Multiple-portal VATS Versus Uniportal VATS Lobectomy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (MVUVLC)

A Randomized Controlled Study: the Effect of Multiple-portal VATS Versus Conventional VATS Lobectomy for NSCLC

This study evaluate multiple-portal VATS and uniportal VATS lobectomy for NSCLC, half of participants will receive multiple VATS, while the other half will receive uniportal VATS lobectomy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Conventional VATS and uniportal VATS lobectomy can be performed each for NSCLC. Conventional VATS lobectomy employ 3 or 4 ports for completing the operation. Usually the camera port is performed at the seventh or eighth intercostals space within the trocar, so it's easy to cause the intercostals nerve and vessel injure, and still create obvious pain.

However, the lobectomy for lung cancer can be accomplished with a single incision. According to the initial results, Uniportal VATS (UVATS) lobectomy procedure has been wide adopted by less acess trauma, relieve postoperative pain. But these were retrospective and descriptive, not randomized study. Further randomized control studies will be required to demonstrate that there are more benefits in UVATS techniques compared with conventional VATS for lobectomy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310000
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with clinical diagnosis of primary lung cancer with the age between 35 and 75 years old;
  • Patients with Tumor size ≤5cm,clinically staged T1-2N0-1M0,prepared for lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection;
  • Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiology score of 0-1.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with N2 or N3 positive or distant metastasis.
  • Patients who had undergone Neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
  • Patients with tumor invasion to the peripheral structures.
  • Patients with previous history of thoracic operations.
  • Patients with serious thoracic adhesion.
  • Patients who will undergo Pneumonectomy, sleeve lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge resection.
  • Patients with preexisting chronic obstructive pulmonarydisease, asthma, or interstitial lung disease;
  • Patients with cardiac, hepatic, or renal dysfunction;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional VATS
Via conventional VATS lobectomy and systematic lymph node dissection for lung cancer
Conventional VATS lobectomy and lymph node dissection will be performed in this group
Experimental: Uniportal VATS
Via uniportal VATS lobectomy and systematic lymph node dissection for lung cancer
Uniportal VATS lobectomy and lymph node dissection will be performed in this group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
short-term quality of life(EQ5D) between the two groups
Time Frame: Up to 6 month
To observe differences of short-term effects(bleeding volume during operation,operation time, hospital mortality, hospital stay and so on) between two groups.
Up to 6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intra-operative and postoperative complications
Time Frame: form the day of surgery up to discharege (expected within 1 month)
Surgical Complications include conversion rate, bleeding, air leakage, pain, cardiac arrhythmias, wound infection, pulmonary complications, pulmonary function will be measured.
form the day of surgery up to discharege (expected within 1 month)
lung function
Time Frame: pre-operative, 3 weeks, 3 months after surgery
lung function will be measured at pre-operative, 3 weeks, 3 months after surgery
pre-operative, 3 weeks, 3 months after surgery
Pain Scores after surgery
Time Frame: 1, 3 days and 1, 3 months after surgery
Pain Scores will be measured by Brief pain inventory
1, 3 days and 1, 3 months after surgery
The surgeon's ergonomic influence during operation(blinks/min)
Time Frame: The video is capture every 5 minutes and lasted for 1 minute
Spontaneous eye blink rate(NASA Task Load Index,NASA TLX)
The video is capture every 5 minutes and lasted for 1 minute

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe