Digital 3D Breast Tomosynthesis Versus 2D in Clinical Evaluation of High Risk Women

August 4, 2014 updated by: Chantal Van Ongeval, MD, Phd, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

3D Digital Breast Tumorsynthesis Versus 2D Digital Mammography in the Clinical Evaluation of Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer

Patients with a higher breast cancer risk (higher than 17% according to the IBIS calculation) will receive a 2D digital mammography together with a 3D tomosynthesis (so called combo tomo) of both breasts in two views in order to investigate the additional value of tomosynthesis in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • Recruiting
        • UZLeuven
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Chantal Van Ongeval, MD,Phd

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

women with an increased risk for breast cancer > 17% according to the IBIS calculation, and also defined by the Multidisciplinary Breast centre UZ Leuven, Belgium

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women
  • more than 17% risk for breast cancer (IBIS calculation)
  • > 40y old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • < 40y old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
women at high risk for breast cancer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tumor dectection rate
Time Frame: 2 years
The addititional value of 3D tomosythesis to 2D digital mammography will be evaluated by the cancer detection rate, falls negative and falls positive results.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Falls negative, Falls positive results, accuracy
Time Frame: 4 years
4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chantal Van Ongeval, MD,Phd, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

August 5, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 5, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2014

Last Verified

August 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • B322201421047

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Subscribe