One-month Clinical Evaluation of Silicone Hydrogel Definitive 65 HPT Contact Lenses

August 10, 2020 updated by: Contamac Ltd
Comparison of different contact lens materials.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a 1-month, open-label, bilateral, parallel-group, randomised, daily wear study. Two-thirds of the subjects will wear the Test lenses in both eyes, and one-third will wear the Control lenses in both eyes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kassel, Germany
        • Siehste
      • Würzburg, Germany
        • Kresinky

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • willing and able to sign informed consent form
  • ages 18 years or older
  • Subjects must have owned spectacles or contact lenses prior to enrolment for this trial
  • Spherical power between -10.00 D and +10.00 D (at vertex distance 0 mm)
  • Astigmatic power ≤0.75 D

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Eye injury or surgery within 3 months immediately prior to enrolment for this trial
  • Pre-existing ocular irritation that would preclude contact lens fitting
  • Currently enrolled in an ophthalmic clinical trial
  • Evidence of systemic or ocular abnormality, infection or disease which is likely to affect successful wear of contact lenses or use of the accessory solutions, as determined by the investigator
  • Any use of medications for which contact lens wear could be contradicted, as determined by the investigator
  • Current extended-wear users (sleep-in overnight)
  • Current monovision lens wearers
  • Pregnant women and nursing mothers
  • Best-corrected visual acuity worse than 6/9 (LogMAR: +0.20; Snellen decimal: 0.63)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Definitive 65 HPT
The Test product were the Definitive 65 (Filcon V4) lenses with Hydra PEG surface coating. This material is produced by Contamac Ltd. and the contact lenses were manufactured by Appenzeller Kontaktlinsen AG.
Other Names:
  • Filcon V4 (HPT)
Active Comparator: Definitive 65
The Control product was the commercially available Definitive 65 (Efrofilcon A) lens. This material is produced by Contamac Ltd. and the contact lenses were manufactured by Appenzeller Kontaktlinsen AG.
Other Names:
  • Filcon V4

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
questionnaire addressing subjective comfort and wear time
Time Frame: subjects will be followed-up for one month
Subjects rated on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 was 'poor' and 10 was 'excellent'.
subjects will be followed-up for one month
limbal redness - ocular biomicroscopy
Time Frame: subjects will be followed-up for one month
Assessed using slit lamp with white light, low-medium magnification. Graded based on a grading scale which ranged from 0 to 4, where 0 is none, 1 is trace, 2 is mild, 3 is moderate and 4 is severe.
subjects will be followed-up for one month
conjunctival redness - ocular biomicroscopy
Time Frame: subjects will be followed-up for one month
Assessed using slit lamp with white light, low-medium magnification. Graded based on a grading scale which ranged from 0 to 4, where 0 is none, 1 is trace, 2 is mild, 3 is moderate and 4 is severe.
subjects will be followed-up for one month
corneal staining - ocular biomicroscopy
Time Frame: subjects will be followed-up for one month
Assessed using slit lamp with white light, low-medium magnification. Graded based on a grading scale which ranged from 0 to 4, where 0 is none, 1 is trace, 2 is mild, 3 is moderate and 4 is severe.
subjects will be followed-up for one month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andreas Hartwig, PhD, FAAO, Hartwig Research Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 8, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 23, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

May 23, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 9, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CM-001-002

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe