Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of an Oxalate Gel or Negative Control on Dentinal Hypersensitivity

July 20, 2018 updated by: Procter and Gamble
This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of a potassium oxalate desensitizer or negative control on dentinal hypersensitivity.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89146
        • Silverstone Research Group

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • be at least 18 years of age;
  • provide written informed consent prior to participation and be given a signed copy of the informed consent form;
  • complete a confidentiality disclosure agreement;
  • be in good general health as determined by the Investigator/designee;
  • agree not to participate in any other oral/dental product studies during the course of this study;
  • agree to delay any dentistry (including dental prophylaxis) until the study has been completed;
  • agree to refrain from the use of any non-study oral hygiene products;
  • agree to return for all scheduled visits and follow study procedures; and.
  • have at least one tooth with a Schiff sensitivity score of at least 1 in response to air challenge and a Yeaple Probe score of 10-40 in response to tactile challenge

Exclusion Criteria:

  • self-reported pregnancy or nursing;
  • severe periodontal disease, as characterized by purulent exudate, generalized mobility, and/or severe recession;
  • active treatment of periodontitis;
  • fixed facial orthodontic appliances;
  • a history of kidney stones;
  • known allergies to the following ingredients; aqua, glycerin, cellulose gum, dipotassium oxalate, carbomer, sodium hydroxide, sodium benzoate, and potassium sorbate
  • any diseases or conditions that might interfere with the safe completion of the study; or
  • an inability to undergo any study procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Potassium Oxalate Gel
Self Applied
Other: Water
Self Applied

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline Air Challenge
Time Frame: 30 days
The Schiff Sensitivity Scale was assessed for each test tooth via an evaporative air challenge. The examiner recorded the Schiff Index score corresponding to the response to the air challenge. The Schiff Index Sensitivity scale is scored as follows- 0: tooth/subject did not respond to stimulus, 1: tooth/subject responds to stimulus, but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2: tooth/subject responds to stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves form stimulus, 3: tooth/subject responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. The higher the Schiff score, the more sensitive the tooth. The mean change from Baseline was calculated for this measure.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold
Time Frame: 30 days
Tactile Threshold was measured using a Yeaple probe. Testing was performed beginning at 10 g. The examiner recorded tactile scores for responding teeth. After treatment, testing began at 10 g and increase by 10 g to a maximum of 50 g. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. Each successive challenge increased until a "yes" response was repeated. If a second "yes" was not obtained, the force setting was increased to the next step and continued until a force was found which elicited two consecutive "yes" responses and was recorded as the threshold on the Tactile Sensitivity Score form. The mean change from Baseline was calculated for this measure.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 14, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2014029

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dentin Sensitivity

Clinical Trials on Water

3
Subscribe