Saxagliptin's Effects on Microalbuminuria Improvement in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

The Effects of Saxagliptin 5mg, Once Daily for 52 Weeks on 24 Hour Urine Albumin Creatinine Rate(ACR) , in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycaemic Control on Metformin or/and Acarbose

This study compare the effects on microalbuminuria improvement in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with saxagliptin or glimepiride.All patients received metformin and/or acarbose, and randomly receive saxagliptin (5mg/d) or glimepiride (1-4mg/d).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Both sitagliptin and glimepiride are hypoglycemic agents,but they do so by different mechanisms.sitagliptin can delay degradation of glucagon-like peptide -1 (GLP-1) by inhibit DPPIV to decrease serum glucose level.glimepiride stimulates islets B cell to secrete insulin to decrease serum glucose level.

Preclinical studies and several clinical trials (including vildagliptin, sitagliptin, linagliptin, exenatide) suggested that DPP-4i/GLP-1 might have a potential to lower albuminuria, albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) or improve glomerular filtration rate(GFR) and the effect might be independent of changes in glucose control. Recently, SAVOR outcomes also showed that saxagliptin might have nephroprotective effects, and the proportion of patients with microalbuminuria converted into normal albuminuria after saxagliptin treatment for 1 year is 31.3%, but the mechanism is still unclear.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

88

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Provision of informed consent prior to any study specific procedures
  2. Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes with stable, doses of metformin (1000mg~2550mg/d) or acarbose (100mg~300mg/d) at least 60 days
  3. Men and women (non-pregnant and using a medically approved birth-control method) aged at age ≥20 and ≤70 years at screening
  4. HbA1c ≥ 7.0% and ≤ 9.0% at screening
  5. 24-hour urinary albumin level of 30-300 mg/24 h

Exclusion Criteria:

1.Women, who are pregnant, or intending to become pregnant during the study period, currently lactating females, or women of child-bearing potential not using highly effective, medically approved birth control methods.

2. Diagnosis or history of:

  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus, diabetes resulting from pancreatic injury or secondary forms of diabetes, e.g acromegaly or Cushing's syndrome.
  • Acute metabolic diabetic complications such as ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar coma within the past 6 months.

    3. Previous treatment with any dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonists within the past 6 months. 4. History of hypersensitivity reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis, angioedema, exfoliative skin conditions) to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4), glimepiride, metformin or acarbose.

    5. Treatment with systemic glucocorticoids (oral, intravenous) for more than consecutive 7 days within the past 6 months.

    6. Triglycerides (fasting) > 4.5 mmol/L (> 400 mg/dL) at screening or within 4 weeks prior to screening.

    7. Patients with clinically apparent liver disease characterized by either one of the following:

  • alanine aminotransferase((ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase(AST) > 3x upper limit of normal (ULN) confirmed on two consecutive measurements within 4 weeks prior to screening period
  • Impaired excretory (eg, hyperbilirubinemia) and/or synthetic function, or other conditions of decompensated liver disease such as coagulopathy, hepatic encephalopathy, hypoalbuminemia, ascites and bleeding from oesophageal varices.
  • Acute viral or active autoimmune, alcoholic, or other types of hepatitis.

    8. Patients with moderate /severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease (CrCl ≤ 50 mL/min) at screening or within 4 weeks prior to screening

    9. Congestive heart failure defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV.

    10. Significant cardiovascular history within the past 3 months prior to screening defined as: myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty or bypass graft(s), valvular disease or repair, unstable angina pectoris, transient ischemic attack, or cerebrovascular accident.

    11. History of chronic pancreatitis or idiopathic acute pancreatitis.

    12. History of gastrointestinal disease including gastroenterostomy, enterectomy, severe hernia, intestinal obstruction, intestinal ulcer.

    13. History of medullary thyroid carcinoma.

    14. History of alcohol abuse or illegal drug abuse within the past 12 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Saxagliptin
Saxagliptin 5mg/d, 52 weeks
Active Comparator: glimepiride
glimepiride 1~4mg/d,52 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
microalbuminuria improvement in T2DM treated with saxagliptin
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
incidence of hypoglycaemia of saxagliptin or glimepiride
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 28, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2015

Last Verified

April 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe