Response Patterns to the Electric Stimulation of Epidural Catheters in Term Pregnant Women

Response Patterns to the Electric Stimulation of Epidural Catheters in Term Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Uniport Versus Multiport Catheters.

Lumbar epidural analgesia is commonly used for labor pain relief due to its effectiveness and safety. Despite its very high success rate, the epidural technique remains a rather blind technique and failures continue to occur. The correct placement of an epidural catheter, however, remains a clinical problem, since there is no imaging technique that could be used at the bedside to determine the exact positioning of the catheter. The technique of a trans-catheter electric stimulation test (TCEST) has been successfully used to detect the proper epidural catheter location for pediatric, post-operative and laboring obstetric patients. The response to the TCEST with the uniport (single hole) epidural catheters has been well described. There is a growing body of evidence that multiport epidural catheters provide an advantage to uniport catheters, since additional ports likely allow for an enhanced distribution of the local anesthetic solution. This was shown to result in a lower incidence of inadequate analgesia, including unilateral sensory blockade and missed sensory segments. The characteristics of the TCEST response using a multiport catheter remain to be determined. The aim of this study is to compare the response patterns to the TCEST using a single port versus multiport wire reinforced epidural catheters. The hypothesis of this study is that the incidence of a bilateral response to the TCEST will be higher in the multiport catheter as compared to the uniport catheter.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This will be a randomized double-blind controlled study. After recruitment of the patient, epidural anesthesia will be performed in the standard fashion employed in the investigators institution by a resident, fellow, or staff. Spinal ultrasound will be used prior to performing the epidural catheter insertion. Patients will be randomly allocated into two different groups to receive either a 19 gauge uniport catheter or a 19 gauge multiorifice catheter (Arrow Flextip plus, Arrow International Inc., Reading, PA). After securement of the catheter, the TCEST will be performed. The test will be repeated at 5 minutes, following a test dose, to determine the change in intensity of current required to elicit the motor response. Following the second testing, a loading dose of the standard anesthetic solution will be administered. The sensory level to ice will be tested at 20 minutes following injection of the loading dose of bupivacaine and fentanyl. The sensory level will be assessed from the sacral to the thoracic levels, bilaterally Failure of the epidural analgesia will be assessed, defined as no evidence of a sensory block to ice and absent pain relief. The need for catheter replacement will be determined within 2 hours of the completion of the loading dose.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G1X5
        • Mount Sinai Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women over 18 years of age requesting an epidural for labor and delivery
  • Able to communicate in English
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to provide written informed consent
  • Unable to communicate in English
  • Allergy or hypersensitivity to lidocaine, bupivacaine or fentanyl
  • Abnormal vertebral anatomy, including previous spine surgery and scoliosis
  • Coexisting neurological disorders
  • Implanted electronic devices

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Uniport catheter
19 gauge uniport epidural catheter
Other Names:
  • Tsui test
Active Comparator: Multiport catheter
19 gauge multiorifice epidural catheter
Other Names:
  • Tsui test

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motor response pattern
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Motor response pattern to the electrical stimulation of the epidural catheter, either unilateral or bilateral
5 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Current (mA)
Time Frame: 5 minutes
The current (mA) needed to elicit a motor response at control and at 5 minutes after the test dose
5 minutes
Sensory level
Time Frame: 20 minutes
The sensory level to ice at 20 minutes following injection of the standard epidural loading dose. The sensory level will be assessed from the sacral to the thoracic levels, bilaterally
20 minutes
Epidural block failure
Time Frame: 20 minutes
Failure of the epidural analgesia, defined as no evidence of a sensory block to ice and absent pain relief
20 minutes
Catheter replacement
Time Frame: 2 hours
Need for catheter replacement within 2 hours of the completion of the loading dose
2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 24, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 19, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 14-05

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Labor Pain

Clinical Trials on Trans-catheter electric stimulation test

Subscribe