Effects of Treatment With High Flow Nasal Cannulas on Respiratory Pattern and Work of Breathing Among Healthy Subjects (HDWOBSS)

July 10, 2015 updated by: Laval University
This study evaluates the work of breathing among healthy subjects under various conditions of treatment with high flow nasal cannulas. Ten subjects will be included. The design of this study is a cross over of five treatment periods with different flow settings.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

High flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) is a promising technique increasingly used in the management of acute respiratory failure. In hospitalised hypoxemic patients, recent clinical evidence showed that HFOT can reduce endotracheal intubation and reduce mortality. Physiologically, the HFOT causes a decrease in respiratory rate and minute-ventilation and may be associated with a decrease in carbone dioxyde arterial pressure. It is possible that these effects are associated with decreased work of breathing, which could explain some of the benefits in terms of comfort and efficiency.

The objective of this research is to evaluate the impact of a wash-out of anatomical dead space by high flow nasal cannulas on respiratory parameters and on the work of breathing among healthy subjects. The investigators will evaluate the baseline status in room air, and then compare it with four different levels of flow. The primary endpoint will be the work of breathing.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy subjects
  • Written and informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
  • Subject enrolled in another study excluding co-enrolment;
  • Cardio-vascular or respiratory disease;
  • History of ear nose and throat disease (i.e. surgery, epistaxis, trauma), eso-gastric disease (i.e. esophageal varices, digestive haemorrhage), rheumatologic or neurologic disease possibly interfering with the design of the study;
  • Subject feeling nauseous or under recent fed condition (<1h).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: No flow
Subjects will be spontaneously breathing in room air with no flow.
Experimental: Conventional flow via nasal prongs
Subjects will be breathing with nasal prongs delivering 5 L/min of air (inspired fraction of oxygen: 0.21)
Low flow of air delivered through conventional nasal prongs
Experimental: High flow nasal cannulas 20 L/min
Subjects will be breathing with high flow nasal cannulas delivering 20 L/min with an inspired fraction of oxygen of 0.21.
Comparison of different flow levels
Other Names:
  • Airvo 2; Ficher and Paykel HealthCare
Experimental: High flow nasal cannulas 40 L/min
Subjects will be breathing with high flow nasal cannulas delivering 40 L/min with an inspired fraction of oxygen of 0.21.
Comparison of different flow levels
Other Names:
  • Airvo 2; Ficher and Paykel HealthCare
Experimental: High flow nasal cannulas 60 L/min
Subjects will be breathing with high flow nasal cannulas delivering 60 L/min with an inspired fraction of oxygen of 0.21.
Comparison of different flow levels
Other Names:
  • Airvo 2; Ficher and Paykel HealthCare

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Work of breathing
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Work of breathing at the end of each period is calculated from the measurement of esophageal pressure and tidal volume (composite outcome).
10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Esophageal pressure-time product
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Measured at the end of each period
10 minutes
Tidal Volume
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Measured at the end of each period
10 minutes
Comfort of breathing
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Subjective evaluation at the end of each period
10 minutes
Blood gases
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Arterial or capillary blood gases at the end of each period
10 minutes
Dyspnea
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Evaluation on a borg scale at the end of each period
10 minutes
Respiratory Rate
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Measured at the end of each period
10 minutes
End-tidal carbon dioxide
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Measured at the end of each period
10 minutes
Heart rate
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Measured at the end of each period
10 minutes
Oxygen saturation
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Measured at the end of each period
10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: François Lellouche, MD, PhD, Fondation IUCPQ

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 13, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IUCPQ-HDWOBSS

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on Conventional flow via nasal prongs

Subscribe