The Effect of Bowel Preparation on Perioperative Bleeding

July 7, 2015 updated by: Abbasi, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

By Reza Abbasi and Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Now a days, due to the change in lifestyle, the extended lifespan and the increase in the rate of the road accidents, the need for surgical operation of spinal instrumentation has been increased. And these surgeries are the most crucial part of neurological surgery wards. The everyday improvements in the quality of equipment used and advancements in surgical methods lead to best performance of these procedures and finally the higher quality of patients' lives. The procedures of Laminectomy and pedicular screw instrumentation lead to pain relief and better performance and developments in the quality of patients' lives.

In addition to the above mentioned improvements, you must consider the fact that these activities are still accompanied by complications during and after surgical operation.

Nerve root injury, Thecal sac tearing, injury to the spinal cord and the inappropriate sagittal balance are the most significant side effects during spinal surgery.

One of the most important complications during and after these surgeries is perioperative bleeding that causes problems both for the patients and the surgeon.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The individuals evaluated in this study were those who have been admitted and undergone spiral surgery (Fusion and Instrumentation) with pedicular screw because of spinal column instability and canal stenosis.

This study has been started and performed since Feb.2013 to June 2015 at the neurosurgery ward of Al.zahra hospital of Isfahan.

The candidates chosen for the study were those who undergone the surgery procedure due to degenerative change of Lumbar spinal canal.

The necessity of operation for each patient is diagnosed based on clinical finding, Imaging data and guidelines according to neurosurgery reference sources.(Richards Winn,Youmans Neurological Survey, Sixth Edition, Vol 3,Ch.303) During this prospective study, patients are randomly divided into two groups of Case and Control. The individuals attended these two groups are matched regarding age, sex and general medical condition. The age ranges in this study are 33 to 82 years old.

Other than general surgery consent taken from both groups, patients in Case group are informed about the procedure of the program and probable side effects.

Primarily, patients' weight, height, BMI, and Hemoglobin are recorded. In Case group, patients firstly get liquid diet for 24 hours. After that they get PEG solution (80gr/1Litr) each 8 hours for 24 hours. After 48 hours, bowel is mechanically prepared for the procedure. Cefazolin 1 gram every 6hours for 2 days was taken in both groups.

In both Case and Control groups, the time of surgery and the volume of bleeding (in CC) are precisely recorded by surgery and anesthesiology team. The need for blood transfusion during surgery is based on preoperation hemoglobin and the volume of bleeding during surgery and is calculated according to anesthesiology and surgical standards using the following formula:

( )/Hb ×0.6 BW kg×10022 Immediately at the end of surgery, the exact rate of bleeding during operation ( in CC), the length of operation and the length of the operation and the estimated transfusion rate are recorded.

Also, after surgery the volume of bleeding in homovac drain in time intervals of 24 to 48-hour are recorded.

Also the patients' levels of Hb in 24 to 48-hour intervals are calculated. After improving general medical conditions of the patients and their walking abilities, they are ambulated and finally are discharged from hospital.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

105

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

33 years to 82 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who suffer from lumbar spine degenerative disease and need spine fusion surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of Trauma,
  • History of Malignancy,
  • previous spinal surgery,
  • History of coagulation disorder,
  • active infectious disease,
  • gastrointestinal problems,
  • severe movement disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PEG & Cefazolin
patients firstly get liquid diet for 24 hours. After that they get PEG solution (80gr/1Litr) each 8 hours for 24 hours. After 48 hours, cefazolin 1gram, every 6hours for 2 days
PEG solution (80gr/1Litr) each 8 hours for 24 hours
Other Names:
  • PEG solution
cefazolin 1gram, every 6hours for 2 days
Other Names:
  • Kefzol
Sham Comparator: placebo & cefazolin
placebo for PEG and cefazolin 1gram, every 6hours for 2 days
cefazolin 1gram, every 6hours for 2 days
Other Names:
  • Kefzol
placebo each 8 hours for 24 hours
Other Names:
  • sham

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The volume of bleeding was measured in milliliter
Time Frame: up to 3 days
up to 3 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Reza Abbasi, MD, Alzahra University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 10, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Abbasi1

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Clinical Trials on PEG

Subscribe