean score of 4 or less
Between baseline to 12 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ruminative Responses Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 15 months
A self-report measure of rumination
Change from Baseline to 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 15 months
Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 15 months
Self report measure of mindful awareness
Change from Baseline to 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 15 months
Five Facet Mindfulness Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 15 months
Self report measure of mindful awareness
Change from Baseline to 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 15 months
Experiences Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 15 months
Self report measure of decentering/wider awareness
Change from Baseline to 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 15 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression Free Days
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 weeks and 15 months
Self report of days free of depression
Change from Baseline to 12 weeks and 15 months
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment - 7
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 weeks and 15 months
Self report measure of generalized anxiety
Change from Baseline to 12 weeks and 15 months
Short Form Health Survey - 12
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 weeks and 15 months
Self report measure of physical and mental health
Change from Baseline to 12 weeks and 15 months
Emotion Dot Probe Task
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 weeks and 15 months
A behavioural measure of attentional bias
Change from Baseline to 12 weeks and 15 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zindel V Segal, PhD, University of Toronto

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 15, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Symptoms

Clinical Trials on Usual Depression Care

3
Subscribe