A Clinical Study of Two Dentinal Hypersensitivity Treatments Used With Normal Oral Hygiene

September 8, 2020 updated by: Procter and Gamble

A Randomized Clinical Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Two Dentinal Hypersensitivity Treatments Used With Normal Oral Hygiene

This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of normal oral hygiene with two different marketed dentifrices, on longer term dentinal hypersensitivity response following use of potassium oxalate desensitizers.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Fresno, California, United States, 93730
        • Chad J Anderson DMD Inc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be at least 18 years of age
  • Provide written informed consent prior to participation and be given a signed copy of the informed consent form
  • Complete a confidentiality disclosure agreement
  • Be in good general health as determined by the Investigator/designee
  • Have at least one tooth with a Schiff sensitivity score of at least 1 in response to the air challenge.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported pregnancy or nursing
  • Severe periodontal disease, as characterized by purulent exudate, generalized mobility, and/or severe recession
  • Active treatment of periodontitis
  • Fixed facial orthodontic appliances
  • A history of kidney stones
  • Known allergies to the following ingredients; aqua, glycerin, cellulose gum, dipotassium oxalate, carbomer, sodium hydroxide, sodium benzoate, and potassium sorbate
  • Any diseases or conditions that might interfere with the safe completion of the study
  • An inability to undergo any study procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: oxalate liquid & gel plus SnF2 paste
Potassium oxalate liquid, professionally applied Potassium oxalate gel, self applied Stannous fluoride paste, self applied
Professionally applied (liquid) and self applied (gel)
Toothpaste used by subject
Other Names:
  • SnF2 paste
Other: oxalate liquid & gel plus NaF paste
Potassium oxalate liquid, professionally applied Potassium oxalate gel, self applied Sodium fluoride paste, self applied
Professionally applied (liquid) and self applied (gel)
Toothpaste used by subject
Other Names:
  • NaF paste

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline Air Challenge
Time Frame: 60 days
The Schiff Sensitivity Scale was assessed for each test tooth via an evaporative air challenge. The examiner recorded the Schiff Index score corresponding to the response to the air challenge. The Schiff Index Sensitivity scale is scored as follows: 0: tooth/subject did not respond to stimulus, 1: tooth/subject responds to stimulus, but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2: tooth/subjects responds to stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus, 3: tooth/subject responds to stimulus considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. The higher the Schiff score, the more sensitive the tooth. The mean change from Baseline was calculated for this measure.
60 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 60 days
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - subjects are asked to look at a VAS and designate the level of hypersensitivity they experienced as a result of the thermal and water challenges using a continuum scale of 0 = No tooth pain up to 100 = Worst tooth pain ever experienced.
60 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chad J Anderson, MS, DMD, Chad J Anderson DMD Inc

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

August 20, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dentin Sensitivity

Clinical Trials on Potassium oxalate

Subscribe